UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Commission File No. 1-12504
THE MACERICH COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
95-4448705 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401 (Address of principal executive office, including zip code) |
||
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (310) 394-6000 |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act |
||
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Preferred Share Purchase Rights |
New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
YES o NO ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment on to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO ý
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $3.8 billion as of the last business day of the registrant's most recent completed second fiscal quarter based upon the price at which the common shares were last sold on that day.
Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, as of February 13, 2008: 72,336,763 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual stockholders meeting to be held in 2008 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K
THE MACERICH COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
INDEX
|
|
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Part I | ||||
Item 1. |
Business |
1 |
||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 14 | ||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 21 | ||
Item 2. | Properties | 22 | ||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 31 | ||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 31 | ||
Part II |
||||
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
32 |
||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 34 | ||
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 38 | ||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 53 | ||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 54 | ||
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 54 | ||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 54 | ||
Item 9A(T). | Controls and Procedures | 57 | ||
Item 9B. | Other Information | 57 | ||
Part III |
||||
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
58 |
||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 58 | ||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 58 | ||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 59 | ||
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 59 | ||
Part IV |
||||
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
60 |
||
Signatures |
138 |
IMPORTANT FACTORS RELATED TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Macerich Company (the "Company") contains or incorporates statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Any statements that do not relate to historical or current facts or matters are forward-looking statements. You can identify some of the forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "projects," "predicts," "plans," "believes," "seeks," and "estimates" and variations of these words and similar expressions. Statements concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions. Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places in this Form 10-K and include statements regarding, among other matters:
Stockholders are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company or the industry to differ materially from the Company's future results, performance or achievements, or those of the industry, expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and other factors that may affect our business and operating results, including those made in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. The Company does not intend, and undertakes no obligation, to update any forward-looking information to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
General
The Company is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community shopping centers located throughout the United States. The Company is the sole general partner of, and owns a majority of the ownership interests in, The Macerich Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). As of December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership owned or had an ownership interest in 74 regional shopping centers and 20 community shopping centers aggregating approximately 80.7 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"). These 94 regional and community shopping centers are referred to hereinafter as the "Centers", unless the context otherwise requires. The Company is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") and conducts all of its operations through the Operating Partnership and the Company's management companies, Macerich Property Management Company, LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company, Macerich Management Company, a California corporation, Westcor Partners, L.L.C., a single member Arizona limited liability company,
1
Macerich Westcor Management LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company, Westcor Partners of Colorado, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, MACW Mall Management, Inc., a New York corporation, and MACW Property Management, LLC, a single member New York limited liability company. All seven of the management companies are collectively referred to herein as the "Management Companies."
The Company was organized as a Maryland corporation in September 1993 to continue and expand the shopping center operations of Mace Siegel, Arthur M. Coppola, Dana K. Anderson and Edward C. Coppola (the "principals") and certain of their business associates.
All references to the Company in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include the Company, those entities owned or controlled by the Company and predecessors of the Company, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Financial information regarding the Company for each of the last three fiscal years is contained in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Recent Developments
Stock Repurchase:
On March 16, 2007, the Company repurchased 807,000 common shares for $75.0 million concurrent with the offering of convertible senior notes (See "Financing Activity"). These shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company's stock repurchase program authorized by the Company's Board of Directors on March 9, 2007. This repurchase program ended on March 16, 2007 because the maximum shares allowed to be repurchased under the program was reached.
Acquisitions and Dispositions:
On September 5, 2007, the Company purchased the remaining 50% outside ownership interest in Hilton Village, a 96,546 square foot specialty center in Scottsdale, Arizona. The total purchase price of $13.5 million was funded by cash, borrowings under the Company's line of credit and the assumption of the $8.6 million mortgage note payable on the property.
On December 17, 2007, the Company purchased a portfolio of fee simple and/or ground leasehold interests in 39 freestanding Mervyn's department stores located in the Southwest United States for $400.2 million. The purchase price was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. Concurrent with the acquisition, the Company entered into 39 individual agreements to leaseback the properties to Mervyns from terms of 14 to 20 years. The Company has designated the 27 freestanding Mervyn's stores located at shopping centers not owned or managed by the Company as available for sale.
On January 1, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company, at the election of the holders, redeemed approximately 3.4 million participating convertible preferred units ("PCPUs") (the common stock equivalent of approximately 2.9 million shares) in exchange for the distribution of the interests in the entity which held that portion of the Wilmorite portfolio that consisted of Eastview Mall, Greece Ridge Center, Marketplace Mall and Pittsford Plaza, collectively referred to as the "Rochester Properties." This exchange is referred to as the "Rochester Redemption."
On January 10, 2008, the Company in a 50/50 joint venture, acquired The Shops at North Bridge, a 680,933 square foot urban shopping center in Chicago, Illinois, for a total purchase price of $515.0 million. The Company's share of the purchase price was funded by the assumption of a pro rata share of the $205.0 million fixed rate mortgage on the Center and by borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
2
Financing Activity:
On January 2, 2007, the Company paid off the $75.0 million loan on Paradise Valley Mall. The repayment was funded by the proceeds from the sale of Citadel Mall, Northwest Arkansas Mall and Crossroads Mall on December 29, 2006.
On January 23, 2007, the Company exercised an earn-out provision under the loan agreement on Valley River Center and borrowed an additional $20.0 million at a fixed rate of 5.64%. The loan proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit and for general corporate purposes.
On March 16, 2007, the Company issued $950.0 million in convertible senior notes ("Senior Notes") that mature on March 15, 2012. The Senior Notes bear interest at 3.25%, payable semiannually, are senior unsecured debt of the Company and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. The Senior Notes had an initial conversion price of $111.48. The proceeds were used to payoff the $250 million term loan, and to pay down the Company's line of credit. (See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources").
In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company purchased two capped calls ("Capped Calls") from affiliates of the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes for approximately $59.9 million. The Capped Calls effectively increased the conversion price of the Senior Notes to approximately $130.06, which represented a 40% premium to the March 12, 2007 closing price of $92.90 per common share of the Company. The Capped Calls are expected to generally reduce the potential dilution upon exchange of the Senior Notes in the event the market value per share of the Company's common stock, as measured under the terms of the relevant settlement date, is greater than the strike price of the Capped Calls.
On March 23, 2007, the Company used borrowings under the line of credit to pay off the $51.0 million interest only loan on Tucson La Encantada. On May 15, 2007, the Company placed a new $78.0 million loan on that property that bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.60% and matures on June 1, 2012. The loan proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit and for general corporate purposes.
On May 23, 2007, the Company borrowed an additional $72.5 million under the loan agreement on Deptford Mall at a fixed rate of 5.38%. The loan proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit and for general corporate purposes.
On July 2, 2007, the Company's joint venture in Scottsdale Fashion Square refinanced the loan on the property. The two existing loans on the property were replaced with a new $550.0 million loan bearing interest at a fixed rate of 5.66% and maturing July 8, 2013. The Company used its pro rata share of proceeds to pay down the Company's line of credit and for general corporate purposes.
Redevelopment and Development Activity:
The first phase of SanTan Village Regional Center opened on October 26, 2007. The 1.2 million square foot open-air super-regional shopping center opened with over 90% of the retail space committed, with Dillard's and more than 85 specialty retailers joining Harkins Theatres, which opened March 2007. The balance of the project, which includes Dick's Sporting Goods, Best Buy, Barnes & Noble and up to 13 restaurants, is expected to open in phases throughout 2008.
The first phase of The Promenade at Casa Grande, a 1 million square foot, 130 acre department store anchored hybrid center, located in Casa Grande, Arizona, opened on November 16, 2007. With ninety percent committed, the first phase of the project has approximately 550,000 square feet of mini-majors, including Dillard's, Target, J.C.Penney, Kohl's, Petsmart and Staples. The balance of the Center is expected to continue to open in phases throughout 2008.
3
The first phase of The Marketplace at Flagstaff Mall, a 435,000 square foot lifestyle expansion began opening in phases on October 19, 2007. Phase I delivered approximately 267,538 square feet of new retail space including Best Buy, Home Depot, Linens n Things, Marshalls, Old Navy, Petco and Shoe Pavilion. Phase II, which will consist of village shops, an entertainment plaza and pad space, is expected to be completed in 2009-2010.
On November 8, 2007, Freehold Raceway Mall opened the first phase of a combined expansion and renovation project that will add 96,000 square feet of new retail and restaurant uses to this regional center in New Jersey. The expansion, which is 85% committed, added nine new-to-market additions including: Borders, The Cheesecake Factory, P.F. Chang's, Jared The Galleria of Jewelry, The Territory Ahead, Ann Taylor, Chico's, Coldwater Creek and White House/Black Market. The balance of the project is expected to open throughout 2008.
Scottsdale Fashion Square, the 2 million square foot luxury flagship, is undergoing a $130 million redevelopment and expansion. Phase I of the redevelopment and expansion began September 2007 with demolition of the vacant anchor space acquired as a result of the Federated-May merger and an adjacent parking structure. A 60,000 square foot Barneys New York, the high-end retailer's first Arizona location, will anchor an additional 100,000 square feet of up to 30 new luxury shops, which is planned to open in Fall 2009 in an urban setting on Scottsdale Road. New first-to-market deals include Salvatore Ferragamo, Grand Luxe Café, CH Carolina Herrera, and Michael Kors. First-to-market retailers opening in the Spring 2008 will include Bottega Veneta, Jimmy Choo and Marciano.
Construction continues on the combined redevelopment, expansion and interior renovation of The Oaks, an upscale 1.0 million square foot super-regional shopping center in California's affluent Thousand Oaks. The market's first Nordstrom department store is under construction. Construction of a first-to-market, 138,000 square foot Nordstrom department store, two-level open-air retail, dining and entertainment venue and new multi-level parking structure at The Oaks continues on schedule toward a phased completion beginning Fall 2008.
In December 2007, the Company received full entitlements to proceed with plans for a redevelopment of Santa Monica Place. The regional center will be redeveloped as an open-air shopping and dining environment that will connect with the popular Third Street Promenade. The Santa Monica Place redevelopment has started and is moving forward with a projected Fall 2009 completion.
The Shopping Center Industry
General
There are several types of retail shopping centers, which are differentiated primarily based on size and marketing strategy. Regional shopping centers generally contain in excess of 400,000 square feet of GLA and are typically anchored by two or more department or large retail stores ("Anchors") and are referred to as "Regional Shopping Centers" or "Malls." Regional Shopping Centers also typically contain numerous diversified retail stores ("Mall Stores"), most of which are national or regional retailers typically located along corridors connecting the Anchors. Community Shopping Centers, also referred to as "strip centers" or "urban villages" or "specialty centers", are retail shopping centers that are designed to attract local or neighborhood customers and are typically anchored by one or more supermarkets, discount department stores and/or drug stores. Community Shopping Centers typically contain 100,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet of GLA. In addition, freestanding retail stores are located along the perimeter of the shopping centers ("Freestanding Stores"). Anchors, Mall and Freestanding Stores and other tenants typically contribute funds for the maintenance of the common areas, property taxes, insurance, advertising and other expenditures related to the operation of the shopping center.
4
Regional Shopping Centers
A Regional Shopping Center draws from its trade area by offering a variety of fashion merchandise, hard goods and services and entertainment, often in an enclosed, climate controlled environment with convenient parking. Regional Shopping Centers provide an array of retail shops and entertainment facilities and often serve as the town center and the preferred gathering place for community, charity, and promotional events.
Regional Shopping Centers have generally provided owners with relatively stable growth in income despite the cyclical nature of the retail business. This stability is due both to the diversity of tenants and to the typical dominance of Regional Shopping Centers in their trade areas.
Regional Shopping Centers have different strategies with regard to price, merchandise offered and tenant mix, and are generally tailored to meet the needs of their trade areas. Anchor tenants are located along common areas in a configuration designed to maximize consumer traffic for the benefit of the Mall Stores. Mall GLA, which generally refers to gross leasable area contiguous to the Anchors for tenants other than Anchors, is leased to a wide variety of smaller retailers. Mall Stores typically account for the majority of the revenues of a Regional Shopping Center.
Business of the Company
Strategy:
The Company has a four-pronged business strategy which focuses on the acquisition, leasing and management, redevelopment and development of Regional Shopping Centers.
Acquisitions. The Company focuses on well-located, quality regional shopping centers that are, or it believes can be, dominant in their trade area and have strong revenue enhancement potential. The Company subsequently seeks to improve operating performance and returns from these properties through leasing, management and redevelopment. Since its initial public offering, the Company has acquired interests in shopping centers nationwide. The Company believes that it is geographically well positioned to cultivate and maintain ongoing relationships with potential sellers and financial institutions and to act quickly when acquisition opportunities arise. (See "Recent Developments--Acquisitions and Dispositions").
Leasing and Management. The Company believes that the shopping center business requires specialized skills across a broad array of disciplines for effective and profitable operations. For this reason, the Company has developed a fully integrated real estate organization with in-house acquisition, accounting, development, finance, leasing, legal, marketing, property management and redevelopment expertise. In addition, the Company emphasizes a philosophy of decentralized property management, leasing and marketing performed by on-site professionals. The Company believes that this strategy results in the optimal operation, tenant mix and drawing power of each Center as well as the ability to quickly respond to changing competitive conditions of the Center's trade area.
The Company believes that on-site property managers can most effectively operate the Centers. Each Center's property manager is responsible for overseeing the operations, marketing, maintenance and security functions at the Center. Property managers focus special attention on controlling operating costs, a key element in the profitability of the Centers, and seek to develop strong relationships with and to be responsive to the needs of retailers.
Similarly, the Company generally utilizes on-site and regionally located leasing managers to better understand the market and the community in which a Center is located. The Company continually assesses and fine tunes each Center's tenant mix, identifies and replaces underperforming tenants and seeks to optimize existing tenant sizes and configurations.
5
On a selective basis, the Company provides property management and leasing services for third parties. The Company currently manages four malls for third party owners on a fee basis. In addition, the Company manages four community centers for a related party.
Redevelopment. One of the major components of the Company's growth strategy is its ability to redevelop acquired properties. For this reason, the Company has built a staff of redevelopment professionals who have primary responsibility for identifying redevelopment opportunities that will result in enhanced long-term financial returns and market position for the Centers. The redevelopment professionals oversee the design and construction of the projects in addition to obtaining required governmental approvals. (See "Recent Developments--Redevelopment and Development Activity").
Development. The Company pursues ground-up development projects on a selective basis. The Company has supplemented its strong acquisition, operations and redevelopment skills with its ground-up development expertise to further increase growth opportunities. (See "Recent Developments--Redevelopment and Development Activity").
The Centers
As of December 31, 2007, the Centers consist of 74 Regional Shopping Centers and 20 Community Shopping Centers aggregating approximately 80.7 million square feet of GLA. The 74 Regional Shopping Centers in the Company's portfolio average approximately 991,000 square feet of GLA and range in size from 2.2 million square feet of GLA at Tysons Corner Center to 323,455 square feet of GLA at Panorama Mall. The Company's 20 Community Shopping Centers have an average of approximately 249,000 square feet of GLA. After giving effect to the Rochester Redemption and the acquisition of The Shops at North Bridge (See Recent Developments), the Centers presently include 318 Anchors totaling approximately 41.6 million square feet of GLA and approximately 9,200 Mall and Freestanding Stores totaling approximately 35.1 million square feet of GLA.
Competition
There are numerous owners and developers of real estate that compete with the Company in its trade areas. There are six other publicly traded mall companies and several large private mall companies, any of which under certain circumstances could compete against the Company for an acquisition, an Anchor or a tenant. In addition, private equity firms compete with the Company in terms of acquisitions. This results in competition for both acquisition of centers and for tenants or Anchors to occupy space. The existence of competing shopping centers could have a material adverse impact on the Company's ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be achieved. There is also increasing competition from other retail formats and technologies, such as lifestyle centers, power centers, internet shopping and home shopping networks, factory outlet centers, discount shopping clubs and mail-order services that could adversely affect the Company's revenues.
In making leasing decisions, the Company believes that retailers consider the following material factors relating to a center: quality, design and location, including consumer demographics; rental rates; type and quality of Anchors and retailers at the center; and management and operational experience and strategy of the center. The Company believes it is able to compete effectively for retail tenants in its local markets based on these criteria in light of the overall size, quality and diversity of its portfolio of Centers.
Major Tenants
The Centers derived approximately 95.1% of their total minimum rents for the year ended December 31, 2007 from Mall and Freestanding Stores. One tenant accounted for approximately 3.3%
6
of minimum rents of the Company, and no other single tenant accounted for more than 2.7% of minimum rents as of December 31, 2007.
The following tenants (including their subsidiaries) represent the 10 largest tenants in the Company's portfolio (including joint ventures) based upon minimum rents in place as of December 31, 2007:
Tenant |
Primary DBA's |
Number of Locations in the Portfolio |
% of Total Annual Minimum Rents as of December 31, 2007(1) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mervyn's(2) | Mervyn's | 45 | 3.3 | % | |||
The Gap, Inc. | Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy | 103 | 2.7 | % | |||
Limited Brands, Inc. | Victoria Secret, Bath and Body | 146 | 2.3 | % | |||
Foot Locker, Inc. | Footlocker, Champs Sports, Lady Footlocker | 161 | 2.0 | % | |||
AT&T Mobility, LLC(3) | AT&T Wireless, Cingular Wireless | 33 | 1.5 | % | |||
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | Abercrombie & Fitch | 71 | 1.5 | % | |||
Luxottica Group S.P.A. | Lenscrafters, Sunglass Hut | 150 | 1.2 | % | |||
Zale Corporation | Zales, Piercing Pagoda, Gordon's Jewelers | 120 | 1.2 | % | |||
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | American Eagle Outfitters | 57 | 1.0 | % | |||
Signet Group | Kay Jewelers, Weisfield Jewelers | 76 | 1.0 | % |
Mall and Freestanding Stores
Mall and Freestanding Store leases generally provide for tenants to pay rent comprised of a base (or "minimum") rent and a percentage rent based on sales. In some cases, tenants pay only minimum rent, and in some cases, tenants pay only percentage rents. Historically, most leases for Mall and Freestanding Stores contain provisions that allow the Centers to recover their costs for maintenance of the common areas, property taxes, insurance, advertising and other expenditures related to the operations of the Center. Since January 2005, the Company generally began entering into leases which require tenants to pay a stated amount for such operating expenses, generally excluding property taxes, regardless of the expenses the Company actually incurs at any Center.
Tenant space of 10,000 square feet and under in the portfolio at December 31, 2007 comprises 69.1% of all Mall and Freestanding Store space. The Company uses tenant spaces of 10,000 square feet and under for comparing rental rate activity. The Company believes that to include space over 10,000 square feet would provide a less meaningful comparison.
When an existing lease expires, the Company is often able to enter into a new lease with a higher base rent component. The average base rent for new Mall and Freestanding Store leases at the consolidated Centers, 10,000 square feet and under, commencing during 2007 was $43.23 per square foot, or 26.4% higher than the average base rent for all Mall and Freestanding Stores at the consolidated Centers, 10,000 square feet and under, expiring during 2007 of $34.21 per square foot.
7
The following table sets forth for the Centers, the average base rent per square foot of Mall and Freestanding GLA, for tenants 10,000 square feet and under, as of December 31 for each of the past three years:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
Average Base Rent Per Square Foot(1) |
Avg. Base Rent Per Sq. Ft. on Leases Commencing During the Year(2) |
Avg. Base Rent Per Sq. Ft. on Leases Expiring During the Year(3) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consolidated Centers: | |||||||||
2007 | $ | 38.49 | $ | 43.23 | $ | 34.21 | |||
2006 | $ | 37.55 | $ | 38.40 | $ | 31.92 | |||
2005 | $ | 34.23 | $ | 35.60 | $ | 30.71 | |||
Joint Venture Centers: |
|||||||||
2007 | $ | 38.72 | $ | 47.12 | $ | 34.87 | |||
2006 | $ | 37.94 | $ | 41.43 | $ | 36.19 | |||
2005 | $ | 36.35 | $ | 39.08 | $ | 30.18 |
8
Cost of Occupancy
The Company's management believes that in order to maximize the Company's operating cash flow, the Centers' Mall Store tenants must be able to operate profitably. A major factor contributing to tenant profitability is cost of occupancy. The following table summarizes occupancy costs for Mall Store tenants in the Centers as a percentage of total Mall Store sales for the last three years:
|
For Years ended December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||
Consolidated Centers: | |||||||
Minimum Rents | 8.0 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.3 | % | |
Percentage Rents | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | |
Expense Recoveries(1) | 3.8 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.6 | % | |
12.2 | % | 12.2 | % | 12.4 | % | ||
Joint Venture Centers: |
|||||||
Minimum Rents | 7.3 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.4 | % | |
Percentage Rents | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.5 | % | |
Expense Recoveries(1) | 3.2 | % | 3.1 | % | 3.0 | % | |
11.0 | % | 10.9 | % | 10.9 | % | ||
Lease Expirations
The following tables show scheduled lease expirations (for Centers owned as of December 31, 2007) of Mall and Freestanding Stores (10,000 square feet and under) for the next ten years, assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options:
Consolidated Centers:
Year Ending December 31, |
Number of Leases Expiring |
Approximate GLA of Leases Expiring(1) |
% of Total Leased GLA Represented by Expiring Leases(1) |
Ending Base Rent per Square Foot of Expiring Leases(1) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 486 | 992,151 | 12.87 | % | $ | 35.14 | |||
2009 | 332 | 630,841 | 8.18 | % | $ | 38.93 | |||
2010 | 419 | 808,960 | 10.49 | % | $ | 41.24 | |||
2011 | 404 | 1,020,218 | 13.23 | % | $ | 37.76 | |||
2012 | 291 | 773,163 | 10.03 | % | $ | 37.20 | |||
2013 | 210 | 499,179 | 6.47 | % | $ | 41.65 | |||
2014 | 241 | 562,547 | 7.30 | % | $ | 49.88 | |||
2015 | 253 | 686,474 | 8.90 | % | $ | 46.69 | |||
2016 | 258 | 685,204 | 8.89 | % | $ | 40.56 | |||
2017 | 219 | 664,921 | 8.62 | % | $ | 38.92 |
9
Joint Venture Centers (at pro rata share):
Year Ending December 31, |
Number of Leases Expiring |
Approximate GLA of Leases Expiring(1) |
% of Total Leased GLA Represented by Expiring Leases(1) |
Ending Base Rent per Square Foot of Expiring Leases(1) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 493 | 497,910 | 12.42 | % | $ | 37.61 | |||
2009 | 393 | 428,120 | 10.68 | % | $ | 37.97 | |||
2010 | 416 | 425,003 | 10.60 | % | $ | 41.88 | |||
2011 | 369 | 434,833 | 10.85 | % | $ | 38.88 | |||
2012 | 301 | 322,453 | 8.05 | % | $ | 41.55 | |||
2013 | 225 | 262,946 | 6.56 | % | $ | 43.02 | |||
2014 | 221 | 266,419 | 6.65 | % | $ | 42.88 | |||
2015 | 232 | 291,919 | 7.28 | % | $ | 43.73 | |||
2016 | 288 | 356,072 | 8.88 | % | $ | 47.29 | |||
2017 | 236 | 352,911 | 8.81 | % | $ | 42.64 |
Anchors
Anchors have traditionally been a major factor in the public's identification with Regional Shopping Centers. Anchors are generally department stores whose merchandise appeals to a broad range of shoppers. Although the Centers receive a smaller percentage of their operating income from Anchors than from Mall and Freestanding Stores, strong Anchors play an important part in maintaining customer traffic and making the Centers desirable locations for Mall and Freestanding Store tenants.
Anchors either own their stores, the land under them and in some cases adjacent parking areas, or enter into long-term leases with an owner at rates that are lower than the rents charged to tenants of Mall and Freestanding Stores. Each Anchor, which owns its own store, and certain Anchors which lease their stores, enter into reciprocal easement agreements with the owner of the Center covering among other things, operational matters, initial construction and future expansion.
Anchors accounted for approximately 4.9% of the Company's total minimum rent for the year ended December 31, 2007.
10
The following table identifies each Anchor, each parent company that owns multiple Anchors and the number of square feet owned or leased by each such Anchor or parent company in the Company's portfolio at December 31, 2007, giving effect to the Rochester Redemption and the acquisition of The Shops at North Bridge:
Name(1) |
Number of Anchor Stores(1) |
GLA Owned by Anchor(1) |
GLA Leased by Anchor(1) |
Total GLA Occupied by Anchor(1) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macy's Inc. | ||||||||||
Macy's(2) | 54 | 6,046,168 | 2,920,001 | 8,966,169 | ||||||
Bloomingdale's | 1 | -- | 255,888 | 255,888 | ||||||
Total | 55 | 6,046,168 | 3,175,889 | 9,222,057 | ||||||
Sears Holdings Corporation | ||||||||||
Sears | 48 | 4,462,305 | 2,079,671 | 6,541,976 | ||||||
Great Indoors, The | 1 | -- | 131,051 | 131,051 | ||||||
K-Mart | 1 | -- | 86,479 | 86,479 | ||||||
Total | 50 | 4,462,305 | 2,297,201 | 6,759,506 | ||||||
J.C. Penney | 45 | 2,351,211 | 3,664,424 | 6,015,635 | ||||||
Dillard's | 26 | 3,574,852 | 918,235 | 4,493,087 | ||||||
Mervyn's(3) | 45 | 233,282 | 3,365,571 | 3,598,853 | ||||||
Nordstrom(4) | 13 | 699,127 | 1,526,369 | 2,225,496 | ||||||
Target(5) | 13 | 1,125,041 | 564,279 | 1,689,320 | ||||||
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. | ||||||||||
Younkers | 6 | -- | 609,177 | 609,177 | ||||||
Bon-Ton, The | 1 | -- | 71,222 | 71,222 | ||||||
Herberger's | 4 | 188,000 | 214,573 | 402,573 | ||||||
Total | 11 | 188,000 | 894,972 | 1,082,972 | ||||||
Gottschalks | 7 | 332,638 | 553,242 | 885,880 | ||||||
Boscov's | 3 | -- | 476,067 | 476,067 | ||||||
Wal-Mart | 3 | 371,527 | 100,709 | 472,236 | ||||||
Neiman Marcus | 3 | 120,000 | 321,450 | 441,450 | ||||||
Lord & Taylor | 3 | 120,635 | 199,372 | 320,007 | ||||||
Home Depot | 3 | 120,530 | 274,402 | 394,932 | ||||||
Kohl's | 3 | 165,279 | 114,359 | 279,638 | ||||||
Burlington Coat Factory | 3 | 186,570 | 74,585 | 261,155 | ||||||
Dick's Sporting Goods(6) | 3 | -- | 257,241 | 257,241 | ||||||
Von Maur | 3 | 186,686 | 59,563 | 246,249 | ||||||
Belk, Inc. | ||||||||||
Belk | 3 | -- | 200,925 | 200,925 | ||||||
La Curacao | 1 | 164,656 | -- | 164,656 | ||||||
Barneys New York(7) | 2 | -- | 141,398 | 141,398 | ||||||
Lowe's | 1 | 135,197 | -- | 135,197 | ||||||
Best Buy | 2 | 129,441 | -- | 129,441 | ||||||
Saks Fifth Avenue | 1 | -- | 92,000 | 92,000 | ||||||
L.L. Bean | 1 | -- | 75,778 | 75,778 | ||||||
Sports Authority | 1 | -- | 52,250 | 52,250 | ||||||
Bealls | 1 | -- | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Richman Gordman 1/2 Price | 1 | -- | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
Vacant(8) | 12 | -- | 1,426,844 | 1,426,844 | ||||||
Total | 318 | 20,713,145 | 20,927,125 | 41,640,270 | ||||||
11
Environmental Matters
Each of the Centers has been subjected to a Phase I audit (which involves review of publicly available information and general property inspections, but does not involve soil sampling or ground water analysis) completed by an environmental consultant.
Based on these audits, and on other information, the Company is aware of the following environmental issues that may reasonably result in costs associated with future investigation or remediation, or in environmental liability:
Insurance
Each of the Centers has comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance with insured limits customarily carried for similar properties. The Company does not insure certain types of losses (such as losses from wars), because they are either uninsurable or not economically insurable. In addition, while the Company or the relevant joint venture, as applicable, carries specific earthquake insurance on the Centers located in earthquake-prone zones, the policies are subject to a deductible equal to 5% of the total insured value of each Center, a $100,000 per occurrence minimum and a combined annual aggregate loss limit of $106.6 million on these Centers. While the Company or the relevant joint venture also carries terrorism insurance on the Centers, the policies are subject to a
12
$10,000 deductible and a combined annual aggregate loss of $800 million. Each Center has environmental insurance covering eligible third-party losses, remediation and non-owned disposal sites, subject to a $100,000 deductible and a $10 million three-year aggregate limit. Some environmental losses are not covered by this insurance because they are uninsurable or not economically insurable. Furthermore, the Company carries title insurance on substantially all of the Centers for less than their full value.
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), commencing with its first taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and intends to conduct its operations so as to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal and state income taxes on its net taxable income that it currently distributes to stockholders. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on the Company's ability to meet certain dividend distribution tests, share ownership requirements and various qualification tests prescribed in the Code.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, the Company and the Management Companies employed 3,014 persons, including executive officers (11), personnel in the areas of acquisitions and business development (26), property management/marketing (489), leasing (200), redevelopment/development (81), financial services (281) and legal affairs (65). In addition, in an effort to minimize operating costs, the Company generally maintains its own security and guest services staff (1,842) and in some cases maintenance staff (19). Unions represent six of these employees. The Company primarily engages a third party to handle maintenance at the Centers. The Company believes that relations with its employees are good.
Available Information; Website Disclosure; Corporate Governance Documents
The Company's corporate website address is www.macerich.com. The Company makes available free-of-charge through this website its reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and all amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports have been filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are available under the heading "Investing--SEC Filings", through a free hyperlink to a third-party service.
The following documents relating to Corporate Governance are available on the Company's website at www.macerich.com under "Investing--Corporate Governance":
Guidelines
on Corporate Governance
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers
Audit Committee Charter
Compensation Committee Charter
Executive Committee Charter
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
You may also request copies of any of these documents by writing to:
Attention:
Corporate Secretary
The Macerich Company
401Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Certifications
The Company submitted a Section 303A.12 (a) CEO Certification to the New York Stock Exchange last year. In addition, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the CEO/CFO certification required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and it is included as Exhibit 31 hereto.
13
We invest primarily in shopping centers, which are subject to a number of significant risks that are beyond our control.
Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk that may affect the ability of our Centers to generate sufficient revenues to meet operating and other expenses, including debt service, lease payments, capital expenditures and tenant improvements, and to make distributions to us and our stockholders. Centers wholly owned by us are referred to as "Wholly Owned Centers" and Centers that are partly but not wholly owned by us are referred to as "Joint Venture Centers." A number of factors may decrease the income generated by the Centers, including:
Income from shopping center properties and shopping center values are also affected by applicable laws and regulations, including tax, environmental, safety and zoning laws, and by interest rate levels and the availability and cost of financing. In addition, the number of prospective buyers interested in purchasing shopping centers is limited. Therefore, if we want to sell one or more of our Centers, we may not be able to dispose of it in the desired time period and may receive less consideration than we originally invested in the Center. Furthermore, real estate investments are relative illiquid. This characteristic tends to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
Some of our Centers are geographically concentrated and, as a result, are sensitive to local economic and real estate conditions.
A significant percentage of our Centers are located in California and Arizona and eight Centers in the aggregate are located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. To the extent that weak economic or real estate conditions, including as a result of the factors described in the preceding risk factor, or other factors affect California, Arizona, New York, New Jersey or Connecticut (or their respective regions) more severely than other areas of the country, our financial performance could be negatively impacted.
We are in a competitive business.
There are numerous owners and developers of real estate that compete with us in our trade areas. There are six other publicly traded mall companies and several large private mall companies, any of which under certain circumstances could compete against us for an acquisition, an Anchor or a tenant. In addition, private equity firms compete with us in terms of acquisitions. This results in competition for both acquisition of centers and for tenants or Anchors to occupy space. The existence of competing shopping centers could have a material adverse impact on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents that can be achieved. There is also increasing competition from other retail formats and technologies, such as lifestyle centers, power centers, internet shopping and home shopping networks,
14
factory outlet centers, discount shopping clubs and mail-order services that could adversely affect our revenues.
Our Centers depend on tenants to generate rental revenues.
Our revenues and funds available for distribution will be reduced if:
A decision by an Anchor, or other significant tenant to cease operations at a Center could also have an adverse effect on our financial condition. The closing of an Anchor or other significant tenant may allow other Anchors and/or other tenants to terminate their leases, seek rent relief and/or cease operating their stores at the Center or otherwise adversely affect occupancy at the Center. In addition, Anchors and/or tenants at one or more Centers might terminate their leases as a result of mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, dispositions or bankruptcies in the retail industry. The bankruptcy and/or closure of retail stores, or sale of an Anchor or store to a less desirable retailer, may reduce occupancy levels, customer traffic and rental income, or otherwise adversely affect our financial performance. Furthermore, if the store sales of retailers operating in the Centers decline sufficiently, tenants might be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of a default by a lessee, the affected Center may experience delays and costs in enforcing its rights as lessor.
Our acquisition and real estate development strategies may not be successful.
Our historical growth in revenues, net income and funds from operations has been closely tied to the acquisition and redevelopment of shopping centers. Many factors, including the availability and cost of capital, our total amount of debt outstanding, interest rates and the availability of attractive acquisition targets, among others, will affect our ability to acquire and redevelop additional properties in the future. We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition opportunities, and newly acquired properties may not perform as well as expected. Expenses arising from our efforts to complete acquisitions, redevelop properties or increase our market penetration may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We face competition for acquisitions primarily from other REITs, as well as from private real estate companies and financial buyers. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources. Increased competition for shopping center acquisitions may impact adversely our ability to acquire additional properties on favorable terms. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to implement our growth strategy successfully or manage our expanded operations effectively and profitably.
We may not be able to achieve the anticipated financial and operating results from newly acquired assets. Some of the factors that could affect anticipated results are:
Our business strategy also includes the selective development and construction of retail properties. Any development, redevelopment and construction activities that we may undertake will be subject to the risks of real estate development, including lack of financing, construction delays, environmental
15
requirements, budget overruns, sunk costs and lease-up. Furthermore, occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable. Real estate development activities are also subject to risks relating to the inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, and occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations. If any of the above events occur, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders and service our indebtedness could be adversely affected.
We have substantial debt that could affect our future operations.
Our total outstanding loan indebtedness at December 31, 2007 was $7.6 billion (including $1.8 billion of our pro rata share of joint venture debt). As a result of this substantial indebtedness, we are required to use a material portion of our cash flow to service principal and interest on our debt, which limits the cash flow available for other business opportunities. In addition, we are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service and that rising interest rates could adversely affect our debt service costs. A majority of our Centers are mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness, and if income from the Center is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the Center could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value.
We depend on external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements.
We depend primarily on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund the growth of our business and to ensure that we can meet ongoing maturities of our outstanding debt. Our access to financing depends on the willingness of banks to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets in general. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the financing we need for future growth or to meet our debt service as obligations mature, or that the financing available to us will be on acceptable terms.
Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
If inflation increases in the future, we may experience any or all of the following:
Certain individuals have substantial influence over the management of both us and the Operating Partnership, which may create conflicts of interest.
Under the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, we, as the sole general partner, are responsible for the management of the Operating Partnership's business and affairs. Each of the principals serves as an executive officer and is a member of our board of directors. Accordingly, these principals have substantial influence over our management and the management of the Operating Partnership.
The tax consequences of the sale of some of the Centers may create conflicts of interest.
The principals will experience negative tax consequences if some of the Centers are sold. As a result, the principals may not favor a sale of these Centers even though such a sale may benefit our other stockholders.
16
The guarantees of indebtedness by and certain holdings of the principals may create conflicts of interest.
The principals have guaranteed mortgage loans encumbering one of the Centers. As of December 31, 2007, the principals have guaranteed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $21.8 million. The existence of guarantees of these loans by the principals could result in the principals having interests that are inconsistent with the interests of our stockholders.
The principals may have different interests than our stockholders because they are significant holders of the Operating Partnership.
If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we will have reduced funds available for distributions to our stockholders.
We believe that we currently qualify as a REIT. No assurance can be given that we will remain qualified as a REIT. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable income tax regulations is greater in the case of a REIT structure like ours that holds assets in partnership form. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, including determinations by our partners in the Joint Venture Centers, may affect our continued qualification as a REIT. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to our qualification as a REIT or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of that qualification.
If in any taxable year we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we will suffer the following negative results:
In addition, if we were to lose our REIT status, we will be prohibited from qualifying as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost, absent relief under statutory provisions. As a result, net income and the funds available for distributions to our stockholders would be reduced for at least five years and the fair market value of our shares could be materially adversely affected. Furthermore, the Internal Revenue Service could challenge our REIT status for past periods, which if successful could result in us owing a material amount of tax for prior periods. It is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations might cause our board of directors to revoke our REIT election.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we might face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow. Further, we might be subject to federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders.
Complying with REIT requirements might cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the nature of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may also be required to make distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with REIT requirements may cause us to forego opportunities we would otherwise pursue.
17
In addition, the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose a 100% tax on income from "prohibited transactions." Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets that constitute inventory or other property held for sale in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property. This 100% tax could impact our desire to sell assets and other investments at otherwise opportune times if we believe such sales could be considered a prohibited transaction.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to borrow to make distributions to our stockholders.
As a REIT, we generally must distribute 90% of our annual taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to our stockholders. From time to time, we might generate taxable income greater than our net income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income might be greater than our cash flow available for distributions to our stockholders. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we might be unable to distribute 90% of our taxable income as required by the REIT rules. In that case, we would need to borrow funds, sell a portion of our investments (potentially at disadvantageous prices) or find another alternative source of funds. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity and reduce amounts for investments.
Outside partners in Joint Venture Centers result in additional risks to our stockholders.
We own partial interests in property partnerships that own 42 Joint Venture Centers as well as fee title to a site that is ground leased to a property partnership that owns a Joint Venture Center and several development sites. We may acquire partial interests in additional properties through joint venture arrangements. Investments in Centers that are not Wholly Owned Centers involve risks different from those of investments in Wholly Owned Centers.
We may have fiduciary responsibilities to our partners that could affect decisions concerning the Joint Venture Centers. Third parties may share control of major decisions relating to the Joint Venture Centers, including decisions with respect to sales, refinancings and the timing and amount of additional capital contributions, as well as decisions that could have an adverse impact on our status. For example, we may lose our management rights relating to the Joint Venture Centers if:
In addition, some of our outside partners control the day-to-day operations of eight Joint Venture Centers (NorthPark Center, West Acres Center, Eastland Mall, Granite Run Mall, Lake Square Mall, NorthPark Mall, South Park Mall and Valley Mall). We, therefore, do not control cash distributions from these Centers, and the lack of cash distributions from these Centers could jeopardize our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Furthermore, certain Joint Venture Centers have debt that could become recourse debt to us if the Joint Venture Center is unable to discharge such debt obligation.
Our holding company structure makes us dependent on distributions from the Operating Partnership.
Because we conduct our operations through the Operating Partnership, our ability to service our debt obligations and pay dividends to our stockholders is strictly dependent upon the earnings and cash flows of the Operating Partnership and the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions to us. Under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, the Operating Partnership is prohibited from making any distribution to us to the extent that at the time of the distribution, after giving effect to the distribution, all liabilities of the Operating Partnership (other than some
18
non-recourse liabilities and some liabilities to the partners) exceed the fair value of the assets of the Operating Partnership. An inability to make cash distributions from the Operating Partnership could jeopardize our ability to maintain qualification as a REIT.
Possible environmental liabilities could adversely affect us.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in that real property. These laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remedy environmental hazards properly, may adversely affect the owner's or operator's ability to sell or rent affected real property or to borrow money using affected real property as collateral.
Persons or entities that arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not that facility is owned or operated by the person or entity arranging for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. Laws exist that impose liability for release of ACMs into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real property for personal injury associated with exposure to ACMs. In connection with our ownership, operation, management, development and redevelopment of the Centers, or any other centers or properties we acquire in the future, we may be potentially liable under these laws and may incur costs in responding to these liabilities.
Uninsured losses could adversely affect our financial condition.
Each of our Centers has comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance with insured limits customarily carried for similar properties. We do not insure certain types of losses (such as losses from wars), because they are either uninsurable or not economically insurable. In addition, while we or the relevant joint venture, as applicable, carry earthquake insurance on the Centers located in California, the policies are subject to a deductible equal to 5% of the total insured value of each Center, a $100,000 per occurrence minimum and a combined annual aggregate loss limit of $106.6 million on these Centers. While we or the relevant joint venture also carries terrorism insurance on the Centers, the policies are subject to a $10,000 deductible and a combined annual aggregate loss limit of $800 million. Each Center has environmental insurance covering eligible third-party losses, remediation and non-owned disposal sites, subject to a $100,000 deductible and a $10 million three-year aggregate limit. Some environmental losses are not covered by this insurance because they are uninsurable or not economically insurable. Furthermore, we carry title insurance on many of the Centers for less than their full value. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, the entity that owns the affected Center could lose its capital invested in the Center, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the Center, while remaining obligated for any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related to the Center. An uninsured loss or loss in excess of insured limits may negatively impact our financial condition.
As the general partner of the Operating Partnership and certain of the property partnerships, we are generally liable for any of its unsatisfied obligations other than non-recourse obligations.
An ownership limit and certain anti-takeover defenses could inhibit a change of control or reduce the value of our common stock.
The Ownership Limit. In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock (after taking into account options to acquire stock) may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include
19
some entities that would not ordinarily be considered "individuals") during the last half of a taxable year. Our Charter restricts ownership of more than 5% (the "Ownership Limit") of the lesser of the number or value of our outstanding shares of stock by any single stockholder or a group of stockholders (with limited exceptions for some holders of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, and their respective families and affiliated entities, including all four principals). In addition to enhancing preservation of our status as a REIT, the Ownership Limit may:
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may waive or modify (subject to limitations) the Ownership Limit with respect to one or more of our stockholders, if it is satisfied that ownership in excess of this limit will not jeopardize our status as a REIT.
Stockholder Rights Plan and Selected Provisions of our Charter and Bylaws. Agreements to which we are a party, as well as some of the provisions of our Charter and bylaws, may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us and may inhibit a change in control that some, or a majority, of our stockholders might believe to be in their best interest or that could give our stockholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market prices for our shares. These agreements and provisions include the following:
Selected Provisions of Maryland Law. The Maryland General Corporation Law prohibits business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder (which includes any person who beneficially holds 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation's shares) or its affiliates for five years following the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder and, after the five-year period, requires the recommendation of the board of directors and two super-majority stockholder votes to approve a business combination unless the stockholders receive a minimum price determined by the statute. As permitted by Maryland law, our Charter exempts from
20
these provisions any business combination between us and the principals and their respective affiliates and related persons. Maryland law also allows the board of directors to exempt particular business combinations before the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Furthermore, a person is not an interested stockholder if the transaction by which he or she would otherwise have become an interested stockholder is approved in advance by the board of directors.
The Maryland General Corporation Law also provides that the acquirer of certain levels of voting power in electing directors of a Maryland corporation (one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority and a majority or more) is not entitled to vote the shares in excess of the applicable threshold, unless voting rights for the shares are approved by holders of two thirds of the disinterested shares or unless the acquisition of the shares has been specifically or generally approved or exempted from the statute by a provision in our Charter or bylaws adopted before the acquisition of the shares. Our Charter exempts from these provisions voting rights of shares owned or acquired by the principals and their respective affiliates and related persons. Our bylaws also contain a provision exempting from this statute any acquisition by any person of shares of our common stock. There can be no assurance that this bylaw will not be amended or eliminated in the future. The Maryland General Corporation Law and our Charter also contain supermajority voting requirements with respect to our ability to amend our Charter, dissolve, merge, or sell all or substantially all of our assets.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not Applicable
21
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Centers and other locations that are wholly-owned or partly owned by the Company:
Company's Ownership(1) |
Name of Center/ Location(2) |
Year of Original Construction/ Acquisition |
Year of Most Recent Expansion/ Renovation |
Total GLA(3) |
Mall and Freestanding GLA |
Percentage of Mall and Freestanding GLA Leased |
Anchors |
Sales Per Square Foot(4) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHOLLY OWNED: | ||||||||||||||||||
100 | % | Capitola Mall(5) Capitola, California |
1977/1995 | 1988 | 586,653 | 196,936 | 92.7 | % | Gottschalks, Macy's, Mervyn's, Sears | $ | 351 | |||||||
100 | % | Chandler Fashion Center Chandler, Arizona |
2001/2002 | -- | 1,325,450 | 640,290 | 97.6 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Nordstrom, Sears | 653 | ||||||||
100 | % | Chesterfield Towne Center(6) Richmond, Virginia |
1975/1994 | 2000 | 1,035,593 | 426,858 | 80.0 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Sears, J.C. Penney | 349 | ||||||||
100 | % | Danbury Fair Mall(6) Danbury, Connecticut |
1986/2005 | 1991 | 1,295,086 | 498,878 | 97.1 | % | J.C. Penney, Lord & Taylor, Macy's, Sears | 589 | ||||||||
100 | % | Deptford Mall Deptford, New Jersey |
1975/2006 | 1990 | 1,033,224 | 336,782 | 97.3 | % | Boscov's, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | 521 | ||||||||
100 | % | Fiesta Mall(7) Mesa, Arizona |
1979/2004 | 2007 | 827,873 | 309,682 | 93.0 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Sears | 375 | ||||||||
100 | % | Flagstaff Mall Flagstaff, Arizona |
1979/2002 | 2007 | 343,599 | 139,587 | 92.6 | % | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Sears | 382 | ||||||||
100 | % | FlatIron Crossing(6) Broomfield, Colorado |
2000/2002 | -- | 1,505,617 | 741,876 | 91.6 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Nordstrom, Dick's Sporting Goods | 472 | ||||||||
100 | % | Freehold Raceway Mall Freehold, New Jersey |
1990/2005 | 2007 | 1,654,364 | 862,740 | 96.5 | % | J.C. Penney, Lord & Taylor, Macy's, Nordstrom, Sears | 520 | ||||||||
100 | % | Fresno Fashion Fair Fresno, California |
1970/1996 | 2006 | 955,807 | 394,926 | 99.2 | % | Gottschalks, J.C. Penney, Macy's (two) | 545 | ||||||||
100 | % | Great Northern Mall(6) Clay, New York |
1988/2005 | -- | 893,970 | 563,982 | 94.7 | % | Macy's, Sears | 268 | ||||||||
100 | % | Green Tree Mall Clarksville, Indiana |
1968/1975 | 2005 | 797,126 | 291,541 | 77.7 | % | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Sears, Burlington Coat Factory | 411 | ||||||||
100 | % | La Cumbre Plaza(5) Santa Barbara, California |
1967/2004 | 1989 | 495,736 | 178,736 | 88.3 | % | Macy's, Sears | 446 | ||||||||
100 | % | Northgate Mall(5) San Rafael, California |
1964/1986 | 1987 | 732,543 | 262,212 | 92.6 | % | Macy's, Mervyn's, Sears | 397 | ||||||||
100 | % | Northridge Mall Salinas, California |
1972/2003 | 1994 | 892,859 | 355,879 | 98.5 | % | J.C. Penney, Macy's, Mervyn's, Sears | 350 | ||||||||
100 | % | Pacific View Ventura, California |
1965/1996 | 2001 | 1,059,916 | 411,102 | 73.7 | % | J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears, Target(8) | 433 | ||||||||
100 | % | Panorama Mall Panorama, California |
1955/1979 | 2005 | 323,455 | 158,455 | 92.9 | % | Wal-Mart | 358 | ||||||||
100 | % | Paradise Valley Mall(6) Phoenix, Arizona |
1979/2002 | 1990 | 1,222,507 | 417,079 | 92.1 | % | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | 368 | ||||||||
100 | % | Prescott Gateway Prescott, Arizona |
2002/2002 | 2004 | 589,025 | 344,837 | 89.8 | % | Dillard's, Sears, J.C. Penney | 276 | ||||||||
100 | % | Queens Center(5) Queens, New York |
1973/1995 | 2004 | 961,559 | 406,792 | 97.7 | % | J.C. Penney, Macy's | 845 | ||||||||
100 | % | Rimrock Mall Billings, Montana |
1978/1996 | 1999 | 605,759 | 294,089 | 87.6 | % | Dillard's (two), Herberger's, J.C. Penney | 380 | ||||||||
100 | % | Rotterdam Square Schenectady, New York |
1980/2005 | 1990 | 582,939 | 273,164 | 89.8 | % | Macy's, K-Mart, Sears | 260 | ||||||||
100 | % | Salisbury, Centre at Salisbury, Maryland |
1990/1995 | 2005 | 852,205 | 354,789 | 94.8 | % | Boscov's, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | 371 | ||||||||
100 | % | Somersville Towne Center Antioch, California |
1966/1986 | 2004 | 502,709 | 174,487 | 92.5 | % | Sears, Gottschalks, Mervyn's, Macy's | 405 | ||||||||
100 | % | South Plains Mall(5) Lubbock, Texas |
1972/1998 | 1995 | 1,142,545 | 400,758 | 88.5 | % | Bealls, Dillard's (two), J.C. Penney, Mervyn's, Sears | 370 | ||||||||
100 | % | South Towne Center Sandy, Utah |
1987/1997 | 1997 | 1,268,136 | 491,624 | 95.6 | % | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Mervyn's, Target, Macy's | 433 | ||||||||
100 | % | Towne Mall Elizabethtown, Kentucky |
1985/2005 | 1989 | 353,232 | 182,360 | 91.2 | % | J.C. Penney, Belk, Sears | 298 | ||||||||
100 | % | Twenty Ninth Street(5) Boulder, Colorado |
1963/1979 | 2007 | 827,497 | 535,843 | 91.6 | % | Macy's, Home Depot | 428 | ||||||||
100 | % | Valley River Center Eugene, Oregon |
1969/2006 | 2007 | 910,841 | 334,777 | 89.6 | % | Sports Authority, Gottschalks, Macy's, J.C. Penney | 463 |
22
100 | % | Valley View Center Dallas, Texas |
1973/1996 | 2004 | 1,635,449 | 577,552 | 95.9 | % | Dillard's, Macy's(9), J.C. Penney, Sears | $ | 273 | |||||||
100 | % | Victor Valley, Mall of Victorville, California |
1986/2004 | 2001 | 543,295 | 269,446 | 94.7 | % | Gottschalks, J.C. Penney, Mervyn's, Sears | 480 | ||||||||
100 | % | Vintage Faire Mall Modesto, California |
1977/1996 | 2001 | 1,084,422 | 384,503 | 97.2 | % | Gottschalks, J.C. Penney, Macy's (two), Sears | 562 | ||||||||
100 | % | Westside Pavilion Los Angeles, California |
1985/1998 | 2007 | 739,746 | 381,618 | 95.8 | % | Nordstrom, Macy's | 481 | ||||||||
100 | % | Wilton Mall at Saratoga(6) Saratoga Springs, New York |
1990/2005 | 1998 | 745,267 | 457,201 | 96.0 | % | The Bon-Ton, J.C. Penney, Sears | 325 | ||||||||
Total/Average Wholly Owned | 30,326,004 | 13,051,381 | 92.7 | % | $ | 453 | ||||||||||||
JOINT VENTURES (VARIOUS PARTNERS): |
||||||||||||||||||
33.3 | % | Arrowhead Towne Center Glendale, Arizona |
1993/2002 | 2004 | 1,204,862 | 396,448 | 98.5 | % | Dick's Sporting Goods(10), Dillard's, Macy's, J.C. Penney, Sears, Mervyn's | $ | 611 | |||||||
50 | % | Biltmore Fashion Park Phoenix, Arizona |
1963/2003 | 2006 | 608,934 | 303,934 | 78.4 | % | Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue | 821 | ||||||||
50 | % | Broadway Plaza(5) Walnut Creek, California |
1951/1985 | 1994 | 697,981 | 252,484 | 97.8 | % | Macy's (two), Nordstrom | 768 | ||||||||
50.1 | % | Corte Madera, Village at Corte Madera, California |
1985/1998 | 2005 | 439,573 | 221,573 | 90.4 | % | Macy's, Nordstrom | 875 | ||||||||
50 | % | Desert Sky Mall Phoenix, Arizona |
1981/2002 | 2007 | 893,457 | 282,962 | 93.6 | % | Sears, Dillard's, Burlington Coat Factory, Mervyn's, La Curacao | 323 | ||||||||
50 | % | Inland Center(5) San Bernardino, California |
1966/2004 | 2004 | 987,872 | 204,198 | 95.0 | % | Macy's, Sears, Gottschalks, Mervyn's(11) | 463 | ||||||||
15 | % | Metrocenter Mall(5) Phoenix, Arizona |
1973/2005 | 2006 | 1,122,959 | 595,710 | 90.2 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Sears | 345 | ||||||||
50 | % | NorthPark Center(5) Dallas, Texas |
1965/2004 | 2005 | 1,963,326 | 911,006 | 96.8 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Barneys New York | 694 | ||||||||
50 | % | Ridgmar Fort Worth, Texas |
1976/2005 | 2000 | 1,277,280 | 403,307 | 82.0 | % | Dillard's, Macy's, J.C. Penney, Neiman Marcus, Sears | 323 | ||||||||
50 | % | Scottsdale Fashion Square(12) Scottsdale, Arizona |
1961/2002 | 2007 | 1,840,182 | 857,902 | 94.1 | % | Barneys New York(13) Dillard's, Macy's Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus | 736 | ||||||||
33.3 | % | Superstition Springs Center(5) Mesa, Arizona |
1990/2002 | 2002 | 1,285,839 | 439,300 | 98.7 | % | Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard's, Macy's, J.C. Penney, Sears, Mervyn's, Best Buy | 425 | ||||||||
50 | % | Tysons Corner Center(5) McLean, Virginia |
1990/2005 | 2005 | 2,198,039 | 1,309,797 | 98.8 | % | Bloomingdale's, Macy's, L.L. Bean, Lord & Taylor, Nordstrom | 721 | ||||||||
19 | % | West Acres Fargo, North Dakota |
1972/1986 | 2001 | 970,707 | 418,152 | 99.2 | % | Macy's, Herberger's, J.C. Penney, Sears | 475 | ||||||||
Total/Average Joint Ventures (Various Partners) | 15,491,011 | 6,596,773 | 94.5 | % | 596 | |||||||||||||
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST PROPERTIES: |
||||||||||||||||||
51 | % | Cascade Mall Burlington, Washington |
1989/1999 | 1998 | 587,174 | 262,938 | 90.7 | % | Macy's (two), J.C. Penney, Sears, Target | 355 | ||||||||
51 | % | Kitsap Mall(5) Silverdale, Washington |
1985/1999 | 1997 | 846,940 | 386,957 | 95.0 | % | Macy's, J.C. Penney, Kohl's, Sears | 407 | ||||||||
51 | % | Lakewood Mall(5)(6) Lakewood, California |
1953/1975 | 2001 | 2,088,228 | 980,244 | 96.0 | % | Home Depot, Target, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Mervyn's | 441 | ||||||||
51 | % | Los Cerritos Center(6) Cerritos, California |
1971/1999 | 1998 | 1,290,420 | 489,139 | 95.0 | % | Macy's, Mervyn's, Nordstrom, Sears | 553 | ||||||||
51 | % | Redmond Town Center(5)(12) Redmond, Washington |
1997/1999 | 2000 | 1,283,683 | 1,173,683 | 97.6 | % | Macy's | 382 | ||||||||
51 | % | Stonewood Mall(5) Downey, California |
1953/1997 | 1991 | 930,655 | 359,908 | 97.8 | % | J.C. Penney, Mervyn's, Macy's, Sears | 449 |
23
51 | % | Washington Square Portland, Oregon |
1974/1999 | 2005 | 1,455,317 | 520,290 | 88.1 | % | J.C. Penney, Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods(10), Nordstrom, Sears | $ | 709 | |||||||
Total/Average Pacific Premier Retail Trust Properties | 8,482,417 | 4,173,159 | 95.1 | % | $ | 485 | ||||||||||||
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P. PROPERTIES: |
||||||||||||||||||
50 | % | Eastland Mall(5) Evansville, Indiana |
1978/1998 | 1996 | 1,040,025 | 550,881 | 94.9 | % | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Macy's | $ | 371 | |||||||
50 | % | Empire Mall(5) Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
1975/1998 | 2000 | 1,363,110 | 617,588 | 96.1 | % | Macy's, J.C. Penney, Richman-Gordmans 1/2 Price, Kohl's, Sears, Target, Younkers | 390 | ||||||||
50 | % | Granite Run Mall Media, Pennsylvania |
1974/1998 | 1993 | 1,036,166 | 535,357 | 90.1 | % | Boscov's, J.C. Penney, Sears | 287 | ||||||||
50 | % | Lake Square Mall Leesburg, Florida |
1980/1998 | 1995 | 553,019 | 256,982 | 79.1 | % | Belk, J.C. Penney, Sears, Target | 276 | ||||||||
50 | % | Lindale Mall Cedar Rapids, Iowa |
1963/1998 | 1997 | 688,394 | 382,831 | 90.3 | % | Sears, Von Maur, Younkers | 318 | ||||||||
50 | % | Mesa Mall Grand Junction, Colorado |
1980/1998 | 2003 | 836,721 | 395,513 | 94.0 | % | Herberger's, J.C. Penney, Mervyn's, Sears, Target | 433 | ||||||||
50 | % | NorthPark Mall Davenport, Iowa |
1973/1998 | 2001 | 1,073,035 | 422,579 | 86.7 | % | J.C. Penney, Dillard's, Sears, Von Maur, Younkers | 271 | ||||||||
50 | % | Rushmore Mall Rapid City, South Dakota |
1978/1998 | 1992 | 832,582 | 427,922 | 94.2 | % | Herberger's, J.C. Penney, Sears, Target | 361 | ||||||||
50 | % | Southern Hills Mall Sioux City, Iowa |
1980/1998 | 2003 | 798,856 | 485,279 | 91.0 | % | Sears, Younkers, J.C. Penney | 309 | ||||||||
50 | % | SouthPark Mall Moline, Illinois |
1974/1998 | 1990 | 1,024,004 | 445,948 | 83.8 | % | J.C. Penney, Sears, Younkers, Von Maur, Dillard's | 222 | ||||||||
50 | % | SouthRidge Mall Des Moines, Iowa |
1975/1998 | 1998 | 869,390 | 480,638 | 83.1 | % | Sears, Younkers, J.C. Penney, Target | 182 | ||||||||
50 | % | Valley Mall(6) Harrisonburg, Virginia |
1978/1998 | 1992 | 505,792 | 190,714 | 87.2 | % | Belk, J.C. Penney, Target | 270 | ||||||||
Total/Average SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. Properties | 10,621,094 | 5,192,232 | 89.9 | % | $ | 317 | ||||||||||||
Total/Average Joint Ventures | 34,594,522 | 15,962,164 | 93.2 | % | $ | 483 | ||||||||||||
Total/Average before Community Centers | 64,920,526 | 29,013,545 | 93.0 | % | $ | 469 | ||||||||||||
COMMUNITY / SPECIALTY CENTERS: |
||||||||||||||||||
100 | % | Borgata, The Scottsdale, Arizona |
1981/2002 | 2006 | 93,628 | 93,628 | 83.2 | % | -- | $ | 501 | |||||||
50 | % | Boulevard Shops Chandler, Arizona |
2001/2002 | 2004 | 180,823 | 180,823 | 100.0 | % | -- | 421 | ||||||||
75 | % | Camelback Colonnade Phoenix, Arizona |
1961/2002 | 1994 | 624,101 | 544,101 | 99.7 | % | Mervyn's | 330 | ||||||||
100 | % | Carmel Plaza Carmel, California |
1974/1998 | 2006 | 111,150 | 111,150 | 81.5 | % | -- | 551 | ||||||||
50 | % | Chandler Festival Chandler, Arizona |
2001/2002 | -- | 503,735 | 368,538 | 98.6 | % | Lowe's | 287 | ||||||||
50 | % | Chandler Gateway Chandler, Arizona |
2001/2002 | -- | 255,289 | 124,238 | 100.0 | % | The Great Indoors | 396 | ||||||||
50 | % | Chandler Village Center Chandler, Arizona |
2004/2002 | 2006 | 273,418 | 130,285 | 100.0 | % | Target | 212 | ||||||||
100 | % | Flagstaff Mall, The Marketplace at Flagstaff, Arizona |
2007/-- | 2007 | 267,538 | 147,008 | 100.0 | % | Home Depot | N/A | ||||||||
100 | % | Hilton Village(5)(12) Scottsdale, Arizona |
1982/2002 | -- | 96,546 | 96,546 | 97.1 | % | -- | 500 | ||||||||
24.5 | % | Kierland Commons Scottsdale, Arizona |
1999/2005 | 2003 | 435,022 | 435,022 | 100.0 | % | -- | 755 | ||||||||
100 | % | Paradise Village Office Park II Phoenix, Arizona |
1982/2002 | -- | 46,834 | 46,834 | 97.2 | % | -- | N/A | ||||||||
34.9 | % | SanTan Village Power Center Gilbert, Arizona |
2004/2004 | 2007 | 491,037 | 284,510 | 100.0 | % | Wal-Mart | 268 |
24
100 | % | Tucson La Encantada Tucson, Arizona |
2002/2002 | 2005 | 250,624 | 250,624 | 89.5 | % | -- | $ | 672 | |||||||
100 | % | Village Center Phoenix, Arizona |
1985/2002 | -- | 170,801 | 59,055 | 100.0 | % | Target | 325 | ||||||||
100 | % | Village Crossroads Phoenix, Arizona |
1993/2002 | -- | 185,186 | 84,477 | 91.6 | % | Wal-Mart | 286 | ||||||||
100 | % | Village Fair Phoenix, Arizona |
1989/2002 | -- | 271,417 | 207,817 | 97.1 | % | Best Buy | 235 | ||||||||
100 | % | Village Plaza Phoenix, Arizona |
1978/2002 | -- | 79,754 | 79,754 | 96.8 | % | -- | 314 | ||||||||
100 | % | Village Square I Phoenix, Arizona |
1978/2002 | -- | 21,606 | 21,606 | 100.0 | % | -- | 185 | ||||||||
100 | % | Village Square II(5) Phoenix, Arizona |
1978/2002 | -- | 146,193 | 70,393 | 96.4 | % | Mervyn's | 210 | ||||||||
Total/Average Community / Specialty Centers | 4,504,702 | 3,336,409 | 97.2 | % | 464 | |||||||||||||
Total before major development and redevelopment properties and other assets | 69,425,228 | 32,349,954 | 93.4 | % | 468 | |||||||||||||
MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES: |
||||||||||||||||||
51.3 | % | Promenade at Casa Grande(14) Casa Grande, Arizona |
2007/-- | 2007 ongoing | 827,726 | 389,976 | (15) | Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Kohl's, Target | N/A | |||||||||
84.7 | % | SanTan Village Regional Center(16) Gilbert, Arizona |
2007/-- | 2007 ongoing | 788,510 | 588,510 | (15) | Dillard's | N/A | |||||||||
100 | % | Santa Monica Place(6)(17) Santa Monica, California |
1980/1999 | 1990 | 556,933 | 273,683 | (15) | Macy's, | N/A | |||||||||
100 | % | Shoppingtown Mall(6) Dewitt, New York |
1954/2005 | 2000 | 1,002,084 | 519,384 | (15) | J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | N/A | |||||||||
100 | % | The Oaks(6) Thousand Oaks, California |
1978/2002 | 1993 | 1,047,095 | 344,020 | (15) | J.C. Penney, Macy's (two), Nordstrom(18) | N/A | |||||||||
Total Major Development and Redevelopment Properties | 4,222,348 | 2,115,573 | ||||||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||
100 | % | Mervyn's(19) | Various/2007 | 2,198,221 | -- | -- | -- | N/A | ||||||||||
100 | % | Paradise Village Investment Co. ground leases | Various/2002 | 165,968 | 165,968 | 80.9 | % | -- | N/A | |||||||||
30 | % | Wilshire Building | 1978/2007 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 100.0 | % | -- | N/A | |||||||||
Total Other Assets | 2,404,189 | 205,968 | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Total before Rochester Properties | 76,051,765 | 34,671,495 | ||||||||||||||||
ROCHESTER PROPERTIES(20): |
||||||||||||||||||
100 | % | Eastview Mall Victor, New York |
1971/2005 | 2003 | 1,686,690 | 789,608 | N/A | The Bon-Ton, Home Depot, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Target | N/A | |||||||||
100 | % | Greece Ridge Center Greece, New York |
1967/2005 | 1993 | 1,474,093 | 847,009 | N/A | Burlington Coat Factory, The Bon-Ton, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | N/A | |||||||||
37.5 | % | Marketplace Mall, The(5) Henrietta, New York |
1982/2005 | 1993 | 1,019,092 | 504,500 | N/A | The Bon-Ton, J.C. Penney, Macy's, Sears | N/A | |||||||||
63.6 | % | Pittsford Plaza Pittsford, New York |
1965/2005 | 1982 | 476,167 | 389,717 | N/A | | N/A | |||||||||
Total Rochester Properties | 4,656,042 | 2,530,834 | ||||||||||||||||
Grand Total at December 31, 2007 | 80,707,807 | 37,202,329 | ||||||||||||||||
25
January 2008 Acquisition | ||||||||||||||||||
50 | % | North Bridge, The Shops at(5)(12)(21) Chicago, Illinois |
1998/2008 | -- | 680,933 | 420,933 | 98.5 | % | Nordstrom | $ | 843 | |||||||
Post Rochester Redemption and Acquisition of The Shops at North Bridge | 76,732,698 | 35,092,428 | 93.5 | % | $ | 471 | (22) | |||||||||||
26
Mortgage Debt
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages encumbering the Centers, including those Centers in which the Company has less than a 100% interest. The information set forth below is as of December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
Property Pledged as Collateral |
Fixed or Floating |
Annual Interest Rate |
Carrying Amount(1) |
Annual Debt Service |
Maturity Date |
Balance Due on Maturity |
Earliest Date Notes Can Be Defeased or Be Prepaid |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consolidated Centers: | |||||||||||||||||
Capitola Mall(2) | Fixed | 7.13 | % | $ | 39,310 | $ | 4,558 | 5/15/11 | $ | 32,724 | Any Time | ||||||
Carmel Plaza | Fixed | 8.18 | % | 26,253 | 2,421 | 5/1/09 | 25,642 | Any Time | |||||||||
Chandler Fashion Center | Fixed | 5.52 | % | 169,789 | 12,514 | 11/1/12 | 152,097 | Any Time | |||||||||
Chesterfield Towne Center(3) | Fixed | 9.07 | % | 55,702 | 6,580 | 1/1/24 | 1,087 | Any Time | |||||||||
Danbury Fair Mall | Fixed | 4.64 | % | 176,457 | 14,698 | 2/1/11 | 155,173 | Any Time | |||||||||
Deptford Mall(4) | Fixed | 5.41 | % | 172,500 | 9,382 | 1/15/13 | 172,500 | 8/1/09 | |||||||||
Eastview Commons(5) | Fixed | 5.46 | % | 8,814 | 792 | 9/30/10 | 7,942 | Any Time | |||||||||
Eastview Mall(5) | Fixed | 5.10 | % | 101,007 | 7,107 | 1/18/14 | 87,927 | Any Time | |||||||||
Fiesta Mall | Fixed | 4.98 | % | 84,000 | 4,152 | 1/1/15 | 84,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Flagstaff Mall | Fixed | 5.03 | % | 37,000 | 1,863 | 11/1/15 | 37,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
FlatIron Crossing | Fixed | 5.26 | % | 187,736 | 13,223 | 12/1/13 | 164,187 | Any Time | |||||||||
Freehold Raceway Mall | Fixed | 4.68 | % | 177,686 | 14,208 | 7/7/11 | 155,678 | Any Time | |||||||||
Fresno Fashion Fair | Fixed | 6.52 | % | 63,590 | 5,244 | 8/10/08 | 62,974 | Any Time | |||||||||
Great Northern Mall | Fixed | 5.19 | % | 40,285 | 2,685 | 12/1/13 | 35,566 | Any Time | |||||||||
Greece Ridge Center(5)(6) | Floating | 5.97 | % | 72,000 | 4,298 | 11/6/08 | 72,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Hilton Village(7) | Fixed | 5.27 | % | 8,530 | 448 | 2/1/12 | 8,600 | 5/8/09 | |||||||||
La Cumbre Plaza(8) | Floating | 6.48 | % | 30,000 | 1,944 | 8/9/08 | 30,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Marketplace Mall(5) | Fixed | 5.30 | % | 39,345 | 3,204 | 12/10/17 | 24,353 | Any Time | |||||||||
Northridge Mall | Fixed | 4.94 | % | 81,121 | 5,438 | 7/1/09 | 70,991 | Any Time | |||||||||
Pacific View | Fixed | 7.23 | % | 88,857 | 7,780 | 8/31/11 | 83,045 | Any Time | |||||||||
Panorama Mall(9) | Floating | 6.00 | % | 50,000 | 2,999 | 2/28/10 | 50,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Paradise Valley Mall | Fixed | 5.89 | % | 21,231 | 2,193 | 5/1/09 | 19,863 | Any Time | |||||||||
Pittsford Plaza(5) | Fixed | 5.02 | % | 24,596 | 1,914 | 1/1/13 | 20,673 | Any Time | |||||||||
Pittsford Plaza(5)(10) | Fixed | 6.52 | % | 9,148 | 596 | 1/1/13 | 9,148 | Any Time | |||||||||
Prescott Gateway | Fixed | 5.86 | % | 60,000 | 3,468 | 12/1/11 | 60,000 | 12/21/08 | |||||||||
Promenade at Casa Grande(11) | Floating | 6.35 | % | 79,964 | 5,078 | 8/16/09 | 79,964 | Any Time | |||||||||
Queens Center | Fixed | 7.10 | % | 90,519 | 7,595 | 3/1/09 | 88,651 | Any Time | |||||||||
Queens Center(12) | Fixed | 7.00 | % | 217,077 | 18,013 | 3/31/13 | 204,203 | 2/19/08 | |||||||||
Rimrock Mall | Fixed | 7.56 | % | 42,828 | 3,841 | 10/1/11 | 40,025 | Any Time | |||||||||
Salisbury, Center at | Fixed | 5.83 | % | 115,000 | 6,659 | 5/1/16 | 115,000 | 6/29/08 | |||||||||
Santa Monica Place | Fixed | 7.79 | % | 79,014 | 7,272 | 11/1/10 | 75,544 | Any Time | |||||||||
Shoppingtown Mall | Fixed | 5.01 | % | 44,645 | 3,828 | 5/11/11 | 38,968 | Any Time | |||||||||
South Plains Mall | Fixed | 8.29 | % | 58,732 | 5,448 | 3/1/09 | 57,557 | Any Time | |||||||||
South Towne Center | Fixed | 6.66 | % | 64,000 | 4,289 | 10/10/08 | 64,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Towne Mall | Fixed | 4.99 | % | 14,838 | 1,206 | 11/1/12 | 12,316 | Any Time | |||||||||
Tucson La Encantada(2)(13) | Fixed | 5.84 | % | 78,000 | 4,555 | 6/1/12 | 78,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Twenty Ninth Street(14) | Floating | 5.93 | % | 110,558 | 6,556 | 6/5/09 | 110,558 | Any Time | |||||||||
Valley River Center(15) | Fixed | 5.60 | % | 120,000 | 6,720 | 2/1/16 | 120,000 | 2/1/09 | |||||||||
Valley View Center | Fixed | 5.81 | % | 125,000 | 7,247 | 1/1/11 | 125,000 | 3/14/08 | |||||||||
Victor Valley, Mall of | Fixed | 4.60 | % | 51,211 | 3,645 | 3/1/08 | 50,850 | Any Time | |||||||||
Village Fair North | Fixed | 5.89 | % | 10,880 | 983 | 7/15/08 | 10,710 | Any Time | |||||||||
Vintage Faire Mall | Fixed | 7.91 | % | 64,386 | 6,099 | 9/1/10 | 61,372 | Any Time | |||||||||
Westside Pavilion | Fixed | 6.74 | % | 92,037 | 7,538 | 7/1/08 | 91,133 | Any Time | |||||||||
Wilton Mall | Fixed | 4.79 | % | 44,624 | 4,183 | 11/1/09 | 40,838 | Any Time | |||||||||
$ | 3,328,270 | ||||||||||||||||
27
Joint Venture Centers (at Company's Pro Rata Share): |
|||||||||||||||||
Arrowhead Towne Center (33.3%) | Fixed | 6.38 | % | $ | 26,567 | $ | 2,240 | 10/1/11 | $ | 24,256 | Any Time | ||||||
Biltmore Fashion Park (50%) | Fixed | 4.70 | % | 38,201 | 2,433 | 7/10/09 | 34,972 | Any Time | |||||||||
Boulevard Shops (50%)(16) | Floating | 5.93 | % | 10,700 | 635 | 12/17/10 | 10,700 | Any Time | |||||||||
Broadway Plaza (50%)(2) | Fixed | 6.68 | % | 29,963 | 3,089 | 8/1/08 | 29,315 | Any Time | |||||||||
Camelback Colonnade (75%)(17) | Floating | 5.79 | % | 31,125 | 1,802 | 10/9/08 | 31,125 | Any Time | |||||||||
Cascade (51%) | Fixed | 5.27 | % | 20,110 | 1,362 | 7/1/10 | 19,221 | Any Time | |||||||||
Chandler Festival (50%) | Fixed | 4.37 | % | 14,865 | 958 | 10/1/08 | 14,583 | Any Time | |||||||||
Chandler Gateway (50%) | Fixed | 5.19 | % | 9,389 | 658 | 10/1/08 | 9,223 | Any Time | |||||||||
Chandler Village Center (50%)(18) | Floating | 6.14 | % | 8,643 | 531 | 1/15/11 | 8,643 | Any Time | |||||||||
Corte Madera, The Village at (50.1%) | Fixed | 7.75 | % | 32,653 | 3,095 | 11/1/09 | 31,534 | Any Time | |||||||||
Desert Sky Mall (50%)(19) | Floating | 6.13 | % | 25,750 | 1,578 | 3/6/08 | 25,750 | 10/26/08 | |||||||||
Eastland Mall (50%) | Fixed | 5.80 | % | 84,000 | 4,836 | 6/1/16 | 84,000 | 6/22/08 | |||||||||
Empire Mall (50%) | Fixed | 5.81 | % | 88,150 | 5,104 | 6/1/16 | 88,150 | 11/29/08 | |||||||||
Granite Run (50%) | Fixed | 5.84 | % | 59,906 | 4,311 | 6/1/16 | 51,504 | 6/7/08 | |||||||||
Inland Center (50%) | Fixed | 4.69 | % | 27,000 | 1,270 | 2/11/09 | 27,000 | Any Time | |||||||||
Kierland Greenway (24.5%) | Fixed | 6.01 | % | 15,846 | 1,144 | 1/1/13 | 13,679 | Any Time | |||||||||
Kierland Main Street (24.5%) | Fixed | 4.99 | % | 3,808 | 251 | 1/2/13 | 3,502 | Any Time | |||||||||
Kierland Tower Lofts (15%)(20) | Floating | 6.63 | % | 6,659 | 441 | 12/14/08 | 6,659 | Any Time | |||||||||
Kitsap Mall/Place (51%) | Fixed | 8.14 | % | 29,209 | 2,755 | 6/1/10 | 28,143 | Any Time | |||||||||
Lakewood Mall (51%) | Fixed | 5.43 | % | 127,500 | 6,995 | 6/1/15 | 127,500 | Any Time | |||||||||
Los Cerritos Center (51%)(21) | Floating | 5.92 | % | 66,300 | 3,926 | 7/1/11 | 66,300 | Any Time | |||||||||
Mesa Mall (50%) | Fixed | 5.82 | % | 43,625 | 2,526 | 6/1/16 | 43,625 | 8/29/08 | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall (15%)(22) | Fixed | 5.34 | % | 16,800 | 806 | 2/9/09 | 16,800 | Any Time | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall (15%)(23) | Floating | 8.54 | % | 3,240 | 277 | 2/9/09 | 3,240 | Any Time | |||||||||
NorthPark Center (50%)(24) | Fixed | 5.95 | % | 93,504 | 7,133 | 5/10/12 | 82,181 | Any Time | |||||||||
NorthPark Center (50%)(24) | Fixed | 8.33 | % | 41,656 | 3,996 | 5/10/12 | 38,919 | Any Time | |||||||||
NorthPark Land (50%) | Fixed | 8.33 | % | 40,236 | 3,858 | 5/10/12 | 33,633 | Any Time | |||||||||
NorthPark Land (50%)(25) | Floating | 8.25 | % | 3,500 | 289 | 8/30/08 | 3,500 | Any Time | |||||||||
Redmond Office (51%)(2) | Fixed | 6.77 | % | 33,690 | 4,443 | 7/10/09 | 30,285 | Any Time | |||||||||
Redmond Retail (51%) | Fixed | 4.81 | % | 36,789 | 2,025 | 8/1/09 | 27,164 | Any Time | |||||||||
Ridgmar (50%) | Fixed | 6.11 | % | 28,700 | 1,800 | 4/11/10 | 28,700 | Any Time | |||||||||
Rushmore (50%) | Fixed | 5.82 | % | 47,000 | 2,721 | 6/1/16 | 47,000 | 8/2/08 | |||||||||
SanTan Village Power Center (34.9%) | Fixed | 5.33 | % | 15,705 | 837 | 2/1/12 | 15,705 | Any Time | |||||||||
Scottsdale Fashion Square (50%)(26) | Fixed | 5.66 | % | 275,000 | 15,563 | 7/8/13 | 275,000 | 10/30/09 | |||||||||
Southern Hills (50%) | Fixed | 5.82 | % | 50,750 | 2,938 | 6/1/16 | 50,750 | 8/2/08 | |||||||||
Stonewood Mall (51%) | Fixed | 7.44 | % | 37,735 | 3,298 | 12/11/10 | 36,244 | Any Time | |||||||||
Superstition Springs Center (33.3%)(27) | Floating | 5.37 | % | 22,498 | 1,208 | 9/9/08 | 22,498 | 3/9/08 | |||||||||
Tysons Corner Center (50%) | Fixed | 4.78 | % | 168,955 | 11,232 | 2/17/14 | 147,595 | Any Time | |||||||||
Valley Mall (50%) | Fixed | 5.85 | % | 23,302 | 1,678 | 6/1/16 | 20,046 | 6/22/08 | |||||||||
Washington Square (51%) | Fixed | 6.72 | % | 49,932 | 5,051 | 2/1/09 | 48,021 | Any Time | |||||||||
Washington Square (51%)(28) | Floating | 7.23 | % | 16,547 | 1,196 | 2/1/09 | 16,547 | Any Time | |||||||||
West Acres (19%) | Fixed | 6.41 | % | 13,039 | 850 | 10/1/16 | 5,684 | Any Time | |||||||||
Wilshire Blvd. (30%)(29) | Fixed | 6.35 | % | 1,864 | 118 | 1/1/33 | 42 | 1/1/08 | |||||||||
$ | 1,820,411 | ||||||||||||||||
28
rate in the above tables represents the effective interest rate, including the debt premiums (discounts) and loan finance costs.
The debt premiums (discounts) as of December 31, 2007 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Consolidated Centers
Property Pledged as Collateral |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Danbury Fair Mall | $ | 13,405 | ||
Eastview Commons | 573 | |||
Eastview Mall | 1,736 | |||
Freehold Raceway Mall | 12,373 | |||
Great Northern Mall | (164 | ) | ||
Hilton Village | (70 | ) | ||
Marketplace Mall | 1,650 | |||
Paradise Valley Mall | 392 | |||
Pittsford Plaza | 857 | |||
Shoppingtown Mall | 3,731 | |||
Towne Mall | 464 | |||
Victor Valley, Mall of | 54 | |||
Village Fair North | 49 | |||
Wilton Mall | 2,729 | |||
$ | 37,779 | |||
Joint Venture Centers (at Company's Pro Rata Share)
Property Pledged as Collateral |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Arrowhead Towne Center | $ | 413 | ||
Biltmore Fashion Park | 1,559 | |||
Kierland Greenway | 732 | |||
Tysons Corner Center | 3,468 | |||
Wilshire Blvd. | (131 | ) | ||
$ | 6,041 | |||
29
interest rate cap agreement over the loan term which effectively prevents LIBOR from exceeding 7.12%. At December 31, 2007, the total interest rate was 6.48%.
30
which effectively prevent LIBOR from exceeding 5.25% on $11,500 of the loan and 7.25% on the remaining $25,880 of the loan. In connection with the loan extension, the joint venture entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $133.6 million to convert both loans at this property from floating rate debt to fixed rate debt of 4.57%, which effectively limits the weighted average interest rate on these loans to 5.92% from February 15, 2008 through February 15, 2009. At December 31, 2007, the total interest rate was 8.54%.
None of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Management Companies or their respective affiliates are currently involved in any material litigation nor, to the Company's knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against such entities or the Centers, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, most of which is expected to be covered by liability insurance. For information about certain environmental matters, see "Business--Environmental Matters."
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
31
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The common stock of the Company is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "MAC". The common stock began trading on March 10, 1994 at a price of $19 per share. In 2007, the Company's shares traded at a high of $103.59 and a low of $69.44.
As of February 8, 2008, there were approximately 961 stockholders of record. The following table shows high and low closing prices per share of common stock during each quarter in 2007 and 2006 and dividends/distributions per share of common stock declared and paid by quarter:
|
Market Quotation Per Share |
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dividends/ Distributions Declared/Paid |
||||||||
Quarter Ended |
High |
Low |
|||||||
March 31, 2007 | $ | 103.32 | $ | 85.76 | $ | 0.71 | |||
June 30, 2007 | 97.69 | 81.17 | 0.71 | ||||||
September 30, 2007 | 87.58 | 73.14 | 0.71 | ||||||
December 31, 2007 | 92.66 | 70.63 | 0.80 | ||||||
March 31, 2006 |
$ |
75.13 |
$ |
68.89 |
$ |
0.68 |
|||
June 30, 2006 | 74.05 | 67.90 | 0.68 | ||||||
September 30, 2006 | 77.11 | 70.02 | 0.68 | ||||||
December 31, 2006 | 87.00 | 76.16 | 0.71 |
At December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding 3,067,131 shares of its Series A cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock ("Series A Preferred Stock"). There is no established public trading market for the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock was issued on February 25, 1998. Preferred stock dividends are accrued quarterly and paid in arrears. The Series A Preferred Stock can be converted on a one for one basis into common stock and pays a quarterly dividend equal to the greater of $0.46 per share, or the dividend then payable on a share of common stock. No dividends will be declared or paid on any class of common or other junior stock to the extent that dividends on Series A Preferred Stock have not been declared and/or paid. The following table shows the dividends per share of Series A Preferred Stock declared and paid by quarter in 2007 and 2006:
|
Series A Preferred Stock Dividend |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarter Ended |
Declared |
Paid |
||||
March 31, 2007 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.71 | ||
June 30, 2007 | 0.71 | 0.71 | ||||
September 30, 2007 | 0.80 | 0.71 | ||||
December 31, 2007 | 0.80 | 0.80 | ||||
March 31, 2006 |
$ |
0.68 |
$ |
0.68 |
||
June 30, 2006 | 0.68 | 0.68 | ||||
September 30, 2006 | 0.71 | 0.68 | ||||
December 31, 2006 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
The Company's existing financing agreements limit, and any other financing agreements that the Company enters into in the future will likely limit, the Company's ability to pay cash dividends. Specifically, the Company may pay cash dividends and make other distributions based on a formula derived from Funds from Operations (See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Funds From Operations") and only if no event of default under the financing agreements has occurred, unless, under certain circumstances, payment of the distribution is necessary to enable the Company to qualify as a REIT under the Code.
32
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph provides a comparison, from December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2007, of the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of the Company, the Standard & Poor's ("S&P") 500 Index, the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the NAREIT All Equity REIT Index (the "NAREIT Index"), an industry index of publicly-traded REITs (including the Company). The Company is providing the S&P Midcap 400 Index since it is a company within such index.
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in each of the Company's common stock and the indices was $100 at the beginning of the period. The graph further assumes the reinvestment of dividends.
Upon written request directed to the Secretary of the Company, the Company will provide any stockholder with a list of the REITs included in the NAREIT Index. The historical information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Data for the NAREIT Index, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Midcap 400 Index were provided to the Company by Research Data Group, Inc.
Copyright © 2008, Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm
|
12/31/02 |
12/31/03 |
12/31/04 |
12/31/05 |
12/31/06 |
12/31/07 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Macerich Company | $ | 100.00 | $ | 154.38 | $ | 229.09 | $ | 255.36 | $ | 341.95 | $ | 290.34 | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100.00 | 128.68 | 142.69 | 149.70 | 173.34 | 182.87 | ||||||||||||
S&P Midcap 400 Index | 100.00 | 135.62 | 157.97 | 177.81 | 196.16 | 211.81 | ||||||||||||
NAREIT Equity Index | 100.00 | 137.13 | 180.44 | 202.38 | 273.34 | 230.45 |
33
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following sets forth selected financial data for the Company on a historical basis. The following data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements (and the notes thereto) of the Company and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" each included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. All amounts are in thousands except per share data.
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
OPERATING DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Minimum rents(1) | $ | 521,122 | $ | 489,078 | $ | 423,759 | $ | 294,846 | $ | 256,974 | ||||||||
Percentage rents | 26,816 | 24,667 | 24,152 | 15,655 | 10,646 | |||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 273,913 | 254,526 | 214,832 | 145,055 | 139,380 | |||||||||||||
Management Companies(2) | 39,752 | 31,456 | 26,128 | 21,549 | 14,630 | |||||||||||||
Other | 34,765 | 29,929 | 22,953 | 18,070 | 16,487 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 896,368 | 829,656 | 711,824 | 495,175 | 438,117 | |||||||||||||
Shopping center and operating expenses | 284,687 | 262,127 | 223,905 | 146,465 | 136,881 | |||||||||||||
Management Companies' operating expenses(2) | 73,761 | 56,673 | 52,840 | 44,080 | 32,031 | |||||||||||||
REIT general and administrative expenses | 16,600 | 13,532 | 12,106 | 11,077 | 8,482 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 236,241 | 224,273 | 193,145 | 128,413 | 95,888 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | 263,726 | 274,667 | 237,097 | 134,549 | 121,105 | |||||||||||||
Total expenses | 875,015 | 831,272 | 719,093 | 464,584 | 394,387 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated joint ventures | (3,730 | ) | (3,667 | ) | (700 | ) | (184 | ) | (112 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures and management companies(2) | 81,458 | 86,053 | 76,303 | 54,881 | 59,348 | |||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision)(3) | 470 | (33 | ) | 2,031 | 5,466 | 444 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | 12,146 | 38 | 1,253 | 473 | 11,960 | |||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (877 | ) | (1,835 | ) | (1,666 | ) | (1,642 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 110,820 | 78,940 | 69,952 | 89,585 | 115,326 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations:(4) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of assets | (2,409 | ) | 204,863 | 277 | 7,568 | 22,491 | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | 804 | 11,376 | 13,907 | 14,350 | 19,124 | |||||||||||||
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations | (1,605 | ) | 216,239 | 14,184 | 21,918 | 41,615 | ||||||||||||
Income before minority interest and preferred dividends | 109,215 | 295,179 | 84,136 | 111,503 | 156,941 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest in Operating Partnership(5) | (12,675 | ) | (42,821 | ) | (12,450 | ) | (19,870 | ) | (28,907 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 96,540 | 252,358 | 71,686 | 91,633 | 128,034 | |||||||||||||
Less preferred dividends | 24,879 | 24,336 | 19,098 | 9,140 | 14,816 | |||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 71,661 | $ | 228,022 | $ | 52,588 | $ | 82,493 | $ | 113,218 | ||||||||
Earnings per share ("EPS")--basic: | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.49 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 2.57 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share--basic | $ | 1.00 | $ | 3.22 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 2.11 | ||||||||
EPS--diluted:(6)(7) | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 2.46 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.55 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share--diluted | $ | 1.00 | $ | 3.19 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 1.40 | $ | 2.09 | ||||||||
34
|
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in real estate (before accumulated depreciation) | $ | 7,221,851 | $ | 6,499,205 | $ | 6,160,595 | $ | 4,149,776 | $ | 3,662,359 | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 8,121,134 | $ | 7,562,163 | $ | 7,178,944 | $ | 4,637,096 | $ | 4,145,593 | |||||||
Total mortgage and notes payable | $ | 5,762,958 | $ | 4,993,879 | $ | 5,424,730 | $ | 3,230,120 | $ | 2,682,598 | |||||||
Minority interest(5) | $ | 338,700 | $ | 387,183 | $ | 284,809 | $ | 221,315 | $ | 237,615 | |||||||
Class A participating convertible preferred units(8) | $ | 213,786 | $ | 213,786 | $ | 213,786 | $ | -- | $ | -- | |||||||
Class A non-participating convertible preferred units | $ | 16,459 | $ | 21,501 | $ | 21,501 | $ | -- | $ | -- | |||||||
Series A Preferred Stock(9) | $ | 83,495 | $ | 98,934 | $ | 98,934 | $ | 98,934 | $ | 98,934 | |||||||
Common stockholders' equity | $ | 1,312,634 | $ | 1,542,305 | $ | 827,108 | $ | 913,533 | $ | 953,485 | |||||||
OTHER DATA: |
|||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations ("FFO")--diluted(10) | $ | 407,927 | $ | 383,122 | $ | 336,831 | $ | 299,172 | $ | 269,132 | |||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in): | |||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 326,070 | $ | 211,850 | $ | 235,296 | $ | 213,197 | $ | 215,752 | |||||||
Investing activities | $ | (865,283 | ) | $ | (126,736 | ) | $ | (131,948 | ) | $ | (489,822 | ) | $ | (341,341 | ) | ||
Financing activities | $ | 355,051 | $ | 29,208 | $ | (20,349 | ) | $ | 308,383 | $ | 115,703 | ||||||
Number of centers at year end | 94 | 91 | 97 | 84 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding--EPS basic | 71,768 | 70,826 | 59,279 | 58,537 | 53,669 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding--EPS diluted(6)(7) | 84,760 | 88,058 | 73,573 | 73,099 | 75,198 | ||||||||||||
Cash distribution declared per common share | $ | 2.93 | $ | 2.75 | $ | 2.63 | $ | 2.48 | $ | 2.32 |
The Company sold its 67% interest in Paradise Village Gateway on January 2, 2003, and a loss on sale of $0.2 million has been classified as discontinued operations in 2003.
The Company sold Bristol Center on August 4, 2003, and the results for the period January 1, 2003 to August 4, 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of Bristol Center resulted in a gain on sale of asset of $22.2 million in 2003.
The Company sold Westbar on December 16, 2004, and the results for the period January 1, 2004 to December 16, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of Westbar resulted in a gain on sale of asset of $6.8 million.
On January 5, 2005, the Company sold Arizona Lifestyle Galleries. The sale of this property resulted in a gain on sale of $0.3 million and the impact on the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been reclassified to discontinued operations. Prior to 2004, this property was accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
On June 9, 2006, the Company sold Scottsdale/101 and the results for the period January 1, 2006 to June 9, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations.
35
Prior to January 1, 2004, this property was accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The sale of Scottsdale/101 resulted in a gain on sale of asset, at the Company's pro rata share, of $25.8 million.
The Company sold Park Lane Mall on July 13, 2006 and the results for the period January 1, 2006 to July 13, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of Park Lane Mall resulted in a gain on sale of asset of $5.9 million.
The Company sold Greeley Mall and Holiday Village Mall in a combined sale on July 27, 2006, and the results for the period January 1, 2006 to July 27, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of these properties resulted in a gain on sale of assets of $28.7 million.
The Company sold Great Falls Marketplace on August 11, 2006, and the results for the period January 1, 2006 to August 11, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of Great Falls Marketplace resulted in a gain on sale of $11.8 million.
The Company sold Citadel Mall, Crossroads Mall and Northwest Arkansas Mall in a combined sale on December 29, 2006, and the results for the period January 1, 2006 to December 29, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been classified as discontinued operations. The sale of these properties resulted in a gain on sale of assets of $132.7 million.
On December 17, 2007, the Company designated 27 freestanding stores acquired from Mervyn's in 2007 as available for sale. The results from December 17, 2007 to December 31, 2007 have been classified as discontinued operations.
In addition, the Company recorded an additional loss of $2.4 million in 2007, related to the sale of properties in 2006.
Total revenues and income from discontinued operations were:
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Bristol Center | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 2.5 | ||||||
Westbar | -- | -- | -- | 4.8 | 5.7 | |||||||||||
Arizona LifeStyle Galleries | -- | -- | -- | 0.3 | -- | |||||||||||
Scottsdale/101 | 0.1 | 4.7 | 9.8 | 6.9 | -- | |||||||||||
Park Lane Mall | -- | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | |||||||||||
Holiday Village | 0.2 | 2.9 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 5.3 | |||||||||||
Greeley Mall | -- | 4.3 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 5.9 | |||||||||||
Great Falls Marketplace | -- | 1.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.5 | |||||||||||
Citadel Mall | -- | 15.7 | 15.3 | 15.4 | 16.1 | |||||||||||
Northwest Arkansas Mall | -- | 12.9 | 12.6 | 12.7 | 12.5 | |||||||||||
Crossroads Mall | -- | 11.5 | 10.9 | 11.2 | 12.2 | |||||||||||
Mervyn's Stores | 1.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1.5 | $ | 55.3 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 67.9 | $ | 65.8 | ||||||
Income from operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Bristol Center | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 1.4 | ||||||
Westbar | -- | -- | -- | 1.8 | 1.7 | |||||||||||
Arizona LifeStyle Galleries | -- | -- | -- | (1.0 | ) | -- | ||||||||||
Scottsdale/101 | -- | 0.3 | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Park Lane Mall | -- | -- | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |||||||||||
Holiday Village | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 2.4 | |||||||||||
Greeley Mall | (0.1 | ) | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Great Falls Marketplace | -- | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | |||||||||||
Citadel Mall | (0.1 | ) | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | ||||||||||
Northwest Arkansas Mall | -- | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 | |||||||||||
Crossroads Mall | -- | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.7 | |||||||||||
Mervyn's Stores | 0.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 0.8 | $ | 11.4 | $ | 13.9 | $ | 14.4 | $ | 19.1 | ||||||
36
The computation of FFO-diluted includes the effect of share and unit-based compensation plans and convertible senior notes calculated using the treasury stock method. It also assumes the conversion of MACWH, LP common and preferred units and all other securities to the extent that they are dilutive to the FFO computation (See Note 12--Acquisitions of the Company's Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). On February 25, 1998, the Company sold $100 million of its Series A Preferred Stock. On June 16, 1998, the Company sold $150 million of its Series B Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock can be converted on a one-for-one basis for common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding was dilutive to FFO in 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and was dilutive to net income in 2006 and 2003. All of the Series B Preferred Stock was converted to common stock on September 9, 2003. The Series B Preferred Stock then outstanding was dilutive to FFO and net income in 2003.
37
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management's Overview and Summary
The Company is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community shopping centers located throughout the United States. The Company is the sole general partner of, and owns a majority of the ownership interests in, the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2007, the Operating Partnership owned or had an ownership interest in 74 regional shopping centers and 20 community shopping centers aggregating approximately 80.7 million square feet of GLA. These 94 regional and community shopping centers are referred to hereinafter as the "Centers", unless the context otherwise requires. The Company is a self-administered and self-managed REIT and conducts all of its operations through the Operating Partnership and the Company's Management Companies.
The following discussion is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. It compares the results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007 to the results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. Also included is a comparison of the results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 to the results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005. This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Acquisitions and Dispositions:
The financial statements reflect the following acquisitions, dispositions and changes in ownership subsequent to the occurrence of each transaction.
On January 5, 2005, the Company sold Arizona Lifestyle Galleries for $4.3 million. The sale resulted in a gain on sale on asset of $0.3 million.
On January 11, 2005, the Company became a 15% owner in a joint venture that acquired Metrocenter Mall, a 1.1 million square foot super-regional mall in Phoenix, Arizona. The total purchase price was $160 million and concurrently with the acquisition, the joint venture placed a $112 million loan on the property. The Company's share of the purchase price, net of the debt, was $7.2 million which was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
On January 21, 2005, the Company formed a 50/50 joint venture with a private investment company. The joint venture acquired a 49% interest in Kierland Commons, a 435,022 square foot mixed-use center in Phoenix, Arizona. The joint venture's purchase price for the interest in the Center was $49.0 million. The Company assumed its share of the underlying property debt and funded the remainder of its share of the purchase price by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
On April 8, 2005, the Company acquired Ridgmar Mall, a 1.3 million square foot super-regional mall in Fort Worth, Texas. The acquisition was completed in a 50/50 joint venture with an affiliate of Walton Street Capital, LLC. The purchase price was $71.1 million. Concurrent with the closing, a $57.4 million loan bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.0725% was placed on the property. The balance of the purchase price was funded by borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
On April 25, 2005, the Company and the Operating Partnership acquired Wilmorite Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Wilmorite"), and Wilmorite Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Wilmorite Holdings"). Wilmorite's portfolio included interests in 11 regional malls and two open-air community shopping centers with 13.4 million square feet of space located in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Kentucky and Virginia. The total purchase price was
38
approximately $2.3 billion, plus adjustments for working capital, including the assumption of approximately $877.2 million of existing debt with an average interest rate of 6.43% and the issuance of $212.7 million of PCPUs, $21.5 million of non-participating convertible preferred units and $5.8 million of common units in Wilmorite Holdings. The balance of the consideration to the equity holders of Wilmorite and Wilmorite Holdings was paid in cash, which was provided primarily by a five-year, $450 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% and a $650 million acquisition loan with a term of up to two years and bearing interest initially at LIBOR plus 1.60%. An affiliate of the Operating Partnership is the general partner and, together with other affiliates, owned as of December 31, 2007 approximately 83% of Wilmorite Holdings, with the remaining 17% held by those limited partners of Wilmorite Holdings who elected to receive convertible preferred units or common units in Wilmorite Holdings rather than cash. On January 1, 2008, the PCPUs were redeemed for the Rochester Properties.
The Wilmorite portfolio, exclusive of Tysons Corner Center and Tysons Corner Office (collectively referred herein as "Tysons Center"), are referred to herein as the "2005 Acquisition Centers."
On February 1, 2006, the Company acquired Valley River Center, an 910,841 square foot super-regional mall in Eugene, Oregon. The total purchase price was $187.5 million and concurrent with the acquisition, the Company placed a $100.0 million ten-year loan on the property. The balance of the purchase price was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
On June 9, 2006, the Company sold Scottsdale/101, a 564,000 square foot center in Phoenix, Arizona. The sale price was $117.6 million from which $56.0 million was used to payoff the mortgage on the property. The Company's share of the realized gain was $25.8 million.
On July 13, 2006, the Company sold Park Lane Mall, a 370,000 square foot center in Reno, Nevada, for $20 million resulting in a gain of $5.9 million.
On July 26, 2006, the Company purchased 11 department stores located in 10 of its Centers from Federated Department Stores, Inc. for approximately $100.0 million. The purchase price consisted of a $93.0 million cash payment at closing and a $7.0 million cash payment in 2007, in connection with development work by Federated at the Company's development properties. The Company's share of the purchase price was $81.0 million and was funded in part from the proceeds of sales of Park Lane Mall, Greeley Mall, Holiday Village and Great Falls Marketplace, and from borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The balance of the purchase price was paid by the Company's joint venture partners.
On July 27, 2006, the Company sold Holiday Village, a 498,000 square foot center in Great Falls, Montana, and Greeley Mall, a 564,000 square foot center in Greeley, Colorado, in a combined sale for $86.8 million, resulting in a gain of $28.7 million.
On August 11, 2006, the Company sold Great Falls Marketplace, a 215,000 square foot community center in Great Falls, Montana, for $27.5 million resulting in a gain of $11.8 million.
On December 1, 2006, the Company acquired Deptford Mall, a two-level 1.0 million square foot super-regional mall in Deptford, New Jersey. The total purchase price of $240.1 million was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. On December 7, 2006, the Company placed a $100.0 million six-year loan bearing interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% on the property.
On December 29, 2006, the Company sold Citadel Mall, a 1,095,000 square foot center in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Crossroads Mall, a 1,268,000 square foot center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and Northwest Arkansas Mall, a 820,000 square foot center in Fayetteville, Arkansas, in a combined sale for $373.8 million, resulting in a gain of $132.7 million. The net proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit and pay off the Company's $75.0 million loan on Paradise Valley Mall.
39
Valley River Center and Deptford Mall are referred to herein as the "2006 Acquisition Centers."
On September 5, 2007, the Company purchased the remaining 50% outside ownership interest in Hilton Village, a 96,546 square foot specialty center in Scottsdale, Arizona. The total purchase price of $13.5 million was funded by cash, borrowings under the Company's line of credit and the assumption of a mortgage note payable. The Center was previously accounted for under the equity method as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures.
On December 17, 2007, the Company purchased a portfolio of ground leasehold interest and/or fee interests in 39 freestanding Mervyn's stores located in the Southwest United States. The purchase price of $400.2 million was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. At acquisition, management designated the 27 freestanding stores located at shopping centers not owned or managed by the Company as available for sale.
Hilton Village and the 12 Mervyn's freestanding stores that have not been designated as available for sale are referred herein as the "2007 Acquisition Properties."
Redevelopments and Developments:
The first phase of SanTan Village Regional Center opened on October 26, 2007. The 1.2 million square foot open-air super-regional shopping center opened with over 90% of the retail space committed, with Dillard's and more than 85 specialty retailers joining Harkins Theatres, which opened March 2007. The balance of the project, which includes Dick's Sporting Goods, Best Buy, Barnes & Noble and up to 13 restaurants, is expected to open in phases throughout 2008.
The first phase of The Promenade at Casa Grande, a 1 million square foot, 130 acre department store anchored hybrid center, located in Casa Grande, Arizona, opened on November 16, 2007. With ninety percent committed, the first phase of the project has approximately 550,000 square feet of mini-majors, including Dillard's, Target, J.C.Penney, Kohl's, Petsmart and Staples. The balance of the Center is expected to continue to open in phases throughout 2008.
The first phase of The Marketplace at Flagstaff Mall, a 435,000 square foot lifestyle expansion began opening in phases on October 19, 2007. Phase I delivered approximately 267,538 square feet of new retail space including Best Buy, Home Depot, Linens n Things, Marshalls, Old Navy, Petco and Shoe Pavilion. Phase II, which will consist of village shops, an entertainment plaza and pad space, is expected to be completed in 2009-2010.
On November 8, 2007, Freehold Raceway Mall opened the first phase of a combined expansion and renovation project that will add 96,000 square feet of new retail and restaurant uses to this regional center in New Jersey. The expansion, which is 85% committed, added nine new-to-market additions including: Borders, The Cheesecake Factory, P.F. Chang's, Jared The Galleria of Jewelry, The Territory Ahead, Ann Taylor, Chico's, Coldwater Creek and White House/Black Market. The balance of the project is expected to open throughout 2008.
Scottsdale Fashion Square, the 2 million square foot luxury flagship, is undergoing a $130 million redevelopment and expansion. Phase I of the redevelopment and expansion began September 2007 with demolition of the vacant anchor space acquired as a result of the Federated-May merger and an adjacent parking structure. A 60,000 square foot Barneys New York, the high-end retailer's first Arizona location, will anchor an additional 100,000 square feet of up to 30 new luxury shops, which is planned to open in Fall 2009 in an urban setting on Scottsdale Road. New first-to-market deals include Salvatore Ferragamo, Grand Luxe Café, CH Carolina Herrera, and Michael Kors. First-to-market retailers opening in the Spring 2008 will include Bottega Veneta, Jimmy Choo and Marciano.
Construction continues on the combined redevelopment, expansion and interior renovation of The Oaks, an upscale 1.0 million square foot super-regional shopping center in California's affluent
40
Thousand Oaks. The market's first Nordstrom department store is under construction. Construction of a first-to-market, 138,000 square foot Nordstrom Department Store, two-level open-air retail, dining and entertainment venue and new multi-level parking structure at The Oaks continues on schedule toward a phased completion beginning Fall 2008.
In December 2007, the Company received full entitlements to proceed with plans for a redevelopment of Santa Monica Place. The regional center will be redeveloped as an open-air shopping and dining environment that will connect with the popular Third Street Promenade. The Santa Monica Place redevelopment has started and is moving forward with a projected Fall 2009 completion.
Inflation:
In the last three years, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company because of a relatively low inflation rate. Most of the leases at the Centers have rent adjustments periodically through the lease term. These rent increases are either in fixed increments or based on using an annual multiple of increases in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). In addition, about 6%-13% of the leases expire each year, which enables the Company to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rents if the rents of the existing leases are below the then existing market rate. Additionally, historically the majority of the leases required the tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses. In January 2005, the Company began entering into leases that require tenants to pay a stated amount for operating expenses, generally excluding property taxes, regardless of the expenses actually incurred at any Center. This change shifts the burden of cost control to the Company.
Seasonality:
The shopping center industry is seasonal in nature, particularly in the fourth quarter during the holiday season when retailer occupancy and retail sales are typically at their highest levels. In addition, shopping malls achieve a substantial portion of their specialty (temporary retailer) rents during the holiday season and the majority of percentage rent is recognized in the fourth quarter. As a result of the above, earnings are generally higher in the fourth quarter.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Some of these estimates and assumptions include judgments on revenue recognition, estimates for common area maintenance and real estate tax accruals, provisions for uncollectible accounts, impairment of long-lived assets, the allocation of purchase price between tangible and intangible assets, and estimates for environmental matters. The Company's significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the following policies are deemed to be critical.
Revenue Recognition
Minimum rental revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The difference between the amount of rent due in a year and the amount recorded as rental income is referred to as the "straight line rent adjustment." Currently, 53% of the mall and freestanding leases contain provisions for CPI rent increases periodically throughout the term of the lease. The Company believes that using an annual multiple of CPI increases, rather than fixed contractual rent increases, results in revenue recognition that more closely matches the cash revenue from each lease and will
41
provide more consistent rent growth throughout the term of the leases. Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants' specified sales targets have been met. Estimated recoveries from certain tenants for their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance and other shopping center operating expenses are recognized as revenues in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. Other tenants pay a fixed rate and these tenant recoveries' revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.
Property
The Company capitalizes costs incurred in redevelopment and development of properties in accordance with SFAS No. 34 "Capitalization of Interest Cost" and SFAS No. 67 "Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties." The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. Capitalized costs are allocated to the specific components of a project that are benefited. The Company considers a construction project as completed and held available for occupancy and ceases capitalization of costs when the areas under development have been substantially completed.
Maintenance and repairs expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Costs for major replacements and betterments, which includes HVAC equipment, roofs, parking lots, etc., are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Gains and losses are recognized upon disposal or retirement of the related assets and are reflected in earnings.
Property is recorded at cost and is depreciated using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements | 5-40 years | |
Tenant improvements | 5-7 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5-7 years |
Accounting for Acquisitions
The Company accounts for all acquisitions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations." The Company first determines the value of the land and buildings utilizing an "as if vacant" methodology. The Company then assigns a fair value to any debt assumed at acquisition. The balance of the purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets associated with the existing leases valued on a fair market value basis at the acquisition date prorated over the remaining lease terms. The tenant improvements are classified as an asset under real estate investments and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms: (i) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with "cost avoidance" of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms generally experienced in the Company's markets; (ii) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurred for the period required to lease the "assumed vacant" property to the occupancy level when purchased; and (iii) above or below market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. Leasing commissions and legal costs are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and are amortized over the remaining lease terms. The value of in-place leases are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and amortized over the remaining lease terms plus an estimate of renewal of the acquired leases. Above or below market leases are classified in deferred charges and other assets or
42
in other accrued liabilities, depending on whether the contractual terms are above or below market, and the asset or liability is amortized to minimum rents over the remaining terms of the leases.
When the Company acquires a real estate property, the Company allocates the purchase price to the components of these acquisitions using relative fair values computed using its estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of costs allocated between various components as well as the amount of costs assigned to individual properties in multiple property acquisitions. These allocations also impact depreciation expense and gains or loses recorded on future sales of properties.
Asset Impairment
The Company assesses whether there has been impairment in the value of its long-lived assets by considering factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Such factors include the tenant's ability to perform their duties and pay rent under the terms of the leases. The Company may recognize impairment losses if the cash flows are not sufficient to cover its investment. Such a loss would be determined as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of a center.
Deferred Charges
Costs relating to obtaining tenant leases are deferred and amortized over the initial term of the agreement using the straight-line method. Costs relating to financing of shopping center properties are deferred and amortized over the life of the related loan using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. In-place lease values are amortized over the remaining lease term plus an estimate of renewal. Leasing commissions and legal costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the individual remaining lease years. The ranges of the terms of the agreements are as follows:
Deferred lease costs | 1-15 years | |
Deferred financing costs | 1-15 years | |
In-place lease values | Remaining lease term plus an estimate for renewal | |
Leasing commissions and legal costs | 5-10 years |
Results of Operations
Many of the variations in the results of operations, discussed below, occurred due to the transactions described above including the 2007 Acquisition Properties, the 2006 Acquisition Centers, the 2005 Acquisition Centers and the Redevelopment Centers. For the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2007 to the year ended December 31, 2006, the "Same Centers" include all consolidated Centers, excluding the 2007 Acquisition Centers, the 2006 Acquisition Centers and the Redevelopment Centers. For the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 to the year ended December 31, 2005, the Same Centers include all consolidated Centers, excluding the 2006 Acquisition Centers, the 2005 Acquisition Centers and the Redevelopment Centers.
For the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2007 to the year ended December 31, 2006, "Redevelopment Centers" include The Oaks, Twenty Ninth Street, Santa Monica Place, Westside Pavilion, The Marketplace at Flagstaff Mall, SanTan Village Regional Center and Promenade at Casa Grande. For the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 to the year ended December 31, 2005, "Redevelopment Centers" include Twenty Ninth Street, Santa Monica Place and Westside Pavilion.
43
For comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 to the year ended December 31, 2005, Kierland Commons, Metrocenter Mall, Ridgmar Mall and Tysons Center are referred to herein as the "Joint Venture Acquisition Centers." Unconsolidated joint ventures are reflected using the equity method of accounting. The Company's pro rata share of the results from these Centers is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Minimum and percentage rents (collectively referred to as "rental revenue") increased by $34.2 million, or 6.7%, from 2006 to 2007. The increase in rental revenue is attributed to an increase of $17.9 million from the 2006 Acquisition Centers, $13.8 million from the Redevelopment Centers, $2.0 million from the Same Centers and $0.5 million from the 2007 Acquisition Properties.
The amortization of above and below market leases, which is recorded in rental revenue, decreased to $11.7 million in 2007 from $13.1 million in 2006. The decrease in amortization is primarily due to leases terminated in 2006. The amortization of straight-lined rents, included in rental revenue, was $10.2 million in 2007 compared to $7.8 million in 2006. Lease termination income, which is included in rental revenue, decreased to $9.9 million in 2007 from $18.0 million in 2006.
Tenant recoveries increased $19.4 million, or 7.7%, from 2006 to 2007. The increase in tenant recoveries is attributed to an increase of $11.0 million from the 2006 Acquisition Centers, $4.3 million from the Redevelopment Centers, $4.0 million from the Same Centers and $0.1 million from the 2007 Acquisition Properties.
Management Companies' Revenues
Management Companies' revenues increased by $8.3 million from 2006 to 2007, primarily due to increased management fees received from the joint venture Centers, additional third party management contracts and increased development fees from joint ventures.
Shopping Center and Operating Expenses
Shopping center and operating expenses increased $22.6 million, or 8.6%, from 2006 to 2007. Approximately $9.6 million of the increase in shopping center and operating expenses is from the 2006 Acquisition Centers, $6.8 million is from the Redevelopment Centers, $6.0 million is from the Same Centers and $0.2 million is from the 2007 Acquisition Properties.
Management Companies' Operating Expenses
Management Companies' operating expenses increased to $73.8 million in 2007 from $56.7 million in 2006, in part as a result of the additional costs of managing the joint venture Centers and third party managed properties, higher compensation expense due to increased staffing and higher professional fees.
REIT General and Administrative Expenses
REIT general and administrative expenses increased by $3.1 million in 2007 from 2006, primarily due to increased share and unit-based compensation expense in 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $12.0 million in 2007 from 2006. The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily attributed to an increase of $10.5 million at the Redevelopment Centers, $10.4 million at the 2006 Acquisition Centers and $0.2 million at the 2007 Acquisition Properties. This increase is offset in part by a decrease of $5.5 million at the Same Centers.
44
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $10.9 million in 2007 from 2006. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributed to a decrease of $17.2 million from term loans, $16.1 million from the line of credit, $8.4 million from the Same Centers and $2.7 million from the Redevelopment Centers. The decrease in interest expense was offset in part by an increase of $27.3 million from the $950.0 million convertible senior notes issued on March 16, 2007 and $6.6 million from the 2006 Acquisition Centers. The decrease in interest on term loans was due to the repayment of the $250 million loan in 2007 and the repayment of the $619 million term loan in 2006. The decrease in interest on the line of credit was due to: (i) a decrease in average outstanding borrowings during 2007, in part, because of the issuance of the senior notes, (ii) a decrease in interest rates because of the $400 million swap and (iii) lower LIBOR rates and spreads. The decrease in interest from the Same Centers is due to: (i) the repayment of the $75.0 million loan on Paradise Valley Mall in January 2007, (ii) an increase in capitalized interest and (iii) a decrease in LIBOR rates on floating rate mortgages payable. The above interest expense items are net of capitalized interest, which increased to $32.0 million in 2007 from $14.9 million in 2006 due to an increase in redevelopment activity in 2007.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $4.6 million in 2007 from 2006. The decrease in equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures is due in part to a $2.0 million loss on sale of assets at the SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. joint venture and additional interest expense and depreciation at other joint ventures due to the completion of development projects.
Gain on Sale of Assets
The Company recorded a gain on sale of assets of $12.1 million in 2007 relating to land sales of $8.8 million and $3.3 million relating to sale of equipment and furnishings.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
The Company recorded a $0.9 million loss from the early extinguishment of the $250 million term loan in 2007. In 2006, the Company recorded a loss from the early extinguishment of debt of $1.8 million related to the pay off of the $619 million term loan.
Discontinued Operations
The decrease of $217.8 million in income from discontinued operations is primarily related to the recognition of gain on the sales of Scottsdale/101, Park Lane Mall, Holiday Village, Greeley Mall, Great Falls Marketplace, Citadel Mall, Crossroads Mall and Northwest Arkansas Mall in 2006 (See "Management's Overview and Summary--Acquisitions and Dispositions"). As result of these sales, the Company classified the results of operations for these properties to discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Minority Interest in the Operating Partnership
The minority interest in the Operating Partnership represents the 15.0% weighted average interest of the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company during 2007 compared to the 15.8% not owned by the Company during 2006. The change in ownership interest is primarily due to the common stock offering by the Company in 2006, the conversion of partnership units and preferred shares into common shares in 2007 which is offset in part by the repurchase of 807,000 shares in 2007 (See Note 21--Stock Repurchase Program of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).
45
Funds From Operations
Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, funds from operations ("FFO")--diluted increased 6.5% to $407.9 million in 2007 from $383.1 million in 2006. For the reconciliation of FFO and FFO--diluted to net income available to common stockholders, see "Funds from Operations."
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations increased to $326.1 million in 2007 from $211.9 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to changes in assets and liabilities in 2007 compared to 2006 and due to the results at the Centers as discussed above.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities increased to $865.3 million in 2007 from $126.7 million in 2006. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to a $580.3 million decrease in cash proceeds from the sales of assets and a $220.9 million increase in capital expenditures.
Financing Activities
Cash flow provided by financing activities increased to $355.1 million in 2007 from $29.2 million in 2006. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributed to the issuance of $950 million convertible senior notes issuance in 2007, offset in part by a decrease of $746.8 million in proceeds from the common stock offering in 2006 (See "Liquidity and Capital Resources") and the purchase of the Capped Calls in connection with the issuance of the convertible senior notes in 2007.
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
Rental revenue increased by $65.8 million or 14.7% from 2005 to 2006. Approximately $43.5 million of the increase in rental revenue related to the 2005 Acquisition Centers, $11.9 million was related to the 2006 Acquisition Centers and $9.9 million was related to the Same Centers due in part to an increase in lease termination income of $7.2 million compared to 2005 at the Same Centers. The increases are offset in part by a decrease in rental revenue of $0.5 million at the Redevelopment Centers.
The amount of straight-lined rents, included in rental revenue, was $7.8 million in 2006 compared to $6.7 million in 2005. This increase is primarily due to the 2006 Acquisition Centers.
The amortization of above and below market leases, which is recorded in rental revenue, increased to $13.1 million in 2006 from $11.6 million in 2005. The increase in amortization is primarily due to the 2005 Acquisition Centers and 2006 Acquisition Centers.
Tenant recoveries increased $39.7 million or 18.5% from 2005 to 2006. Approximately $23.0 million of the increase in tenant recoveries related to the 2005 Acquisition Centers, $5.1 million related to the 2006 Acquisition Centers and $12.4 million related to the Same Centers due to an increase in recoverable shopping center expenses. The increase in tenant recoveries was offset in part by a decrease of $0.9 million at the Redevelopment Centers.
Management Companies' Revenues
Management Companies' revenues increased by $5.3 million from 2005 to 2006, primarily due to increased management fees received from the Joint Venture Acquisition Centers, third party management contracts and increased development fees from joint ventures.
46
Shopping Center and Operating Expenses
Shopping center and operating expenses increased $38.2 million or 17.1% from 2005 to 2006. Approximately $25.6 million of the increase in shopping center and operating expenses related to the 2005 Acquisition Centers, $5.0 million related to the 2006 Acquisition Centers and $8.0 million related to the Same Centers offset in part by a $0.5 million decrease at the Redevelopment Centers.
Management Companies' Operating Expenses
Management Companies' operating expenses increased to $56.7 million in 2006 from $52.8 million in 2005, primarily as a result of the additional costs of managing the Joint Venture Acquisition Centers and third party managed properties.
REIT General and Administrative Expenses
REIT general and administrative expenses increased by $1.4 million in 2006 from 2005, primarily due to increased share-based compensation expense in 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $31.1 million in 2006 from 2005. The increase is primarily attributed to the 2005 Acquisition Centers of $17.8 million, the 2006 Acquisition Centers of $6.2 million and the Same Centers of $7.4 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $37.6 million in 2006 from 2005. Approximately $13.8 million of the increase relates to the term loan associated with the 2005 Acquisition Centers, $12.4 million relates to assumed debt from the 2005 Acquisition Centers, $5.3 million relates to the 2006 Acquisition Centers, $13.3 million relates to increased borrowings and higher interest rates under the Company's line of credit, $6.7 million relates to higher interest rates on the $250 million term loan and approximately $8.9 million relates to increased interest expense due to refinancings and higher rates on floating rate debt regarding the Same Centers. These increases were offset in part by an approximately $1.3 million decrease in interest expense at the Redevelopment Centers and $21.6 million relating to the pay off of the acquisition loan associated with the 2005 Acquisition Centers. Additionally, capitalized interest was $14.9 million in 2006, up from $10.0 million in 2005.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $9.7 million in 2006 from 2005. Approximately $6.5 million of the increase relates to increased income from the Joint Venture Acquisition Centers, increased net income of $3.3 million from the Pacific Premier Retail Trust joint venture due to increased rental revenue and $4.6 million from other joint ventures due to increased rental revenues. This is partly offset by a $4.7 million increase in interest expense from the SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. joint venture.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
The Company recorded a loss from the early extinguishment of debt of $1.8 million in 2006 related to the pay off of the $619 million acquisition loan on January 19, 2006. In 2005, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.7 relating to the refinancing of the mortgage note payable on Valley View Mall.
47
Discontinued Operations
The increase of $202.1 million in discontinued operations relates to the gain on sales of Scottsdale/101, Park Lane Mall, Holiday Village, Greeley Mall, Great Falls Marketplace, Citadel Mall, Crossroads Mall and Northwest Arkansas Mall in 2006 (See "Management's Overview and Summary--Acquisitions and Dispositions"). As result of the sales, the Company reclassified the results of operations for these properties for 2006 and 2005.
Minority Interest in the Operating Partnership
The minority interest in the Operating Partnership represents the 15.8% weighted average interest of the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company during 2006 compared to the 19.0% not owned by the Company during 2005. The change is primarily due to the stock offering by the Company in January 2006.
Funds From Operations
Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, FFO--Diluted increased 13.7% to $383.1 million in 2006 from $336.8 million in 2005. For the reconciliation of FFO and FFO--diluted to net income available to common stockholders, see "Funds from Operations."
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations decreased to $211.9 million in 2006 from $235.3 million in 2005. The decrease is primarily due to changes in assets and liabilities in 2006 compared to 2005 and due to the results at the Centers as discussed above.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities decreased to $126.7 million in 2006 from $131.9 million in 2005. The decrease is primarily attributed to the cash used to acquire the 2006 Acquisition Centers and increases in development and redevelopment costs at the Centers. This is offset by $610.6 million in proceeds from the sale of assets in 2006 (See "Management's Overview and Summary--Acquisitions and Dispositions").
Financing Activities
Cash flow provided by financing activities was $29.2 million in 2006 compared to cash used in financing activities of $20.3 million in 2005. The increase is primarily attributed to the net proceeds of $746.8 million from the stock offering in January 2006 offset in part by a reduction of debt in 2006 compared to 2005.
48
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company intends to meet its short term liquidity requirements through cash generated from operations, working capital reserves, property secured borrowings, unsecured corporate borrowings and borrowings under the revolving line of credit. The Company anticipates that revenues will continue to provide necessary funds for its operating expenses and debt service requirements, and to pay dividends to stockholders in accordance with REIT requirements. The Company anticipates that cash generated from operations, together with cash on hand, will be adequate to fund capital expenditures which will not be reimbursed by tenants, other than non-recurring capital expenditures.
The following tables summarize capital expenditures incurred at the Centers for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Consolidated Centers: | |||||||||
Acquisitions of property and equipment | $ | 387,899 | $ | 580,542 | $ | 1,767,237 | |||
Development, redevelopment and expansion of Centers | 545,926 | 184,315 | 77,254 | ||||||
Renovations of Centers | 31,065 | 51,406 | 51,092 | ||||||
Tenant allowances | 27,959 | 26,976 | 21,765 | ||||||
Deferred leasing charges | 21,611 | 21,610 | 21,836 | ||||||
$ | 1,014,460 | $ | 864,849 | $ | 1,939,184 | ||||
Joint Venture Centers (at Company's pro rata share): | |||||||||
Acquisitions of property and equipment | $ | 24,828 | $ | 28,732 | $ | 736,451 | |||
Development, redevelopment and expansion of Centers | 33,492 | 48,785 | 79,400 | ||||||
Renovations of Centers | 10,495 | 8,119 | 32,243 | ||||||
Tenant allowances | 15,066 | 13,795 | 8,922 | ||||||
Deferred leasing charges | 4,181 | 4,269 | 5,113 | ||||||
$ | 88,062 | $ | 103,700 | $ | 862,129 | ||||
Management expects similar levels to be incurred in future years for tenant allowances and deferred leasing charges and to incur between $400 million to $600 million in 2008 for development, redevelopment, expansion and renovations. In January 2008, in a 50/50 joint venture, the Company acquired The Shops at North Bridge, a 680,933 square foot urban shopping center in Chicago, Illinois, for a total purchase price of $515.0 million. The Company's pro rata share of the purchase price was funded by the assumption of a pro rata share of the $205.0 million fixed rate mortgage on the Center and by borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
Capital for major expenditures, developments and/or redevelopments has been, and is expected to continue to be, obtained from equity or debt financings which include borrowings under the Company's line of credit and construction loans. However, many factors impact the Company's ability to access capital, such as its overall debt level, interest rates, interest coverage ratios and prevailing market conditions.
The Company's total outstanding loan indebtedness at December 31, 2007 was $7.6 billion (including $1.8 billion of its pro rata share of joint venture debt). This equated to a debt to Total Market Capitalization (defined as total debt of the Company, including its pro rata share of joint venture debt, plus aggregate market value of outstanding shares of common stock, assuming full conversion of OP Units, MACWH, LP units and preferred stock into common stock) ratio of approximately 53.7% at December 31, 2007. The majority of the Company's debt consists of fixed-rate conventional mortgages payable collateralized by individual properties.
The Company filed a shelf registration statement, effective June 6, 2002, to sell securities. The shelf registration is for a total of $1.0 billion of common stock, common stock warrants or common
49
stock rights. The Company sold a total of 15.2 million shares of common stock under this shelf registration on November 27, 2002. The aggregate offering price of this transaction was approximately $440.2 million, leaving approximately $559.8 million available under the shelf registration statement. In addition, the Company filed another shelf registration statement, effective October 27, 2003, to sell up to $300 million of preferred stock. On January 12, 2006, the Company filed a shelf registration statement registering an unspecified amount of common stock that it may offer in the future.
On March 16, 2007, the Company issued $950 million in convertible senior notes ("Senior Notes") that mature on March 15, 2012. The Senior Notes bear interest at 3.25%, payable semiannually, are senior to unsecured debt of the Company and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Prior to December 14, 2011, upon the occurrence of certain specified events, the Senior Notes will be convertible at the option of holder into cash, shares of the Company's common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common stock, at the election of the Company, at an initial conversion rate of 8.9702 shares per $1,000 principal amount. On and after December 15, 2011, the Senior Notes will be convertible at any time prior to the second business day preceding the maturity date at the option of the holder at the initial conversion rate. The initial conversion price of approximately $111.48 per share represented a 20% premium over the closing price of the Company's common stock on March 12, 2007. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Holders of the Senior Notes do not have the right to require the Company to repurchase the Senior Notes prior to maturity except in connection with the occurrence of certain fundamental change transactions.
In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company purchased two capped calls ("Capped Calls") from affiliates of the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes. The Capped Calls effectively increase the conversion price of the Senior Notes to approximately $130.06, which represented a 40% premium to the March 12, 2007 closing price of $92.90 per common share of the Company.
The Company has a $1.5 billion revolving line of credit that matures on April 25, 2010 with a one-year extension option. The interest rate fluctuates between LIBOR plus 0.75% to LIBOR plus 1.10% depending on the Company's overall leverage. In September 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate on $400.0 million of the outstanding balance of the line of credit at 6.23% until April 25, 2011. On March 16, 2007, the Company repaid $541.5 million of borrowings outstanding from the proceeds of the Senior Notes (See Note 10--Bank and Other Notes Payable of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, borrowings outstanding were $1,015.0 million and $934.5 million, respectively, at an average interest rate, net of the $400.0 million swapped portion, of 6.19% and 6.60%, respectively.
On May 13, 2003, the Company issued $250.0 million in unsecured notes maturing in May 2007 with a one-year extension option bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.50%. On April 25, 2005, the Company modified these unsecured notes and reduced the interest rate to LIBOR plus 1.50%. On March 16, 2007, the Company repaid the notes from the proceeds of the Senior Notes (See Note 10--Bank and Other Notes Payable of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).
On April 25, 2005, the Company obtained a five year, $450.0 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. In November 2005, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate of the $450.0 million term loan at 6.30% from December 1, 2005 to April 15, 2010. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the entire loan was outstanding with an interest rate of 6.30%.
At December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all applicable loan covenants.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had cash and cash equivalents available of $85.3 million.
50
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has an ownership interest in a number of joint ventures as detailed in Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. The Company accounts for those investments that it does not have a controlling interest or is not the primary beneficiary using the equity method of accounting and those investments are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company as "Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures." A pro rata share of the mortgage debt on these properties is shown in "Item 2. Properties--Mortgage Debt."
In addition, certain joint ventures also have debt that could become recourse debt to the Company or its subsidiaries, in excess of the Company's pro rata share, should the joint ventures be unable to discharge the obligations of the related debt.
The following reflects the maximum amount of debt principal that could recourse to the Company at December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
Property |
Recourse Debt |
Maturity Date |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boulevard Shops | $ | 4,280 | 12/17/2010 | ||
Chandler Village Center | 4,375 | 1/15/2011 | |||
$ | 8,655 | ||||
Additionally, as of December 31, 2007, the Company is contingently liable for $6.4 million in letters of credit guaranteeing performance by the Company of certain obligations relating to the Centers. The Company does not believe that these letters of credit will result in a liability to the Company.
Long-term Contractual Obligations
The following is a schedule of long-term contractual obligations (as of December 31, 2007) for the consolidated Centers over the periods in which they are expected to be paid (in thousands):
|
Payment Due by Period |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 year |
1 - 3 years |
3 - 5 years |
More than five years |
||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations (includes expected interest payments) | $ | 6,087,693 | $ | 455,713 | $ | 2,390,249 | $ | 2,014,591 | $ | 1,227,140 | |||||
Operating lease obligations(1) | 670,038 | 14,771 | 29,624 | 29,250 | 596,393 | ||||||||||
Purchase obligations(1) | 103,419 | 103,419 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 393,102 | 393,102 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
$ | 7,254,252 | $ | 967,005 | $ | 2,419,873 | $ | 2,043,841 | $ | 1,823,533 | ||||||
Funds From Operations
The Company uses FFO in addition to net income to report its operating and financial results and considers FFO and FFO--diluted as supplemental measures for the real estate industry and a supplement to GAAP measures. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciated operating properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. FFO
51
and FFO on a fully diluted basis are useful to investors in comparing operating and financial results between periods. This is especially true since FFO excludes real estate depreciation and amortization as the Company believes real estate values fluctuate based on market conditions rather than depreciating in value ratably on a straight-line basis over time. FFO on a fully diluted basis is one of the measures investors find most useful in measuring the dilutive impact of outstanding convertible securities. FFO does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP, should not be considered as an alternative to net income as defined by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs. FFO, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other real estate investment trusts. The reconciliation of FFO and FFO--diluted to net income available to common stockholders is provided below.
The following reconciles net income available to common stockholders to FFO and FFO--diluted (dollars in thousands):
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income--available to common stockholders | $ | 71,661 | $ | 228,022 | $ | 52,588 | $ | 82,493 | $ | 113,218 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to FFO--basic: | |||||||||||||||||
Minority interest in the Operating Partnership | 12,675 | 42,821 | 12,450 | 19,870 | 28,907 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of consolidated assets | (9,771 | ) | (241,732 | ) | (1,530 | ) | (8,041 | ) | (34,451 | ) | |||||||
Add: Gain on undepreciated assets--consolidated assets | 8,047 | 8,827 | 1,068 | 939 | 1,054 | ||||||||||||
Add: Minority interest share of gain on sale of consolidated joint ventures | 760 | 36,831 | 239 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets from unconsolidated entities (pro rata) | (400 | ) | (725 | ) | (1,954 | ) | (3,353 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||
Add: Gain on sale of undepreciated assets--from unconsolidated entities (pro rata) | 2,793 | 725 | 2,092 | 3,464 | 387 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization on consolidated centers | 231,541 | 231,247 | 203,065 | 144,828 | 109,569 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization on joint ventures and from management companies (pro rata) | 88,807 | 82,745 | 73,247 | 61,060 | 45,133 | ||||||||||||
Less: depreciation on personal property and amortization of loan costs and interest rate caps | (8,244 | ) | (15,722 | ) | (14,724 | ) | (11,228 | ) | (9,346 | ) | |||||||
FFO--basic | 397,869 | 373,039 | 326,541 | 290,032 | 254,316 | ||||||||||||
Additional adjustments to arrive at FFO--diluted: | |||||||||||||||||
Impact of convertible preferred stock | 10,058 | 10,083 | 9,648 | 9,140 | 14,816 | ||||||||||||
Impact of non-participating convertible preferred units | -- | -- | 642 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
FFO--diluted | $ | 407,927 | $ | 383,122 | $ | 336,831 | $ | 299,172 | $ | 269,132 | |||||||
Weighted average number of FFO shares outstanding for: | |||||||||||||||||
FFO--basic(1) | 84,467 | 84,138 | 73,250 | 72,715 | 67,332 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for the impact of dilutive securities in computing FFO--diluted: | |||||||||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | 3,512 | 3,627 | 3,627 | 3,627 | 7,386 | ||||||||||||
Non-participating convertible preferred units | -- | -- | 197 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Stock options | 293 | 293 | 323 | 385 | 480 | ||||||||||||
FFO--diluted(2) | 88,272 | 88,058 | 77,397 | 76,727 | 75,198 | ||||||||||||
52
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company's primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The Company has managed and will continue to manage interest rate risk by (1) maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt to total debt such that floating rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level, (2) reducing interest rate exposure on certain long-term floating rate debt through the use of interest rate caps and/or swaps with appropriately matching maturities, (3) using treasury rate locks where appropriate to fix rates on anticipated debt transactions, and (4) taking advantage of favorable market conditions for long-term debt and/or equity.
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2007 concerning the Company's long term debt obligations, including principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair value ("FV") (dollars in thousands):
|
For the years ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
Thereafter |
Total |
FV |
|||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED CENTERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate(1) | $ | 327,747 | $ | 355,615 | $ | 1,036,927 | $ | 718,914 | $ | 1,206,230 | $ | 1,160,003 | $ | 4,805,436 | $ | 4,821,439 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.02% | 6.24% | 6.49% | 5.58% | 4.09% | 5.79% | 5.57% | ||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate | 102,000 | 190,522 | 665,000 | -- | -- | -- | 957,522 | 957,522 | |||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.12% | 6.11% | 6.18% | 6.15% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt--Consolidated Centers | $ | 429,747 | $ | 546,137 | $ | 1,701,927 | $ | 718,914 | $ | 1,206,230 | $ | 1,160,003 | $ | 5,762,958 | $ | 5,778,961 | |||||||||
JOINT VENTURE CENTERS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt (at Company's pro rata share): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 70,356 | $ | 237,996 | $ | 122,203 | $ | 33,504 | $ | 169,206 | $ | 992,184 | $ | 1,625,449 | $ | 1,681,623 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.73% | 5.89% | 6.79% | 6.11% | 6.99% | 5.56% | 5.89% | ||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate | 83,331 | 25,988 | 19,343 | 66,300 | -- | -- | 194,962 | 194,962 | |||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.89% | 7.24% | 6.03% | 5.92% | 6.09% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt--Joint Venture Centers | $ | 153,687 | $ | 263,984 | $ | 141,546 | $ | 99,804 | $ | 169,206 | $ | 992,184 | $ | 1,820,411 | $ | 1,876,585 | |||||||||
The consolidated Centers' total fixed rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $4.8 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively. The average interest rate on fixed rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 5.57% and 5.99%, respectively. The consolidated Centers' total floating rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. The average interest rate on floating rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 6.15% and 6.59%, respectively.
The Company's pro rata share of the Joint Venture Centers' fixed rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively. The average interest rate on fixed rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 5.89% and 5.84%, respectively. The Company's pro rata share of the Joint Venture Centers' floating rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $195.0 million and $198.4 million, respectively. The average interest rate on the floating rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 6.09% and 6.33%, respectively.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage or hedge interest rate risk and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (See "Note 5--Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).
53
The following are outstanding derivatives at December 31, 2007 (amounts in thousands):
Property/Entity |
Notional Amount |
Product |
Rate |
Maturity |
Company's Ownership |
Fair Value(1) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Camelback Colonnade | $ | 41,500 | Cap | 8.54% | 11/15/2008 | 75% | $ | -- | |||||||
Desert Sky Mall | 51,500 | Cap | 7.65% | 3/15/2008 | 50% | -- | |||||||||
Greece Ridge Center | 72,000 | Cap | 7.95% | 12/15/2008 | 100% | -- | |||||||||
La Cumbre Plaza | 30,000 | Cap | 7.12% | 8/9/2008 | 100% | -- | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall | 37,380 | Cap | 7.25% | 2/15/2009 | 15% | -- | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall | 11,500 | Cap | 5.25% | 2/15/2009 | 15% | -- | |||||||||
Panorama Mall | 50,000 | Cap | 6.65% | 3/1/2008 | 100% | -- | |||||||||
Superstition Springs Center | 67,500 | Cap | 8.63% | 9/9/2008 | 33.33% | -- | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall | 112,000 | Swap | 3.86% | 2/15/2009 | 15% | 20 | |||||||||
Metrocenter Mall | 133,597 | Swap | 4.57% | 2/15/2009 | 15% | (154 | ) | ||||||||
The Operating Partnership | 450,000 | Swap | 4.80% | 4/25/2010 | 100% | (11,377 | ) | ||||||||
The Operating Partnership | 400,000 | Swap | 5.33% | 4/25/2011 | 100% | (16,147 | ) |
Interest rate cap agreements ("Cap") offer protection against floating rates on the notional amount from exceeding the rates noted in the above schedule, and interest rate swap agreements ("Swap") effectively replace a floating rate on the notional amount with a fixed rate as noted above.
In addition, the Company has assessed the market risk for its floating rate debt and believes that a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $11.5 million per year based on $1.1 billion outstanding of floating rate debt at December 31, 2007.
The fair value of the Company's long term debt is estimated based on discounted cash flows at interest rates that management believes reflect the risks associated with long term debt of similar risk and duration.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Refer to the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules for the required information appearing in Item 15.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
However, based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2007, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
54
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, the Company's management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in Internal Control--Integrated Framework. The Company's management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
55
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Macerich Company
Santa Monica, California
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of The Macerich Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, of the Company and our report dated
56
February 27, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2008
ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Not Applicable
None
57
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information which appears under the captions "Information Regarding Nominees and Directors," "Executive Officers," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," "Audit Committee Matters" and "Codes of Ethics" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is responsive to the information required by this Item.
During 2007, there were no material changes to the procedures described in the Company's proxy statement relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Company.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information which appears under the caption "Election of Directors" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is responsive to the information required by this Item. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee Report set forth therein shall not be incorporated by reference herein, in any of the Company's prior or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such report by reference therein and shall not be otherwise deemed filed under either of such Acts.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information which appears under the captions "Principal Stockholders," "Information Regarding Nominees and Directors" and "Executive Officers" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is responsive to the information required by this Item.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company currently maintains two equity compensation plans for the granting of equity awards to directors, officers and employees: the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan ("2003 Plan") and the Eligible Directors' Deferred Compensation/Phantom Stock Plan ("Director Phantom Stock Plan"). Certain of the Company's outstanding stock awards were granted under other equity compensation plans which are no longer available for stock awards: the 1994 Eligible Directors' Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan"), the Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan (the "1994 Plan") and the 2000 Incentive Plan (the "2000 Plan").
58
Summary Table
The following table sets forth, for the Company's equity compensation plans, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding options, warrants and rights, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, and the number of shares remaining available for future award grants as of December 31, 2007.
Plan Category |
Number of shares of Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1) (b) |
Number of shares of Common stock remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares reflected in column(a)) (c) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity Compensation Plans approved by stockholders | 879,664 | (2) | $ | 35.54 | 5,664,249 | (3) | |||
Equity Compensation Plans not approved by stockholders | 15,000 | (4) | $ | 30.75 | -- | ||||
Total | 894,664 | $ | 35.46 | 5,664,249 | |||||
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information which appears under the captions "Certain Transactions" and "The Board of Directors and its Committees" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is responsive to the information required by this Item.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
There is hereby incorporated by reference the information which appears under the captions "Principal Accountant Fees and Services" and "Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is responsive to the information required by this Item.
59
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
Page |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) and (c) | 1. | Financial Statements of the Company | ||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
61 |
|||||
Consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 |
62 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
63 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of common stockholders' equity of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
64 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of cash flows of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
65 |
|||||
Notes to consolidated financial statements |
67 |
|||||
2. |
Financial Statements of Pacific Premier Retail Trust |
|||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
105 |
|||||
Consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Premier Retail Trust as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 |
106 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of operations of Pacific Premier Retail Trust for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
107 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity of Pacific Premier Retail Trust for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
108 |
|||||
Consolidated statements of cash flows of Pacific Premier Retail Trust for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
109 |
|||||
Notes to consolidated financial statements |
110 |
|||||
3. |
Financial Statements of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. |
|||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
119 |
|||||
Balance sheets of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 |
120 |
|||||
Statements of operations of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
121 |
|||||
Statements of cash flows of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
122 |
|||||
Statements of partners' equity of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 |
123 |
|||||
Notes to financial statements |
124 |
|||||
4. |
Financial Statement Schedules |
|||||
Schedule III--Real estate and accumulated depreciation of the Company |
130 |
|||||
Schedule III--Real estate and accumulated depreciation of Pacific Premier Retail Trust |
134 |
|||||
Schedule III--Real estate and accumulated depreciation of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P |
136 |
|||||
(b) |
1. |
Exhibits |
||||
The Exhibit Index attached hereto is incorporated by reference under this item |
139 |
60
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Macerich Company
Santa Monica, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Macerich Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, common stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(4). These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We did not audit the consolidated financial statements or the consolidated financial statement schedules of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. (the "Partnership"), the Company's investment in which is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting. The Company's equity of $38,947,000 and $50,696,000 in the Partnership's net assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $7,324,000, $11,197,000 and $15,537,000 in the Partnership's net income for the three years ended December 31, 2007 are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the Partnership, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our report and the reports of other auditors, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Macerich Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2008
61
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||||
ASSETS: | |||||||||
Property, net | $ | 6,321,491 | $ | 5,755,283 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 85,273 | 269,435 | |||||||
Restricted cash | 68,384 | 66,376 | |||||||
Marketable securities | 29,043 | 30,019 | |||||||
Tenant receivables, net | 137,498 | 117,855 | |||||||
Deferred charges and other assets, net | 386,802 | 307,825 | |||||||
Loans to unconsolidated joint ventures | 604 | 708 | |||||||
Due from affiliates | 5,729 | 4,282 | |||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 835,662 | 1,010,380 | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 250,648 | -- | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 8,121,134 | $ | 7,562,163 | |||||
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|||||||||
Mortgage notes payable: | |||||||||
Related parties | $ | 225,848 | $ | 151,311 | |||||
Others | 3,102,422 | 3,179,787 | |||||||
Total | 3,328,270 | 3,331,098 | |||||||
Bank and other notes payable | 2,434,688 | 1,662,781 | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 97,086 | 86,127 | |||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 289,660 | 212,249 | |||||||
Preferred dividends payable | 6,356 | 6,199 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 6,156,060 | 5,298,454 | |||||||
Minority interest | 338,700 | 387,183 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||||
Class A participating convertible preferred units | 213,786 | 213,786 | |||||||
Class A non-participating convertible preferred units | 16,459 | 21,501 | |||||||
Series A cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value, 3,627,131 shares authorized, 3,067,131 and 3,627,131 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively | 83,495 | 98,934 | |||||||
Common stockholders' equity: | |||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 145,000,000 shares authorized, 72,311,763 and 71,567,908 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively | 723 | 716 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,654,199 | 1,717,498 | |||||||
Accumulated deficit | (317,780 | ) | (178,249 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (24,508 | ) | 2,340 | ||||||
Total common stockholders' equity | 1,312,634 | 1,542,305 | |||||||
Total liabilities, preferred stock and common stockholders' equity | $ | 8,121,134 | $ | 7,562,163 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
62
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
For The Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 521,122 | $ | 489,078 | $ | 423,759 | ||||||
Percentage rents | 26,816 | 24,667 | 24,152 | |||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 273,913 | 254,526 | 214,832 | |||||||||
Management Companies | 39,752 | 31,456 | 26,128 | |||||||||
Other | 34,765 | 29,929 | 22,953 | |||||||||
Total revenues | 896,368 | 829,656 | 711,824 | |||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Shopping center and operating expenses | 284,687 | 262,127 | 223,905 | |||||||||
Management Companies' operating expenses | 73,761 | 56,673 | 52,840 | |||||||||
REIT general and administrative expenses | 16,600 | 13,532 | 12,106 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 236,241 | 224,273 | 193,145 | |||||||||
611,289 | 556,605 | 481,996 | ||||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||
Related parties | 13,390 | 10,858 | 9,638 | |||||||||
Other | 250,336 | 263,809 | 227,459 | |||||||||
263,726 | 274,667 | 237,097 | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 875,015 | 831,272 | 719,093 | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated joint ventures | (3,730 | ) | (3,667 | ) | (700 | ) | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | 81,458 | 86,053 | 76,303 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | 470 | (33 | ) | 2,031 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | 12,146 | 38 | 1,253 | |||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (877 | ) | (1,835 | ) | (1,666 | ) | ||||||
Income from continuing operations | 110,820 | 78,940 | 69,952 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of assets | (2,409 | ) | 204,863 | 277 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | 804 | 11,376 | 13,907 | |||||||||
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations | (1,605 | ) | 216,239 | 14,184 | ||||||||
Income before minority interest and preferred dividends | 109,215 | 295,179 | 84,136 | |||||||||
Less: minority interest in Operating Partnership | 12,675 | 42,821 | 12,450 | |||||||||
Net income | 96,540 | 252,358 | 71,686 | |||||||||
Less: preferred dividends | 24,879 | 24,336 | 19,098 | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 71,661 | $ | 228,022 | $ | 52,588 | ||||||
Earnings per common sharebasic: | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.70 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 2.57 | 0.19 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1.00 | $ | 3.22 | $ | 0.89 | ||||||
Earnings per common sharediluted: | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 2.46 | 0.19 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1.00 | $ | 3.19 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 71,768,000 | 70,826,000 | 59,279,000 | |||||||||
Diluted | 84,760,000 | 88,058,000 | 73,573,000 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
63
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) income |
Unamortized Restricted Stock |
Total Common Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Par Value |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2005 | 58,785,694 | $ | 586 | $ | 1,029,940 | $ | (103,489 | ) | $ | 1,092 | $ | (14,596 | ) | $ | 913,533 | |||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | 71,686 | -- | -- | 71,686 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassification of deferred losses | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,351 | -- | 1,351 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap/cap agreements | -- | -- | -- | -- | (2,356 | ) | -- | (2,356 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | -- | -- | -- | 71,686 | (1,005 | ) | -- | 70,681 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock | 260,898 | 3 | 12,393 | -- | -- | -- | 12,396 | |||||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock | (260,898 | ) | (3 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (12,393 | ) | (12,396 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of share and unit-based plans | 247,371 | 3 | -- | -- | -- | 11,525 | 11,528 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 182,237 | 2 | 4,595 | -- | -- | -- | 4,597 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid ($2.63) per share | -- | -- | -- | (158,104 | ) | -- | -- | (158,104 | ) | |||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | -- | -- | -- | (19,098 | ) | -- | -- | (19,098 | ) | |||||||||||||
Conversion of Operating Partnership Units | 726,250 | 8 | 21,587 | -- | -- | -- | 21,595 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect minority interest on a pro rata basis for period end ownership percentage of Operating Partnership Units | -- | -- | (17,624 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (17,624 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2005 | 59,941,552 | 599 | 1,050,891 | (209,005 | ) | 87 | (15,464 | ) | 827,108 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | 252,358 | -- | -- | 252,358 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassification of deferred losses | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,510 | -- | 1,510 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap/cap agreements | -- | -- | -- | -- | 743 | -- | 743 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | -- | -- | -- | 252,358 | 2,253 | -- | 254,611 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of share and unit-based plans | 415,787 | 4 | 15,406 | -- | -- | -- | 15,410 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 14,101 | -- | 260 | -- | -- | -- | 260 | |||||||||||||||
Employee stock purchases | 3,365 | -- | 203 | -- | -- | -- | 203 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock offering, gross | 10,952,381 | 110 | 761,081 | -- | -- | -- | 761,191 | |||||||||||||||
Underwriting and offering costs | -- | -- | (14,706 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (14,706 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions paid ($2.75) per share | -- | -- | -- | (197,266 | ) | -- | -- | (197,266 | ) | |||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | -- | -- | -- | (24,336 | ) | -- | -- | (24,336 | ) | |||||||||||||
Conversion of Operating Partnership Units | 240,722 | 3 | 9,916 | -- | -- | -- | 9,919 | |||||||||||||||
Change in accounting principle due to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) | (15,464 | ) | 15,464 | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) | -- | -- | 6,000 | -- | -- | -- | 6,000 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect minority interest on a pro rata basis for period end ownership percentage of Operating Partnership Units | -- | -- | (96,089 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (96,089 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2006 | 71,567,908 | 716 | 1,717,498 | (178,249 | ) | 2,340 | -- | 1,542,305 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | 96,540 | -- | -- | 96,540 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassification of deferred losses | -- | -- | -- | -- | 967 | -- | 967 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap/cap agreements | -- | -- | -- | -- | (27,815 | ) | -- | (27,815 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | -- | -- | -- | 96,540 | (26,848 | ) | -- | 69,692 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of share and unit-based plans | 215,132 | 2 | 21,407 | -- | -- | -- | 21,409 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 23,500 | -- | 672 | -- | -- | -- | 672 | |||||||||||||||
Employee stock purchases | 13,184 | -- | 881 | -- | -- | -- | 881 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid ($2.93) per share | -- | -- | -- | (211,192 | ) | -- | -- | (211,192 | ) | |||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | -- | -- | -- | (24,879 | ) | -- | -- | (24,879 | ) | |||||||||||||
Conversion of partnership units and Class A non-participating convertible preferred units | 739,039 | 7 | 20,757 | -- | -- | -- | 20,764 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (807,000 | ) | (8 | ) | (74,962 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (74,970 | ) | |||||||||||
Conversion of preferred shares to common shares | 560,000 | 6 | 15,433 | -- | -- | -- | 15,439 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of capped calls on convertible senior notes | -- | -- | (59,850 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (59,850 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in accounting principle due to adoption of FIN 48 | -- | -- | (1,574 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,574 | ) | |||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect minority interest on a pro rata basis for period end ownership percentage of Operating Partnership units | -- | -- | 13,937 | -- | -- | -- | 13,937 | |||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2007 | 72,311,763 | $ | 723 | $ | 1,654,199 | $ | (317,780 | ) | $ | (24,508 | ) | $ | -- | $ | 1,312,634 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
64
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
For The Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 71,661 | $ | 228,022 | $ | 52,588 | |||||||
Preferred dividends | 24,879 | 24,336 | 19,098 | ||||||||||
Net income | 96,540 | 252,358 | 71,686 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 877 | 1,835 | 1,666 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | (12,146 | ) | (38 | ) | (1,253 | ) | |||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets of discontinued operations | 2,409 | (204,863 | ) | (277 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 243,095 | 236,670 | 208,932 | ||||||||||
Amortization of net premium on mortgage and bank and other notes payable | (9,883 | ) | (11,835 | ) | (10,193 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of share and unit-based plans | 12,344 | 9,607 | 8,286 | ||||||||||
Minority interest in Operating Partnership | 12,675 | 42,821 | 12,450 | ||||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated joint ventures | 3,736 | 4,101 | 600 | ||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures | (81,458 | ) | (86,053 | ) | (76,303 | ) | |||||||
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures | 4,118 | 4,106 | 9,010 | ||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: | |||||||||||||
Tenant receivables, net | (20,001 | ) | (22,319 | ) | (6,400 | ) | |||||||
Other assets | (33,375 | ) | 8,303 | 31,517 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 23,959 | (14,000 | ) | 5,181 | |||||||||
Due from affiliates | (1,477 | ) | (24 | ) | (14,276 | ) | |||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 84,657 | (8,819 | ) | (5,330 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 326,070 | 211,850 | 235,296 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions of property, development, redevelopment and property improvements | (1,043,800 | ) | (822,903 | ) | (171,842 | ) | |||||||
Payment of acquisition deposits | (51,943 | ) | -- | -- | |||||||||
Issuance of note receivable | -- | (10,000 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Purchase of marketable securities | -- | (30,307 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Maturities of marketable securities | 1,322 | 444 | -- | ||||||||||
Deferred leasing costs | (34,753 | ) | (29,688 | ) | (21,837 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures | 274,303 | 187,269 | 155,537 | ||||||||||
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures | (38,769 | ) | (31,499 | ) | (101,429 | ) | |||||||
Repayments of loans to unconsolidated joint ventures | 104 | 707 | 5,228 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 30,261 | 610,578 | 6,945 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash | (2,008 | ) | (1,337 | ) | (4,550 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (865,283 | ) | (126,736 | ) | (131,948 | ) | |||||||
65
THE MACERICH COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from mortgages and bank and other notes payable | 2,296,530 | 1,912,179 | 483,127 | ||||||||||
Payments on mortgages and bank and other notes payable | (1,535,017 | ) | (2,329,827 | ) | (286,369 | ) | |||||||
Deferred financing costs | (2,482 | ) | (6,886 | ) | (4,141 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of Capped Calls | (59,850 | ) | -- | -- | |||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (74,970 | ) | -- | -- | |||||||||
Proceeds from share and unit-based plans | 1,553 | 463 | 4,597 | ||||||||||
Net proceeds from stock offering | -- | 746,805 | -- | ||||||||||
Dividends and distributions | (245,991 | ) | (269,419 | ) | (202,078 | ) | |||||||
Dividends to preferred stockholders / preferred unit holders | (24,722 | ) | (24,107 | ) | (15,485 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 355,051 | 29,208 | (20,349 | ) | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash | (184,162 | ) | 114,322 | 82,999 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 269,435 | 155,113 | 72,114 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 85,273 | $ | 269,435 | $ | 155,113 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | |||||||||||||
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 280,820 | $ | 282,987 | $ | 244,474 | |||||||
Non-cash transactions: | |||||||||||||
Increase in other accrued liabilities and additional paid-in capital recorded upon adoption of FIN 48 | $ | 1,574 | $ | -- | $ | -- | |||||||
Reclassification from other accrued liabilities to additional paid-in capital recorded upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) | $ | -- | $ | 6,000 | $ | -- | |||||||
Accrued development costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities | $ | 54,308 | $ | 25,754 | $ | 9,697 | |||||||
Acquisition of property by issuance of bank notes payable | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 1,198,503 | |||||||
Acquisition of property by assumption of mortgage notes payable | $ | 4,300 | $ | -- | $ | 809,542 | |||||||
Acquisition of property by issuance of convertible preferred units and common units | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 241,103 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
66
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Organization:
The Macerich Company (the "Company") is involved in the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community shopping centers (the "Centers") located throughout the United States.
The Company commenced operations effective with the completion of its initial public offering on March 16, 1994. As of December 31, 2007, the Company is the sole general partner of and assuming conversion of the preferred units holds an 85% ownership interest in The Macerich Partnership, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"). The interests in the Operating Partnership are known as OP Units. OP Units not held by the Company are redeemable, subject to certain restrictions, on a one-for-one basis for the Company's common stock or cash at the Company's option.
The Company was organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The 15% limited partnership interest of the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company is reflected in these financial statements as minority interest.
The property management, leasing and redevelopment of the Company's portfolio is provided by the Company's management companies, Macerich Property Management Company, LLC, ("MPMC, LLC") a single member Delaware limited liability company, Macerich Management Company ("MMC"), a California corporation, Westcor Partners, L.L.C., a single member Arizona limited liability company, Macerich Westcor Management LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company, Westcor Partners of Colorado, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, MACW Mall Management, Inc., a New York corporation, and MACW Property Management, LLC, a New York single member limited liability company. These last two management companies are collectively referred to herein as the "Wilmorite Management Companies." The three Westcor management companies are collectively referred to herein as the "Westcor Management Companies." All seven of the management companies are collectively referred to herein as the "Management Companies."
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis of Presentation:
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership. Investments in entities that are controlled by the Company or meet the definition of a variable interest entity in which an enterprise absorbs the majority of the entity's expected losses, receives a majority of the entity's expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the entity are consolidated; otherwise they are accounted for under the equity method and are reflected as "Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures". All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents, for which cost approximates fair value. Restricted cash includes impounds of property taxes and other capital reserves required under the loan agreements.
67
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
Tenant Receivables:
Included in tenant receivables are allowances for doubtful accounts of $2,417 and $2,700 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Also included in tenant receivables are accrued percentage rents of $10,067 and $11,086 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Revenues:
Minimum rental revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The difference between the amount of rent due in a year and the amount recorded as rental income is referred to as the "straight-line rent adjustment." Rental income was increased by $10,217, $7,759 and $6,703 due to the straight-line rent adjustment during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Percentage rents are recognized and accrued when tenants' specified sales targets have been met.
Estimated recoveries from certain tenants for their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance and other shopping center operating expenses are recognized as revenues in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. Other tenants pay a fixed rate and these tenant recoveries are recognized into revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.
The Management Companies provide property management, leasing, corporate, development, redevelopment and acquisition services to affiliated and non-affiliated shopping centers. In consideration for these services, the Management Companies receive monthly management fees generally ranging from 1.5% to 6% of the gross monthly rental revenue of the properties managed.
Property:
Costs related to the development, redevelopment, construction and improvement of properties are capitalized. Interest incurred on development, redevelopment and construction projects is capitalized until construction is substantially complete.
Maintenance and repairs expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Costs for major replacements and betterments, which includes HVAC equipment, roofs, parking lots, etc., are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Gains and losses are recognized upon disposal or retirement of the related assets and are reflected in earnings.
Property is recorded at cost and is depreciated using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements | 5-40 years | |
Tenant improvements | 5-7 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5-7 years |
Acquisitions:
The Company accounts for all acquisitions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations." The Company first determines the value of the
68
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
land and buildings utilizing an "as if vacant" methodology. The Company then assigns a fair value to any debt assumed at acquisition. The balance of the purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets associated with the existing leases valued on a fair market value basis at the acquisition date prorated over the remaining lease terms. The tenant improvements are classified as an asset under real estate investments and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms: (i) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with "cost avoidance" of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms generally experienced in the Company's markets; (ii) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurred for the period required to lease the "assumed vacant" property to the occupancy level when purchased; and (iii) above or below market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. Leasing commissions and legal costs are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and are amortized over the remaining lease terms. The value of in-place leases are recorded in deferred charges and other assets and amortized over the remaining lease terms plus an estimate of renewal of the acquired leases. Above or below market leases are classified in deferred charges and other assets or in other accrued liabilities, depending on whether the contractual terms are above or below market, and the asset or liability is amortized to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the leases.
When the Company acquires real estate properties, the Company allocates the purchase price to the components of these acquisitions using relative fair values computed using its estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of costs allocated between various components as well as the amount of costs assigned to individual properties in multiple property acquisitions. These allocations also impact depreciation expense and gains or losses recorded on future sales of properties.
Marketable Securities:
The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities as held-to-maturity debt securities under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," as the Company has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until maturity. Accordingly, investments in marketable securities are carried at their amortized cost. The discount on marketable securities is amortized into interest income on a straight-line basis over the term of the notes, which approximates the effective interest method.
Deferred Charges:
Costs relating to obtaining tenant leases are deferred and amortized over the initial term of the agreement using the straight-line method. Costs relating to financing of shopping center properties are deferred and amortized over the life of the related loan using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. In-place lease values are amortized over the remaining lease term plus an estimate of renewal. Leasing commissions and legal costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the individual lease years.
69
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
The range of the terms of the agreements is as follows:
Deferred lease costs | 1-15 years | |
Deferred financing costs | 1-15 years | |
In-place lease values | Remaining lease term plus an estimate for renewal | |
Leasing commissions and legal costs | 5-10 years |
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets:
The Company assesses whether there has been impairment in the value of its long-lived assets by considering expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Such factors include the tenants' ability to perform their duties and pay rent under the terms of the leases. The determination of recoverability is made based upon the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, excluding interest expense. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value, as determined by an undiscounted cash flows analysis, with the carrying value of the related assets. Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Management does not believe impairment has occurred in its net property carrying values at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Company calculates the fair value of financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to consolidated financial statements when the fair value is different than the carrying value of those financial instruments. When the fair value reasonably approximates the carrying value, no additional disclosure is made. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Concentration of Risk:
The Company maintains its cash accounts in a number of commercial banks. Accounts at these banks are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $100. At various times during the year, the Company had deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.
No Center or tenant generated more than 10% of total revenues during 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Mervyn's represented 3.3% and Limited Brands, Inc. represented 3.5% and 4.1% of the minimum rents for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No other retailer represented more than 2.7%, 2.9% and 3.6% of the minimum rents during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
70
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
Management Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123 (revised), "Share-Based Payment." SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The Company adopted this statement as of January 1, 2006. See Note 16--Share and Unit-Based Plans, for the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on the results of operations.
In March 2005, FASB issued Interpretation No. 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations--an interpretation of SFAS No. 143." FIN 47 requires that a liability be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Company adopted FIN 47 on January 1, 2005. As a result of the Company's adoption, the Company recorded an additional liability of $615 in 2005.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments--An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140." This statement amended SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. This statement also established a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition of previously recognized income tax benefits, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. See Note 19--Income Taxes for the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 108. SAB No. 108 establishes a framework for quantifying materiality of financial statement misstatements. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
71
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 ("FSP FAS 157-1"). FSP FAS 157-1 defers the effective date of Statement 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-1 also excludes from the scope of SFAS 157 certain leasing transactions accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The Company adopted SFAS 157 and FSP FAS 157-1 on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 and FSP FAS 157-1 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities--Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS No. 159 permits, at the option of the reporting entity, measurement of certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition as the Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to eligible financial instruments on that date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised), "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141(R) requires all assets and assumed liabilities, including contingent liabilities, in a business combination to be recorded at their acquisition-date fair value rather than at historical costs. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 141 (R) on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements--an amendment to ARB No. 51". SFAS No. 160 clarifies the accounting for noncontrolling interest or minority interest in a subsidiary included in consolidated financial statements. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and the Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
3. Earnings per Share ("EPS"):
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on net income and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The computation of diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of share and unit-based compensation plans and convertible senior notes calculated using the treasury stock method and the dilutive effect of all other dilutive securities calculated using the "if converted" method. The OP Units and MACWH, LP common units not held by the Company have been included in the diluted EPS calculation since they may be redeemed on a one-for-one basis for common stock or cash, at the Company's option.
72
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
3. Earnings per Share ("EPS"): (Continued)
The following table reconciles the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Net Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
Net Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
Net Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
|||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 96,540 | $ | 252,358 | $ | 71,686 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: preferred dividends(1) | 24,879 | 24,336 | 19,098 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | 71,661 | 71,768 | $ | 1.00 | 228,022 | 70,826 | $ | 3.22 | 52,588 | 59,279 | $ | 0.89 | ||||||||||||
Diluted EPS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of partnership units | 12,675 | 12,699 | 42,821 | 13,312 | 12,450 | 13,971 | ||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options | -- | 293 | -- | 293 | -- | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock(2) | -- | -- | 10,083 | 3,627 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 84,336 | 84,760 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 280,926 | 88,058 | $ | 3.19 | $ | 65,038 | 73,573 | $ | 0.88 | |||||||||
The minority interest of the Operating Partnership as reflected in the Company's consolidated statements of operations has been allocated for EPS calculations as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income from continuing operations | $ | 12,917 | $ | 8,634 | $ | 9,756 | ||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of assets | (361 | ) | 32,390 | 53 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations | 119 | 1,797 | 2,641 | |||||||
Total minority interest in Operating Partnership | $ | 12,675 | $ | 42,821 | $ | 12,450 | ||||
The Company had an 85% and an 84% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The remaining 15% and 16% limited partnership interest as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, was owned by certain of the Company's executive officers and directors, certain of their affiliates, and other outside investors in the form of limited partnership units. The limited partnership units may be redeemed on a one-for-one basis for common shares or cash, at the Company's option. The redemption value for each limited partnership unit of the Company as of any balance sheet date is the amount equal to the average of the closing quoted price per share of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the ten trading days immediately preceding the respective balance sheet date. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the aggregate redemption value of the then-outstanding OP units not owned by the Company was $904,150 and $1,107,097, respectively.
73
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
The following are the Company's investments in various joint ventures or properties jointly owned with third parties. The Operating Partnership's interest in each joint venture as of December 31, 2007 is as follows:
Joint Venture |
Operating Partnership's Ownership %(1) |
|
---|---|---|
Biltmore Shopping Center Partners LLC | 50.0% | |
Camelback Colonnade SPE LLC | 75.0% | |
Chandler Festival SPE, LLC | 50.0% | |
Chandler Gateway SPE LLC | 50.0% | |
Chandler Village Center, LLC | 50.0% | |
Coolidge Holding LLC | 37.5% | |
Corte Madera Village, LLC | 50.1% | |
Desert Sky Mall--Tenants in Common | 50.0% | |
East Mesa Land, L.L.C. | 50.0% | |
East Mesa Mall, L.L.C.--Superstition Springs Center | 33.3% | |
Jaren Associates #4 | 12.5% | |
Kierland Tower Lofts, LLC | 15.0% | |
Macerich Northwestern Associates | 50.0% | |
Macerich SanTan Village Phase 2 SPE LLCSanTan Village Power Center | 34.9% | |
MetroRising AMS Holding LLC | 15.0% | |
New River Associates--Arrowhead Towne Center | 33.3% | |
NorthPark Land Partners, LP | 50.0% | |
NorthPark Partners, LP | 50.0% | |
Pacific Premier Retail Trust | 51.0% | |
PHXAZ/Kierland Commons, L.L.C. | 24.5% | |
Propcor Associates | 25.0% | |
Propcor II Associates, LLC--Boulevard Shops | 50.0% | |
Scottsdale Fashion Square Partnership | 50.0% | |
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. | 50.0% | |
The Market at Estrella Falls LLC | 35.1% | |
Tysons Corner Holdings LLC | 50.0% | |
Tysons Corner LLC | 50.0% | |
Tysons Corner Property Holdings II LLC | 50.0% | |
Tysons Corner Property Holdings LLC | 50.0% | |
Tysons Corner Property LLC | 50.0% | |
W.M. Inland, L.L.C. | 50.0% | |
West Acres Development, LLP | 19.0% | |
Westcor/Gilbert, L.L.C. | 50.0% | |
Westcor/Goodyear, L.L.C. | 50.0% | |
Westcor/Queen Creek Commercial LLC | 37.7% | |
Westcor/Queen Creek LLC | 37.7% | |
Westcor/Queen Creek Medical LLC | 37.7% |
74
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Westcor/Queen Creek Residential LLC | 37.6% | |
Westcor/Surprise Auto Park LLC | 33.3% | |
Westpen Associates | 50.0% | |
WM Ridgmar, L.P. | 50.0% | |
Wilshire Building--Tenants in Common | 30.0% |
The Company generally accounts for its investments in joint ventures using the equity method unless the Company has a controlling interest in the joint venture or is the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity. Although the Company has a greater than 50% interest in Pacific Premier Retail Trust, Camelback Colonnade SPE LLC and Corte Madera Village, LLC, the Company shares management control with the partners in these joint ventures and therefore, accounts for these joint ventures using the equity method of accounting.
The Company has acquired the following investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
On January 11, 2005, the Company became a 15% owner in a joint venture that acquired Metrocenter Mall, a 1.1 million square foot super-regional mall in Phoenix, Arizona. The total purchase price was $160,000 and concurrently with the acquisition, the joint venture placed a $112,000 floating rate loan on the property. The Company's share of the purchase price, net of the debt, was $7,200 which was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The results of Metrocenter Mall are included below for the period subsequent to its date of acquisition.
On January 21, 2005, the Company formed a 50/50 joint venture with a private investment company. The joint venture acquired a 49% interest in Kierland Commons, a 435,022 square foot mixed use center in Phoenix, Arizona. The joint venture's purchase price for the interest in the center was $49,000. The Company assumed its share of the underlying property debt and funded the remainder of its share of the purchase price by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The results of Kierland Commons are included below for the period subsequent to its date of acquisition.
On April 8, 2005, the Company in a 50/50 joint venture with an affiliate of Walton Street Capital, LLC, acquired Ridgmar Mall, a 1.3 million square foot super-regional mall in Fort Worth, Texas. The total purchase price was $71,075 and concurrently with the transaction, the joint venture placed a $57,400 fixed rate loan of 6.0725% on the property. The balance of the Company's pro rata share, $6,838, of the purchase price was funded by borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The results of Ridgmar Mall are included below for the period subsequent to its date of acquisition.
On April 25, 2005, as part of the Wilmorite acquisition (See Note 12--Acquisitions), the Company became a 50% joint venture partner in Tysons Corner Center, a 2.2 million square foot super-regional
75
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
mall in McLean, Virginia. The results of Tysons Corner Center are included below for the period subsequent to its date of acquisition.
On September 5, 2007, the Company purchased the remaining 50% outside ownership interest in Hilton Village, a 96,546 square foot specialty center in Scottsdale, Arizona. The total purchase price of $13,500 was funded by cash, borrowings under the Company's line of credit and the assumption of a mortgage note payable. The Center was previously accounted for under the equity method as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures.
On October 25, 2007, the Company purchased a 30% tenants-in-common interest in the Wilshire Building, a 40,000 square foot strip center in Santa Monica, California. The total purchase price of $27,000 was funded by cash, borrowings under the Company's line of credit and the assumption of an $6,650 mortgage note payable. The results of the Wilshire Building are included below for the period subsequent to its date of acquisition.
Combined and condensed balance sheets and statements of operations are presented below for all unconsolidated joint ventures.
Combined and Condensed Balance Sheets of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures as of December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets(1): | |||||||
Properties, net | $ | 4,294,147 | $ | 4,251,765 | |||
Other assets | 456,919 | 429,028 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 4,751,066 | $ | 4,680,793 | |||
Liabilities and partners' capital(1): | |||||||
Mortgage notes payable(2) | $ | 3,865,593 | $ | 3,515,154 | |||
Other liabilities | 183,884 | 140,889 | |||||
The Company's capital(3) | 401,333 | 559,172 | |||||
Outside partners' capital | 300,256 | 465,578 | |||||
Total liabilities and partners' capital | $ | 4,751,066 | $ | 4,680,793 | |||
|
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. |
Pacific Premier Retail Trust |
Tysons Corner LLC |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of December 31, 2007: | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 904,186 | $ | 1,026,973 | $ | 640,179 | |||
Total Liabilities | $ | 826,291 | $ | 842,816 | $ | 364,554 | |||
As of December 31, 2006: |
|||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 924,720 | $ | 1,027,132 | $ | 644,545 | |||
Total Liabilities | $ | 823,327 | $ | 848,070 | $ | 371,360 |
76
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Combined and Condensed Statements of Operations of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
|
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. |
Pacific Premier Retail Trust |
Tysons Corner LLC |
Other Joint Ventures |
Total |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 97,626 | $ | 125,558 | $ | 64,182 | $ | 238,350 | $ | 525,716 | ||||||||
Percentage rents | 5,614 | 7,409 | 2,170 | 19,907 | 35,100 | |||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 52,786 | 50,435 | 31,237 | 116,692 | 251,150 | |||||||||||||
Other | 2,955 | 4,237 | 2,115 | 22,871 | 32,178 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 158,981 | 187,639 | 99,704 | 397,820 | 844,144 | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Shopping center and operating expenses | 63,985 | 52,766 | 25,883 | 135,123 | 277,757 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | 46,598 | 49,524 | 16,682 | 108,006 | 220,810 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 29,730 | 30,970 | 20,547 | 88,374 | 169,621 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 140,313 | 133,260 | 63,112 | 331,503 | 668,188 | |||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of assets | (4,020 | ) | -- | -- | 6,959 | 2,939 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 14,648 | $ | 54,379 | $ | 36,592 | $ | 73,276 | $ | 178,895 | ||||||||
Company's equity in net income | $ | 7,324 | $ | 27,868 | $ | 18,296 | $ | 27,970 | $ | 81,458 | ||||||||
77
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 97,843 | $ | 124,103 | $ | 59,580 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 506,526 | ||||||||
Percentage rents | 4,855 | 7,611 | 2,107 | 21,850 | 36,423 | |||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 51,480 | 48,739 | 28,513 | 107,288 | 236,020 | |||||||||||||
Other | 3,437 | 4,166 | 2,051 | 22,876 | 32,530 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 157,615 | 184,619 | 92,251 | 377,014 | 811,499 | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Shopping center and operating expenses | 62,770 | 51,441 | 25,557 | 128,498 | 268,266 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | 44,393 | 50,981 | 16,995 | 90,064 | 202,433 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 28,058 | 29,554 | 20,478 | 78,071 | 156,161 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 135,221 | 131,976 | 63,030 | 296,633 | 626,860 | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | -- | -- | -- | 1,742 | 1,742 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 22,394 | $ | 52,643 | $ | 29,221 | $ | 82,123 | $ | 186,381 | ||||||||
Company's equity in net income | $ | 11,197 | $ | 26,802 | $ | 14,610 | $ | 33,444 | $ | 86,053 | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 96,509 | $ | 116,421 | $ | 34,218 | $ | 181,857 | $ | 429,005 | ||||||||
Percentage rents | 4,783 | 7,171 | 1,479 | 15,089 | 28,522 | |||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 50,381 | 42,455 | 15,774 | 82,723 | 191,333 | |||||||||||||
Other | 3,397 | 3,852 | 817 | 18,272 | 26,338 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 155,070 | 169,899 | 52,288 | 297,941 | 675,198 | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Shopping center and operating expenses | 62,466 | 46,682 | 15,395 | 102,298 | 226,841 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | 34,758 | 49,476 | 9,388 | 69,346 | 162,968 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 27,128 | 27,567 | 9,986 | 61,955 | 126,636 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 124,352 | 123,725 | 34,769 | 233,599 | 516,445 | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets | 356 | -- | -- | 15,161 | 15,517 | |||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | -- | (13 | ) | -- | -- | (13 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 31,074 | $ | 46,161 | $ | 17,519 | $ | 79,503 | $ | 174,257 | ||||||||
Company's equity in net income | $ | 15,537 | $ | 23,583 | $ | 4,994 | $ | 32,189 | $ | 76,303 | ||||||||
78
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: (Continued)
Significant accounting policies used by the unconsolidated joint ventures are similar to those used by the Company. Included in mortgage notes payable are amounts due to affiliates of Northwestern Mutual Life ("NML") of $125,984 and $132,170 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively. NML is considered a related party because they are a joint venture partner with the Company in Macerich Northwestern Associates. Interest expense incurred on these borrowings amounted to $8,678, $9,082 and $9,422 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
The Company recognizes all derivatives in the consolidated financial statements and measures the derivatives at fair value. The Company uses derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage or reduce its exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates. The Company designs its hedges to be effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. Any instrument that meets the cash flow hedging criteria in SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," is formally designated as a cash flow hedge at the inception of the derivative contract. On an ongoing quarterly basis, the Company adjusts its balance sheet to reflect the current fair value of its derivatives. To the extent they are effective, changes in fair value of derivatives are recorded in comprehensive income. Ineffective portions, if any, are included in net income. No ineffectiveness was recorded in net income during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005. If any derivative instrument used for risk management does not meet the hedging criteria, it is marked-to-market each period in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2007, three of the Company's derivative instruments were not designated as cash flow hedges. Changes in the market value of these derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had $286 and $1,252, respectively, reflected in other comprehensive income related to treasury rate locks settled in prior years. The Company reclassified $967, $1,510 and $1,351 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to treasury rate lock transactions settled in prior years from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings. It is anticipated that the remaining $286 will be reclassified during 2008.
Interest rate swap and cap agreements are purchased by the Company from third parties to manage the risk of interest rate changes on some of the Company's floating rate debt. Payments received as a result of these agreements are recorded as a reduction of interest expense. The fair value of the instrument is included in deferred charges and other assets if the fair value is an asset or in other accrued liabilities if the fair value is a deficit. The Company recorded other comprehensive (loss) income of ($27,815), $743 and ($2,356) related to the marking-to-market of interest rate swap and cap agreements for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The amount expected to be reclassified to interest expense in the next 12 months is immaterial.
79
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
6. Property:
Property at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land | $ | 1,182,641 | $ | 1,147,464 | |||
Building improvements | 5,223,995 | 4,743,960 | |||||
Tenant improvements | 289,346 | 231,210 | |||||
Equipment and furnishings | 83,199 | 82,456 | |||||
Construction in progress | 442,670 | 294,115 | |||||
7,221,851 | 6,499,205 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (900,360 | ) | (743,922 | ) | |||
$ | 6,321,491 | $ | 5,755,283 | ||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $181,810, $171,015 and $148,116, respectively.
The Company recognized a gain (loss) on the sale of equipment and furnishings of $3,365, ($600) and ($55) during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company recognized a gain on the sale of land of $8,781, $638 and $1,308 during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The above schedule also includes the properties purchased in connection with the acquisition of Wilmorite, Valley River Center, Federated stores, Deptford Mall, Hilton Village and Mervyn's stores classified as held and used at December 31, 2007 (See Note 12--Acquisitions).
7. Marketable Securities:
Marketable Securities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government debt securities, at par value | $ | 30,544 | $ | 31,866 | |||
Less discount | (1,501 | ) | (1,847 | ) | |||
29,043 | 30,019 | ||||||
Unrealized gain | 2,183 | 514 | |||||
Fair value | $ | 31,226 | $ | 30,533 | |||
Future contractual maturities of marketable securities at December 31, 2007 are as follows:
1 year or less | $ | 1,436 | |
2 to 5 years | 3,961 | ||
6 to 10 years | 25,147 | ||
$ | 30,544 | ||
80
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
7. Marketable Securities: (Continued)
The proceeds from maturities and interest receipts from the marketable securities are restricted to the service of the $27,676 note on which the Company remains obligated following the sale of Greeley Mall in July 2006 (See Note 10Bank and Other Notes Payable).
8. Deferred Charges And Other Assets:
Deferred charges and other assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
2007 |
2006 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leasing | $ | 139,343 | $ | 115,657 | ||||
Financing | 47,406 | 40,906 | ||||||
Intangible assets resulting from SFAS No. 141 allocations(1): | ||||||||
In-place lease values | 201,863 | 207,023 | ||||||
Leasing commissions and legal costs | 35,728 | 36,177 | ||||||
424,340 | 399,763 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization(2) | (175,353 | ) | (171,073 | ) | ||||
248,987 | 228,690 | |||||||
Other assets | 137,815 | 79,135 | ||||||
$ | 386,802 | $ | 307,825 | |||||
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 38,741 | |||
2009 | 15,406 | ||||
2010 | 13,048 | ||||
2011 | 10,627 | ||||
2012 | 8,920 | ||||
Thereafter | 48,898 | ||||
$ | 135,640 | ||||
81
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
8. Deferred Charges And Other Assets: (Continued)
The allocated values of above market leases included in other assets and below market leases included in other accrued liabilities, related to SFAS No. 141, consist of the following:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Above Market Leases | |||||||
Original allocated value | $ | 65,752 | $ | 64,718 | |||
Less accumulated amortization | (38,530 | ) | (36,058 | ) | |||
$ | 27,222 | $ | 28,660 | ||||
Below Market Leases |
|||||||
Original allocated value | $ | 156,667 | $ | 150,300 | |||
Less accumulated amortization | (93,090 | ) | (77,261 | ) | |||
$ | 63,577 | $ | 73,039 | ||||
The allocated values of above and below market leases will be amortized into minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the individual remaining lease terms. The estimated amortization of these values for the next five years and subsequent years is as follows:
Year ending December 31, |
Above Market |
Below Market |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 10,841 | $ | 19,420 | ||
2009 | 4,592 | 10,978 | ||||
2010 | 3,475 | 9,450 | ||||
2011 | 2,388 | 7,086 | ||||
2012 | 1,260 | 5,435 | ||||
Thereafter | 4,666 | 11,208 | ||||
$ | 27,222 | $ | 63,577 | |||
82
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
9. Mortgage Notes Payable:
Mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
Carrying Amount of Mortgage Notes(a) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Property Pledged as Collateral |
Interest Rate |
Monthly Payment Term(b) |
Maturity Date |
||||||||||||||||
Other |
Related Party |
Other |
Related Party |
||||||||||||||||
Borgata(c) | $ | | $ | | $ | 14,885 | $ | | 5.39 | % | $ | | | ||||||
Capitola Mall | | 39,310 | | 40,999 | 7.13 | % | 380 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Carmel Plaza | 26,253 | | 26,674 | | 8.18 | % | 202 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Chandler Fashion Center | 169,789 | | 172,904 | | 5.52 | % | 1,043 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Chesterfield Towne Center(d) | 55,702 | | 57,155 | | 9.07 | % | 548 | 2024 | |||||||||||
Danbury Fair Mall | 176,457 | | 182,877 | | 4.64 | % | 1,225 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Deptford Mall(e) | 172,500 | | 100,000 | | 5.41 | % | 778 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Eastview Commons(f) | 8,814 | | 9,117 | | 5.46 | % | 66 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Eastview Mall(f) | 101,007 | | 102,873 | | 5.10 | % | 592 | 2014 | |||||||||||
Fiesta Mall | 84,000 | | 84,000 | | 4.98 | % | 341 | 2015 | |||||||||||
Flagstaff Mall | 37,000 | | 37,000 | | 5.03 | % | 153 | 2015 | |||||||||||
FlatIron Crossing | 187,736 | | 191,046 | | 5.26 | % | 1,102 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Freehold Raceway Mall | 177,686 | | 183,505 | | 4.68 | % | 1,184 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Fresno Fashion Fair | 63,590 | | 64,595 | | 6.52 | % | 437 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Great Northern Mall | 40,285 | | 40,947 | | 5.19 | % | 234 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Greece Ridge Center(g) | 72,000 | | 72,000 | | 5.97 | % | 341 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Hilton Village(h) | 8,530 | | | | 5.27 | % | 37 | 2012 | |||||||||||
La Cumbre Plaza(i) | 30,000 | | 30,000 | | 6.48 | % | 150 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Marketplace Mall(f) | 39,345 | | 40,473 | | 5.30 | % | 267 | 2017 | |||||||||||
Northridge Mall | 81,121 | | 82,514 | | 4.94 | % | 453 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Oaks, The(j) | | | 92,000 | | 6.05 | % | | | |||||||||||
Pacific View | 88,857 | | 90,231 | | 7.23 | % | 649 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Panorama Mall(k) | 50,000 | | 50,000 | | 6.00 | % | 241 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Paradise Valley Mall | 21,231 | | 22,154 | | 5.89 | % | 183 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Paradise Valley Mall(l) | | | 74,990 | | 5.39 | % | | | |||||||||||
Pittsford Plaza(f) | 24,596 | | 25,278 | | 5.02 | % | 159 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Pittsford Plaza(m) | 9,148 | | | | 6.52 | % | 47 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Prescott Gateway | 60,000 | | 60,000 | | 5.86 | % | 289 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Promenade at Casa Grande(n) | 79,964 | | 7,304 | | 6.35 | % | 419 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Queens Center | 90,519 | | 92,039 | | 7.10 | % | 633 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Queens Center | 108,539 | 108,538 | 110,313 | 110,312 | 7.00 | % | 1,501 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Rimrock Mall | 42,828 | | 43,452 | | 7.56 | % | 320 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Salisbury, Center at | 115,000 | | 115,000 | | 5.83 | % | 555 | 2016 | |||||||||||
Santa Monica Place | 79,014 | | 80,073 | | 7.79 | % | 606 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Shoppingtown Mall | 44,645 | | 46,217 | | 5.01 | % | 319 | 2011 | |||||||||||
South Plains Mall | 58,732 | | 59,681 | | 8.29 | % | 454 | 2009 | |||||||||||
South Towne Center | 64,000 | | 64,000 | | 6.66 | % | 353 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Towne Mall | 14,838 | | 15,291 | | 4.99 | % | 100 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Tuscon La Encantada(o) | | 78,000 | 51,000 | | 5.84 | % | 364 | 2012 | |||||||||||
Twenty Ninth Street(p) | 110,558 | | 94,080 | | 5.93 | % | 528 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Valley River Center(q) | 120,000 | | 100,000 | | 5.60 | % | 558 | 2016 | |||||||||||
Valley View Center | 125,000 | | 125,000 | | 5.81 | % | 596 | 2011 | |||||||||||
Victor Valley, Mall of | 51,211 | | 52,429 | | 4.60 | % | 304 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Village Fair North | 10,880 | | 11,210 | | 5.89 | % | 82 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Vintage Faire Mall | 64,386 | | 65,363 | | 7.91 | % | 508 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Westside Pavilion | 92,037 | | 93,513 | | 6.74 | % | 628 | 2008 | |||||||||||
Wilton Mall | 44,624 | | 46,604 | | 4.79 | % | 349 | 2009 | |||||||||||
$ | 3,102,422 | $ | 225,848 | $ | 3,179,787 | $ | 151,311 | ||||||||||||
83
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
9. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
assumed in various acquisitions and are amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt in a manner that approximates the effective interest method. The interest rate disclosed represents the effective interest rate, including the debt premium (discount) and deferred finance cost.
Debt premiums (discounts) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
Property Pledged as Collateral |
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Borgata | $ | | $ | 245 | |||
Danbury Fair Mall | 13,405 | 17,634 | |||||
Eastview Commons | 573 | 776 | |||||
Eastview Mall | 1,736 | 2,018 | |||||
Freehold Raceway Mall | 12,373 | 15,806 | |||||
Great Northern Mall | (164 | ) | (191 | ) | |||
Hilton Village | (70 | ) | | ||||
Marketplace Mall | 1,650 | 1,813 | |||||
Paradise Valley Mall | | 2 | |||||
Paradise Valley Mall | 392 | 685 | |||||
Pittsford Plaza | 857 | 1,025 | |||||
Shoppingtown Mall | 3,731 | 4,813 | |||||
Towne Mall | 464 | 558 | |||||
Victor Valley, Mall of | 54 | 377 | |||||
Village Fair North | 49 | 146 | |||||
Wilton Mall | 2,729 | 4,195 | |||||
$ | 37,779 | $ | 49,902 | ||||
84
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
9. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
Most of the mortgage loan agreements contain a prepayment penalty provision for the early extinguishment of the debt.
Total interest expense capitalized during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $32,004, $14,927 and $9,994, respectively.
Related party mortgage notes payable are amounts due to affiliates of NML. See Note 11Related Party Transactions, for interest expense associated with loans from NML.
The fair value of mortgage notes payable is estimated to be approximately $3,437,032 and $3,854,913, at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, based on current interest rates for comparable loans.
85
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
9. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
The future maturities of mortgage notes payable and bank and other notes payable are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
Mortgage Notes Payable |
Bank and Other Notes Payable |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 417,454 | $ | 639 | $ | 418,093 | |||
2009 | 534,314 | 685 | 534,999 | ||||||
2010 | 226,405 | 1,465,729 | 1,692,134 | ||||||
2011 | 714,826 | 776 | 715,602 | ||||||
2012 | 262,728 | 950,821 | 1,213,549 | ||||||
Thereafter | 1,134,764 | 24,026 | 1,158,790 | ||||||
3,290,491 | 2,442,676 | 5,733,167 | |||||||
Debt premiums (discounts) | 37,779 | (7,988 | ) | 29,791 | |||||
$ | 3,328,270 | $ | 2,434,688 | $ | 5,762,958 | ||||
10. Bank and Other Notes Payable:
Bank and other notes payable consist of the following:
Convertible Senior Notes:
On March 16, 2007, the Company issued $950,000 in convertible senior notes ("Senior Notes") that are to mature on March 15, 2012. The Senior Notes bear interest at 3.25%, payable semiannually, are senior unsecured debt of the Company and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Prior to December 14, 2011, upon the occurrence of certain specified events, the Senior Notes will be convertible at the option of holder into cash, shares of the Company's common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common stock, at the election of the Company, at an initial conversion rate of 8.9702 shares per $1 principal amount. On and after December 15, 2011, the Senior Notes will be convertible at any time prior to the second business day preceding the maturity date at the option of the holder at the initial conversion rate. The initial conversion price of approximately $111.48 per share represented a 20% premium over the closing price of the Company's common stock on March 12, 2007. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Holders of the Senior Notes do not have the right to require the Company to repurchase the Senior Notes prior to maturity except in connection with the occurrence of certain fundamental change transactions. The carrying value of the Senior Notes at December 31, 2007, includes an unamortized discount of $7,988 incurred at issuance and is amortized into interest expense over the term of the Senior Notes in a manner that approximates the effective interest method. As of December 31, 2007, the effective interest rate was 3.66%. The fair value of the Senior Notes is estimated to be approximately $809,305 at December 31, 2007 based on current market price.
In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company purchased two capped calls ("Capped Calls") from affiliates of the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes. The Capped Calls effectively increased the conversion price of the Senior Notes to approximately $130.06, which represents a 40% premium to the March 12, 2007 closing price of $92.90 per common share of the Company. The Capped Calls are expected to generally reduce the potential dilution upon exchange of
86
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
10. Bank and Other Notes Payable: (Continued)
the Senior Notes in the event the market value per share of the Company's common stock, as measured under the terms of the relevant settlement date, is greater than the strike price of the Capped Calls. If, however, the market value per share of the Company's common stock exceeds $130.06 per common share, then the dilution mitigation under the Capped Calls will be capped, which means there would be dilution from exchange of the Senior Notes to the extent that the market value per share of the Company's common stock exceeds $130.06. The cost of the Capped Calls was approximately $59,850 and was recorded as a charge to additional paid-in capital.
Line of Credit:
The Company has a $1,500,000 revolving line of credit that matures on April 25, 2010 with a one-year extension option. The interest rate fluctuates from LIBOR plus 0.75% to LIBOR plus 1.10% depending on the Company's overall leverage. The Company has an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate on $400,000 of the outstanding balance of the line of credit at 6.23% until April 25, 2011. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, borrowings outstanding were $1,015,000 and $934,500 at an average interest rate, excluding the $400,000 swapped portion, of 6.19% and 6.60%, respectively.
Term Notes:
On May 13, 2003, the Company issued $250,000 in unsecured notes that were to mature in May 2007 with a one-year extension option and bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.50%. These notes were repaid in full on March 16, 2007, from the proceeds of the Senior Notes offering. At December 31, 2006, all of the notes were outstanding at an interest rate of 6.94%.
On April 25, 2005, the Company obtained a five-year, $450,000 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. In November 2005, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate of the term loan at 6.30% from December 1, 2005 to April 25, 2010. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the entire term loan was outstanding with an effective interest rate of 6.50%.
On July 27, 2006, concurrent with the sale of Greeley Mall (See Note 13Discontinued Operations), the Company provided marketable securities to replace Greeley Mall as collateral for the mortgage note payable on the property (See Note 7Marketable Securities). As a result of this transaction, the debt was reclassified to bank and other notes payable. This note bears interest at an effective rate of 6.34% and matures in September 2013. As of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the note had a balance outstanding of $27,676 and $28,281, respectively. The fair value is estimated to be $29,730 and $29,288 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, based on current interest rates on comparable loans.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company was in compliance with all applicable loan covenants.
87
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
11. Related-Party Transactions:
Certain unconsolidated joint ventures have engaged the Management Companies to manage the operations of the Centers. Under these arrangements, the Management Companies are reimbursed for compensation paid to on-site employees, leasing agents and project managers at the Centers, as well as insurance costs and other administrative expenses. The following are fees charged to unconsolidated joint ventures for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management Fees | |||||||||
MMC | $ | 10,727 | $ | 10,520 | $ | 11,096 | |||
Westcor Management Companies | 7,088 | 6,812 | 6,163 | ||||||
Wilmorite Management Companies | 1,608 | 1,551 | 747 | ||||||
$ | 19,423 | $ | 18,883 | $ | 18,006 | ||||
Development and Leasing Fees | |||||||||
MMC | $ | 535 | $ | 704 | $ | 1,866 | |||
Westcor Management Companies | 9,995 | 5,136 | 2,295 | ||||||
Wilmorite Management Companies | 1,364 | 79 | 772 | ||||||
$ | 11,894 | $ | 5,919 | $ | 4,933 | ||||
Certain mortgage notes on the properties are held by NML (See Note 9Mortgage Notes Payable). Interest expense in connection with these notes was $13,390, $10,860 and $9,638 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses is interest payable to these partners of $1,150 and $793 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had loans to unconsolidated joint ventures of $604 and $708, respectively. Interest income associated with these notes was $46, $734 and $452 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These loans represent initial funds advanced to development stage projects prior to construction loan funding. Correspondingly, loan payables in the same amount have been accrued as an obligation by the various joint ventures.
Due from affiliates of $5,729 and $4,282 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, represents unreimbursed costs and fees due from unconsolidated joint ventures under management agreements.
Certain Company officers and affiliates have guaranteed mortgages of $21,750 at one of the Company's joint venture properties.
12. Acquisitions:
The Company has completed the following acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
Wilmorite:
On April 25, 2005, the Company and the Operating Partnership acquired Wilmorite Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Wilmorite") and Wilmorite Holdings, L.P., a Delaware
88
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
12. Acquisitions: (Continued)
limited partnership ("Wilmorite Holdings"). The results of Wilmorite and Wilmorite Holding's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since that date. Wilmorite's portfolio included interests in 11 regional malls and two open-air community shopping centers with 13.4 million square feet of space located in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Kentucky and Virginia.
The total purchase price was approximately $2,333,333, plus adjustments for working capital, including the assumption of approximately $877,174 of existing debt with an average interest rate of 6.43% and the issuance of 3,426,609 participating convertible preferred units ("PCPUs") valued at $212,668, 344,625 non-participating convertible preferred units valued at $21,501 and 93,209 common units in Wilmorite Holdings valued at $5,815. The balance of the consideration to the equity holders of Wilmorite and Wilmorite Holdings was paid in cash, which was provided primarily by a five-year, $450,000 term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% and a $650,000 acquisition loan which had a term of up to two years and bore interest initially at LIBOR plus 1.60%. In January 2006, the acquisition loan was paid off in full. An affiliate of the Operating Partnership is the general partner, and together with other affiliates, as of December 31, 2007 owned approximately 83% of Wilmorite Holdings, with the remaining 17% held by those limited partners of Wilmorite Holdings who elected to receive convertible preferred units or common units in Wilmorite Holdings rather than cash. The PCPUs were redeemed on January 1, 2008, for the portion of the Wilmorite portfolio that consists of Eastview Mall, Eastview Commons, Greece Ridge Center, Marketplace Mall and Pittsford Plaza, collectively referred to as the "Rochester Properties" (See Note 25--Subsequent Events).
On an unaudited pro forma basis, reflecting the acquisition of Wilmorite as if it had occurred on January 1, 2005, the Company would have reflected net income available to common stockholders of $41,962, net income available to common stockholders on a diluted per share basis of $0.71 and total consolidated revenues of $832,152 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Assets: | ||||
Property | $ | 1,798,487 | ||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | 443,681 | |||
Other assets | 225,275 | |||
Total assets | 2,467,443 | |||
Liabilities: | ||||
Mortgage notes payable | 809,542 | |||
Other liabilities | 130,191 | |||
Minority interest | 96,196 | |||
Total liabilities | 1,035,929 | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 1,431,514 | ||
89
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
12. Acquisitions: (Continued)
Valley River:
On February 1, 2006, the Company acquired Valley River Center, a 910,841 square foot super-regional mall in Eugene, Oregon. The total purchase price was $187,500 and concurrent with the acquisition, the Company placed a $100,000 loan on the property. The balance of the purchase price was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. The results of Valley River Center's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.
Federated:
On July 26, 2006, the Company purchased 11 department stores located in 10 of its Centers from Federated Department Stores, Inc. for approximately $100,000. The Company's share of the purchase price of $81,043 was funded in part from the proceeds of sales of properties and from borrowings under the line of credit. The balance of the purchase price was paid by the Company's joint venture partners where four of the eleven stores were located. The purchase price allocation included in the Company's balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 was based on information available at that time. Subsequent adjustment to the allocation was made in 2007.
Deptford:
On December 1, 2006, the Company acquired the Deptford Mall, a 1,033,224 square foot super-regional mall in Deptford, New Jersey. The total purchase price was $240,055. The purchase price was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. Subsequently, the Company placed a $100,000 loan on the property. The proceeds from the loan were used to pay down the Company's line of credit. The results of Deptford Mall's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. The purchase price allocation included in the Company's balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 was based on information available at that time. Subsequent adjustment to the allocation was made in 2007.
Hilton Village:
On September 5, 2007, the Company purchased the remaining 50% outside ownership interest in Hilton Village, a 96,546 square foot specialty center in Scottsdale, Arizona. The total purchase price of $13,500 was funded by cash, borrowings under the Company's line of credit and the assumption of a mortgage note payable. The Center was previously accounted for under the equity method as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. The results of Hilton Village's operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. The purchase price allocation included in the Company's balance sheet date at December 31, 2007 was based on information available at that time. Subsequent allocations may be made in 2008.
Mervyn's:
On December 17, 2007, the Company purchased a portfolio of ground leasehold and/or fee simple interests in 39 Mervyn's department stores located in the Southwest United States for $400,160. The purchase price was funded by cash and borrowings under the Company's line of credit. Concurrent with
90
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
12. Acquisitions: (Continued)
the acquisition, the Company entered into 39 individual agreements to leaseback the properties to Mervyn's for terms of 14 to 20 years. The purchase price allocation included in the Company's balance sheet date at December 31, 2007 was based on information available at that time. Subsequent allocations may be made in 2008. At acquisition, management identified 27 properties in the portfolio as available for sale. These properties are located at shopping centers not owned or managed by the Company. The results of operations from these properties have been included in income from discontinued operations since the acquisition date (See Note 13--Discontinued Operations). The results of operations of the 12 Mervyn's properties not designated as assets held for sale have been included in continuing operations of the Company's consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.
13. Discontinued Operations:
The following dispositions occurred during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
On January 5, 2005, the Company sold Arizona Lifestyle Galleries for $4,300. The sale of this property resulted in a gain on sale of asset of $297.
On June 9, 2006, the Company sold Scottsdale/101 for $117,600 resulting in a gain on sale of asset of $62,633. The Company's share of the gain was $25,802. The Company's pro rata share of the proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit.
On July 13, 2006, the Company sold Park Lane Mall for $20,000 resulting in a gain on sale of asset of $5,853.
On July 27, 2006, the Company sold Holiday Village and Greeley Mall in a combined sale for $86,800, resulting in a gain on sale of asset of $28,711. Concurrent with the sale, the Company defeased the mortgage note payable on Greeley Mall. As a result of the defeasance, the lender's secured interest in the property was replaced with a secured interest in marketable securities (See Note 7--Marketable Securities). This transaction did not meet the criteria for extinguishment of debt under SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities."
On August 11, 2006, the Company sold Great Falls Marketplace for $27,500 resulting in a gain on sale of asset of $11,826.
The proceeds from the sale of Park Lane, Holiday Village, Greeley Mall and Great Falls Marketplace were used in part to fund the Company's pro rata share of the purchase price of the Federated stores acquisition (See Note 12--Acquisitions) and pay down the line of credit.
On December 29, 2006, the Company sold Citadel Mall, Northwest Arkansas Mall and Crossroads Mall in a combined sale for $373,800, resulting in a gain of $132,671. The proceeds were used to pay down the Company's line of credit and pay off the mortgage note payable on Paradise Valley Mall (See Note 9--Mortgage Notes Payable).
The carrying value of the properties sold in 2006 at December 31, 2005 was $168,475.
On December 17, 2007, the Company purchased a portfolio of fee simple and/or ground leasehold interests in 39 freestanding Mervyn's department stores located in the Southwest United States for $400,160. (See Note 12Acquisitions). Upon closing of the acquisition, management designated the
91
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
13. Discontinued Operations: (Continued)
27 stores located at shopping centers not owned or managed by the Company in the portfolio as available for sale. The results of operations from these properties have been included in income from discontinued operations since the acquisition date. The carrying value of these properties at December 31, 2007 was $250,648, and has been recorded as assets held for sale.
The Company has classified the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 for all of the above dispositions as discontinued operations.
Loss on sale of assets from discontinued operations of $2,409 in 2007 consisted of additional costs related to properties sold in 2006.
Revenues and income were as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues: | |||||||||||
Scottsdale/101 | $ | 56 | $ | 4,668 | $ | 9,777 | |||||
Park Lane Mall | 13 | 1,510 | 3,091 | ||||||||
Holiday Village | 175 | 2,900 | 5,156 | ||||||||
Greeley Mall | (8 | ) | 4,344 | 7,046 | |||||||
Great Falls Marketplace | -- | 1,773 | 2,680 | ||||||||
Citadel Mall | 45 | 15,729 | 15,278 | ||||||||
Northwest Arkansas Mall | 29 | 12,918 | 12,584 | ||||||||
Crossroads Mall | (28 | ) | 11,479 | 10,923 | |||||||
Mervyn's | 1,224 | -- | -- | ||||||||
$ | 1,506 | $ | 55,321 | $ | 66,535 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||
Arizona Lifestyle Galleries | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | (4 | ) | ||||
Scottsdale/101 | 14 | 344 | (206 | ) | |||||||
Park Lane Mall | (31 | ) | 44 | 839 | |||||||
Holiday Village | 157 | 1,179 | 2,753 | ||||||||
Greeley Mall | (84 | ) | 574 | 873 | |||||||
Great Falls Marketplace | (2 | ) | 1,136 | 1,668 | |||||||
Citadel Mall | (81 | ) | 2,546 | 1,831 | |||||||
Northwest Arkansas Mall | 16 | 3,429 | 2,903 | ||||||||
Crossroads Mall | 18 | 2,124 | 3,250 | ||||||||
Mervyn's | 797 | -- | -- | ||||||||
$ | 804 | $ | 11,376 | $ | 13,907 | ||||||
92
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
14. Future Rental Revenues:
Under existing non-cancelable operating lease agreements, tenants are committed to pay the following minimum rental payments to the Company:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 452,391 | |
2009 | 408,411 | ||
2010 | 374,993 | ||
2011 | 332,264 | ||
2012 | 279,389 | ||
Thereafter | 1,356,462 | ||
$ | 3,203,910 | ||
15. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company has certain properties subject to non-cancelable operating ground leases. The leases expire at various times through 2097, subject in some cases to options to extend the terms of the lease. Certain leases provide for contingent rent payments based on a percentage of base rental income, as defined in the lease. Ground rent expenses were $4,047, $4,235 and $3,860 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No contingent rent was incurred for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Minimum future rental payments required under the leases are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 14,771 | |
2009 | 14,798 | ||
2010 | 14,826 | ||
2011 | 14,850 | ||
2012 | 14,400 | ||
Thereafter | 596,393 | ||
$ | 670,038 | ||
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company was contingently liable for $6,361 and $6,087, respectively, in letters of credit guaranteeing performance by the Company of certain obligations relating to the Centers. The Company does not believe that these letters of credit will result in a liability to the Company. In addition, the Company has a $24,000 letter of credit that serves as collateral to a liability assumed in the acquisition of Wilmorite (See Note 12--Acquisitions).
The Company has entered into a number of construction agreements related to its redevelopment and development activities. Obligations under these agreements are contingent upon the completion of the services within the guidelines specified in the agreement. At December 31, 2007, the Company had $103,419 in outstanding obligations, which it believes will be settled in 2008.
93
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans:
The Company has established share-based compensation plans for the purpose of attracting and retaining executive officers, directors and key employees. In addition, the Company has established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") to allow employees to purchase the Company's common stock at a discount.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," to account for its share-based compensation plans using the modified-prospective method. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under SFAS No. 123(R), an equity instrument is not recorded to common stockholders' equity until the related compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period of the award. The Company records compensation expense on a straight-line basis for awards, with the exception of the market-indexed awards granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP").
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and in accordance with the previous accounting guidance, the Company recognized compensation expense and an increase to additional paid in capital for the fair value of vested stock awards and stock options. In addition, the Company recognized compensation expense and a corresponding liability for the fair value of vested stock units issued under the Eligible Directors' Deferred Compensation/Phantom Stock Plan ("Directors' Phantom Stock Plan").
In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company determined that $6,000 included in other accrued liabilities at December 31, 2005, in connection with the Directors' Phantom Stock Plan, should be included in additional paid-in capital. Additionally, the Company reclassified $15,464 from the Unamortized Restricted Stock line item within equity to additional paid-in capital. The Company made these reclassifications during the year ended December 31, 2006.
The following summarizes the compensation cost under the share and unit-based plans:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTIP units | $ | 8,389 | $ | 685 | $ | -- | |||
Stock awards | 12,385 | 14,190 | 11,528 | ||||||
Stock options | 194 | -- | -- | ||||||
Phantom stock units | 595 | 534 | 1,128 | ||||||
$ | 21,563 | $ | 15,409 | $ | 12,656 | ||||
2003 Equity Incentive Plan:
The 2003 Equity Incentive Plan ("2003 Plan") authorizes the grant of stock awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock units, stock bonuses, performance based awards, dividend equivalent rights and operating partnership units or other convertible or exchangeable units. As of December 31, 2007, only stock awards, LTIP Units (as defined below), operating partnership units and stock options have been granted under the 2003 Plan. All stock options or other rights to acquire common stock granted under the 2003 Plan have a term of 10 years or less. These awards were generally granted based on certain performance criteria for the Company and the employees. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2003 Plan is 6,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2007, there were 4,827,349 shares available for issuance under the 2003 Plan.
94
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
The following stock awards, LTIP Units, operating partnership units and stock options have been granted under the 2003 Plan:
Stock Awards:
The outstanding stock awards vest over three years and the compensation cost related to the grants are determined by the market value at the grant date and are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Stock awards are subject to restrictions determined by the Company's compensation committee. As of December 31, 2007, there was $16,289 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.
On October 31, 2006, as part of a separation agreement with a former executive, the Company accelerated the vesting of 34,829 shares of stock awards. As a result of the accelerated vesting, the Company recognized an additional $610 in compensation cost.
The following table summarizes the activity of non-vested stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2007 2006 and 2005:
|
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at January 1, 2005 | 511,146 | $ | 38.38 | |||
Granted | 260,898 | $ | 53.28 | |||
Vested | (247,371 | ) | $ | 36.35 | ||
Forfeited | (1,019 | ) | $ | 50.47 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 523,654 | $ | 47.07 | |||
Granted | 185,976 | $ | 73.93 | |||
Vested | (314,733 | ) | $ | 44.95 | ||
Forfeited | (2,603 | ) | $ | 64.24 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 392,294 | $ | 61.06 | |||
Granted | 150,057 | $ | 92.36 | |||
Vested | (201,311 | ) | $ | 56.89 | ||
Forfeited | (4,968 | ) | $ | 76.25 | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 336,072 | $ | 77.21 | |||
The fair value of stock awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $11,453, $23,302 and $13,267, respectively.
LTIP Units:
On October 26, 2006, The Macerich Company 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2006 LTIP"), a long-term incentive compensation program, was approved pursuant to the 2003 Plan. Under the 2006 LTIP, each award recipient is issued a new form of operating partnership units ("LTIP Units") in the Operating Partnership. Upon the occurrence of specified events and subject to the satisfaction of applicable vesting conditions, LTIP Units are ultimately redeemable for common stock, or cash at the
95
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
Company's option, on a one-unit for one-share basis. LTIP Units receive cash dividends based on the dividend amount paid on the common stock. The 2006 LTIP provides for both market-indexed awards and service-based awards.
The market-indexed LTIP Units vest over the service period based on the percentile ranking of the Company in terms of total return to stockholders (the "Total Return") per common stock share relative to the Total Return of a group of peer REITs, as measured at the end of each year of the measurement period; whereas the service-based LTIP Units vest straight-line over the service period. The compensation cost is recognized under the graded attribution method for market-indexed LTIP awards and the straight-line method for the serviced based LTIP awards.
The fair value of the market-based LTIP Units is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo Simulation model. The stock price of the Company, along with the stock prices of the group of peer REITs (for market-indexed awards), is assumed to follow the Multivariate Geometric Brownian Motion Process. Multivariate Geometric Brownian Motion is a common assumption when modeling in financial markets, as it allows the modeled quantity (in this case, the stock price) to vary randomly from its current value and take any value greater than zero. The volatilities of the returns on the price of the Company and the peer group REITs were estimated based on a three year look-back period. The expected growth rate of the stock prices over the "derived service period" is determined with consideration of the risk free rate as of the grant date.
The following table summarizes the activity of non-vested LTIP Units during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
Number of Units |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at January 1, 2006 | -- | |||||
Granted | 215,709 | $ | 52.18 | |||
Vested | -- | $ | -- | |||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 215,709 | $ | 52.18 | |||
Granted | 57,258 | $ | 64.35 | |||
Vested | (85,580 | ) | $ | 52.18 | ||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 187,387 | $ | 55.90 | |||
The total unrecognized compensation cost of LTIP Units at December 31, 2007 was $5,866.
Stock Options:
On October 8, 2003, the Company granted 2,500 stock options to a Director at a weighted average exercise price of $39.43. These outstanding stock options vested six months after the grant date and were issued with a strike price equal to the fair value of the common stock at the grant date. The term of these stock options is ten years from the grant date.
96
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
On September 4, 2007, the Company granted 100,000 stock options to an officer with a weighted average exercise price of $82.14 per share and a ten-year term. Options vest 331/3% on each of the three subsequent anniversaries of the date of the grant and are generally contingent upon the officer's continued employment with the Company. The Company has estimated the fair value of the stock option award at $17.87 per share using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model based upon the following assumptions: volatility of 22.83%, dividend yield of 3.46%, risk free rate of 4.56%, a current value $82.14 and an expected term of eight years. The assumptions for volatility and dividend yield were based on the Company's historical experience as a publicly traded company, the current value was based on the closing price on the date of grant, and the risk free rate was based upon the interest rate of the 10-year treasury bond on the date of grant.
The Company recognizes compensation cost using the straight-line method over the three-year vesting period.
The following table summarizes the activity of stock options:
|
Number of Options |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at January 1, 2005 | 2,500 | $ | 39.43 | |||
Granted | -- | $ | -- | |||
Exercised | -- | $ | -- | |||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 2,500 | $ | 39.43 | |||
Granted | -- | $ | -- | |||
Exercised | -- | $ | -- | |||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 2,500 | $ | 39.43 | |||
Granted | 100,000 | $ | 82.14 | |||
Exercised | -- | $ | -- | |||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 102,500 | $ | 81.10 | |||
97
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
Directors' Phantom Stock Plan:
The Directors' Phantom Stock Plan offers non-employee members of the board of directors ("Directors") the opportunity to defer their cash compensation and to receive that compensation in common stock rather than in cash after termination of service or a predetermined period. Compensation generally includes the annual retainer and regular meeting fees payable by the Company to the Directors. Every Director has elected to receive their compensation in common stock. Deferred amounts are credited as units of phantom stock at the beginning of each three-year deferral period by dividing the present value of the deferred compensation by the average fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of award. Compensation expense related to the phantom stock award was determined by the amortization of the value of the stock units on a straight-line basis over the applicable three-year service period. The stock units (including dividend equivalents) vest as the Directors' services (to which the fees relate) are rendered. Vested phantom stock units are ultimately paid out in common stock on a one-unit for one-share basis. Stock units receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional stock units, based on the dividend amount paid on the common stock. The aggregate number of phantom stock units that may be granted under the Directors' Phantom Stock Plan is 250,000. As of December 31, 2007, there were 117,263 units available for grant under the Directors' Phantom Stock Plan. As of December 31, 2007, there was $538 of unrecognized cost related to non-vested phantom stock units, which will vest over the next two years.
The following table summarizes the activity of the non-vested phantom stock units:
|
Number of Units |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at January 1, 2005 | 11,717 | $ | 38.38 | |||
Granted | 3,957 | $ | 53.28 | |||
Vested | (9,816 | ) | $ | 51.86 | ||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 5,858 | $ | 43.70 | |||
Granted | 3,707 | $ | 74.90 | |||
Vested | (9,565 | ) | $ | 55.79 | ||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | -- | $ | -- | |||
Granted | 13,491 | $ | 84.03 | |||
Vested | (7,072 | ) | $ | 84.19 | ||
Forfeited | -- | $ | -- | |||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 6,419 | $ | 83.86 | |||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
The ESPP authorizes eligible employees to purchase the Company's common stock through voluntary payroll deduction made during periodic offering periods. Under the plan, common stock is purchased at a 10% discount from the lesser of the fair value of common stock at the beginning and
98
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
16. Share and Unit-Based Plans: (Continued)
ending of the offering period. A maximum of 750,000 shares of common stock is available for purchase under the ESPP. The number of shares available for future purchase under the plan at December 31, 2007 was 719,637.
Other Share-Based Plans:
Prior to the adoption of the 2003 Plan, the Company had several other share-based plans. Under these plans, 404,322 stock options were outstanding as of December 31, 2007. No additional shares may be issued under these plans. All stock options outstanding under these plans were fully vested as of December 31, 2005 and were, therefore, not impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). As of December 31, 2007, all of the outstanding shares are exercisable at a weighted average price of $23.81. The weighted average remaining contractual life for options outstanding and exercisable was three years.
17. Profit Sharing Plan:
The Company has a retirement profit sharing plan that covers substantially all of its eligible employees. The plan is qualified in accordance with section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Effective January 1, 1995, this plan was modified to include a 401(k) plan whereby employees can elect to defer compensation subject to Internal Revenue Service withholding rules. This plan was further amended effective February 1, 1999, to add The Macerich Company Common Stock Fund as a new investment alternative under the plan. A total of 150,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the plan. Contributions by the Company to the plan were made at the discretion of the Board of Directors and were based upon a specified percentage of employee compensation. The Company contributed $1,694 during the year ended December 31, 2004. On January 1, 2004, the plan adopted the "Safe Harbor" provision under Sections 401(k)(12) and 401(m)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code. In accordance with these newly adopted provisions, the Company began matching contributions equal to 100 percent of the first three percent of compensation deferred by a participant and 50 percent of the next two percent of compensation deferred by a participant. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, these matching contributions made by the Company were $2,680, $1,747 and $1,984, respectively. Contributions are recognized as compensation in the period they are made.
18. Deferred Compensation Plans:
The Company has established deferred compensation plans under which key executives of the Company may elect to defer receiving a portion of their cash compensation otherwise payable in one calendar year until a later year. The Company may, as determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion, credit a participant's account with an amount equal to a percentage of the participant's deferral. The Company contributed $815, $712 and $595 to the plans during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Contributions are recognized as compensation in the periods they are made.
99
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Income Taxes:
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. It is management's current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company's REIT status. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on net income it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, then it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income, if any.
Each partner is taxed individually on its share of partnership income or loss, and accordingly, no provision for federal and state income tax is provided for the Operating Partnership in the consolidated financial statements.
The following table reconciles net income available to common stockholders to taxable income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 71,661 | $ | 228,022 | $ | 52,588 | ||||||
Add: book depreciation and amortization available to common stockholders | 243,471 | 261,065 | 197,861 | |||||||||
Less: tax depreciation and amortization available to common stockholders | (196,134 | ) | (203,961 | ) | (161,108 | ) | ||||||
Book/tax difference on gain on divestiture of real estate | 4,540 | (82,502 | ) | 253 | ||||||||
Book/tax difference related to SFAS No. 141 purchase price allocation and market value debt adjustment (excluding SFAS 141 depreciation and amortization) | (8,326 | ) | (6,403 | ) | (16,962 | ) | ||||||
Other book/tax differences, net(1) | (8,238 | ) | (7,675 | ) | 5,798 | |||||||
Taxable income available to common stockholders | $ | 106,974 | $ | 188,546 | $ | 78,430 | ||||||
For income tax purposes, distributions paid to common stockholders consist of ordinary income, capital gains, unrecaptured Section 1250 gain and return of capital or a combination thereof. The
100
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Income Taxes: (Continued)
following table details the components of the distributions, on a per share basis, for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ordinary income | $ | 1.52 | 51.9 | % | $ | 1.14 | 41.4 | % | $ | 1.41 | 53.6 | % | ||||
Qualified dividends | -- | 0.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | 0.07 | 2.7 | % | |||||||
Capital gains | 0.08 | 2.6 | % | 0.93 | 33.8 | % | 0.03 | 1.1 | % | |||||||
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain | -- | 0.0 | % | 0.66 | 24.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Return of capital | 1.33 | 45.5 | % | 0.02 | 0.8 | % | 1.12 | 42.6 | % | |||||||
Dividends paid | $ | 2.93 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2.75 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2.63 | 100.0 | % | ||||
The Company has made Taxable REIT Subsidiary elections for all of its corporate subsidiaries other than its Qualified REIT Subsidiaries. The elections, effective for the year beginning January 1, 2001 and future years were made pursuant to section 856(l) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company's TRSs are subject to corporate level income taxes which are provided for in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company's primary TRSs include Macerich Management Company and Westcor Partners, LLC.
The income tax benefit (provision) of the TRSs for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (1,171 | ) | |
Deferred | 478 | 2 | 3,202 | |||||||
Total income tax benefit (provision) | $ | 470 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 2,031 | |||
Income tax benefit (provision) of the TRSs for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are reconciled to the amount computed by applying the Federal Corporate tax rate as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book income (loss) for Taxable REIT Subsidiaries | $ | (3,812 | ) | $ | 466 | $ | (3,729 | ) | ||
Tax benefit (provision) at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 1,296 | $ | (158 | ) | $ | 1,267 | |||
Other | (826 | ) | 125 | 764 | ||||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | $ | 470 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 2,031 | |||
SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The deferred tax assets and liabilities of the TRSs relate primarily to differences in the book and tax bases of property and to operating loss carryforwards for
101
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Income Taxes: (Continued)
federal and state income tax purposes. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if the Company believes it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the TRSs generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. The net operating loss carryforwards are currently scheduled to expire through 2027, beginning in 2017.
The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards of the TRSs included in the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 14,875 | $ | 14,797 | |||
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and treatment of certain other costs | (4,005 | ) | (5,095 | ) | |||
Other | 1,210 | 1,525 | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 12,080 | $ | 11,227 | |||
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had $1,574 of unrecognized tax benefit, all of which would affect the Company's effective tax rate if recognized, and which was recorded as a charge to additional paid-in capital.
The following is a reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2007:
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 | $ | 1,574 | ||
Gross increases for tax positions of current year | 607 | |||
Gross decreases for lapse of statute of limitations | (275 | ) | ||
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 | $ | 1,906 | ||
The tax years 2004-2006 remain open to examination by the taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. The Company does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit will materially change within the next 12 months.
20. Stock Offering:
On January 19, 2006, the Company issued 10,952,381 common shares for net proceeds of $746,485. The proceeds from issuance of the shares were used to pay off the $619,000 acquisition loan and to pay down a portion of the Company's line of credit pending use to pay part of the purchase price for Valley River Center (See Note 12--Acquisitions).
102
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
21. Stock Repurchase Program:
On March 16, 2007, the Company repurchased 807,000 shares for $74,970 concurrent with the Senior Notes offering (See Note 10--Bank and Other Notes Payable). These shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company's stock repurchase program authorized by the Company's Board of Directors on March 9, 2007. This repurchase program ended on March 16, 2007 because the maximum shares allowed to be repurchased under the program was reached.
22. Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock:
On February 25, 1998, the Company issued 3,627,131 shares of Series A cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") for proceeds totaling $100,000 in a private placement. The preferred stock can be converted on a one for one basis into common stock and will pay a quarterly dividend equal to the greater of $0.46 per share, or the dividend then payable on a share of common stock.
No dividends will be declared or paid on any class of common or other junior stock to the extent that dividends on Series A Preferred Stock have not been declared and/or paid.
The holders of Series A Preferred Stock have redemption rights if a change in control of the Company occurs, as defined under the Articles Supplementary. Under such circumstances, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to require the Company to redeem their shares, to the extent the Company has funds legally available therefor, at a price equal to 105% of its liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock holder also has the right to require the Company to repurchase its shares if the Company fails to be taxed as a REIT for federal tax purposes at a price equal to 115% of its liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends, to the extent funds are legally available therefor.
On October 18, 2007, the holder of Series A Preferred Stock converted 560,000 shares to common shares.
The total liquidation preference as of December 31, 2007 is $84,561.
23. Segment Information:
SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," established standards for disclosure about operating segments and related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company currently operates in one business segment, the acquisition, ownership, development, redevelopment, management and leasing of regional and community shopping centers. Additionally, the Company operates in one geographic area, the United States.
103
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
24. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):
The following is a summary of quarterly results of operations for 2007 and 2006:
|
2007 Quarter Ended |
2006 Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec 31 |
Sep 30 |
Jun 30 |
Mar 31 |
Dec 31 |
Sep 30 |
Jun 30 |
Mar 31 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 244,925 | $ | 223,984 | $ | 215,788 | $ | 211,671 | $ | 233,806 | $ | 202,077 | $ | 193,091 | $ | 200,682 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 38,367 | $ | 17,280 | $ | 13,448 | $ | 2,566 | $ | 147,929 | $ | 46,968 | $ | 25,672 | $ | 7,453 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders per share-basic | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders per share-diluted | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 1.98 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.11 |
25. Subsequent Events:
On February 9, 2008, the Company declared a dividend/distribution of $0.80 per share for common stockholders and OP Unit holders of record on February 22, 2008. In addition, the Company declared a dividend of $0.80 on the Company's Series A Preferred Stock. On February 9, 2008, MACWH, LP declared a distribution of $1.06 per unit for its non-participating convertible preferred unit holders and $0.80 per unit for its common unit holders of record on February 22, 2008. All dividends/distributions will be payable on March 7, 2008.
On January 1, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company, at the election of the holders, redeemed approximately 3.4 million PCPUs in exchange for the Rochester Properties. (See Note 12Acquisitions)
On January 10, 2008, the Company in a 50/50 joint venture with the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation acquired the Shops at North Bridge, a 547,300 square foot urban shopping center in Chicago, Illinois, for a total purchase price of $515,000. The Company's share of the purchase price was funded by the assumption of a pro rata share of the $205,000 fixed rate mortgage on the Center and by borrowings under the Company's line of credit.
104
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS
To
the Board of Trustees and Stockholders of
Pacific Premier Retail Trust
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Premier Retail Trust, a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust") as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(4), as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. These financial statements and the financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board and in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, based on our audits such financial statement schedules when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2008
105
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
Property, net | $ | 978,979 | $ | 987,820 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 17,078 | 8,939 | |||||||
Restricted cash | 1,485 | 1,319 | |||||||
Tenant receivables, net | 8,119 | 6,684 | |||||||
Deferred rent receivable | 9,792 | 9,999 | |||||||
Deferred charges, net | 10,021 | 10,243 | |||||||
Other assets | 1,499 | 2,128 | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,026,973 | $ | 1,027,132 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|||||||||
Mortgage notes payable: | |||||||||
Related parties | $ | 66,059 | $ | 70,146 | |||||
Others | 753,180 | 760,736 | |||||||
Total | 819,239 | 830,882 | |||||||
Accounts payable | 1,943 | 1,262 | |||||||
Accrued interest payable | 3,942 | 4,014 | |||||||
Tenant security deposits | 2,245 | 2,047 | |||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 14,247 | 9,093 | |||||||
Due to related parties | 1,200 | 772 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 842,816 | 848,070 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | |||||||||
Series A and Series B redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value, 625 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006 | -- | -- | |||||||
Series A and Series B common stock, $.01 par value, 219,611 shares authorized issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 320,555 | 307,613 | |||||||
Accumulated deficit | (136,400 | ) | (128,553 | ) | |||||
Total common stockholders' equity | 184,157 | 179,062 | |||||||
Total liabilities, preferred stock and common stockholders' equity | $ | 1,026,973 | $ | 1,027,132 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
106
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 125,558 | $ | 124,103 | $ | 116,421 | |||||
Percentage rents | 7,409 | 7,611 | 7,171 | ||||||||
Tenant recoveries | 50,435 | 48,739 | 42,455 | ||||||||
Other | 4,237 | 4,166 | 3,852 | ||||||||
187,639 | 184,619 | 169,899 | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||
Maintenance and repairs | 11,210 | 10,484 | 9,921 | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 14,099 | 13,588 | 12,219 | ||||||||
Management fees | 6,474 | 6,382 | 6,005 | ||||||||
General and administrative | 4,568 | 4,993 | 3,498 | ||||||||
Ground rent | 1,456 | 1,425 | 1,811 | ||||||||
Insurance | 2,207 | 1,649 | 1,456 | ||||||||
Marketing | 611 | 648 | 696 | ||||||||
Utilities | 6,708 | 6,903 | 5,857 | ||||||||
Security | 5,238 | 5,184 | 5,074 | ||||||||
Interest | 49,524 | 50,981 | 49,476 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 30,970 | 29,554 | 27,567 | ||||||||
133,065 | 131,791 | 123,580 | |||||||||
Income before minority interest and loss on early extinguishment of debt | 54,574 | 52,828 | 46,319 | ||||||||
Minority interest | (195 | ) | (185 | ) | (145 | ) | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | -- | -- | (13 | ) | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 54,379 | $ | 52,643 | $ | 46,161 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
107
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
Common Shares |
Preferred Shares |
Common Stock Par Value |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance January 1, 2005 | 219,611 | 625 | $ | 2 | $ | 307,613 | $ | 3,905 | $ | 311,520 | |||||||
Distributions paid to Macerich PPR Corp. | -- | -- | -- | -- | (93,830 | ) | (93,830 | ) | |||||||||
Distributions paid to Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board | -- | -- | -- | -- | (90,636 | ) | (90,636 | ) | |||||||||
Other distributions paid | -- | -- | -- | -- | (75 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | 46,161 | 46,161 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2005 | 219,611 | 625 | 2 | 307,613 | (134,475 | ) | 173,140 | ||||||||||
Distributions paid to Macerich PPR Corp. | -- | -- | -- | -- | (23,647 | ) | (23,647 | ) | |||||||||
Distributions paid to Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board | -- | -- | -- | -- | (22,999 | ) | (22,999 | ) | |||||||||
Other distributions paid | -- | -- | -- | -- | (75 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | 52,643 | 52,643 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2006 | 219,611 | 625 | 2 | 307,613 | (128,553 | ) | 179,062 | ||||||||||
Contributions from Macerich PPR Corp. | -- | -- | -- | 6,582 | -- | 6,582 | |||||||||||
Contributions from Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board | -- | -- | -- | 6,360 | -- | 6,360 | |||||||||||
Distributions paid to Macerich PPR Corp. | -- | -- | -- | -- | (31,609 | ) | (31,609 | ) | |||||||||
Distributions paid to Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board | -- | -- | -- | -- | (30,542 | ) | (30,542 | ) | |||||||||
Other distributions paid | -- | -- | -- | -- | (75 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | 54,379 | 54,379 | |||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2007 | 219,611 | 625 | $ | 2 | $ | 320,555 | $ | (136,400 | ) | $ | 184,157 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
108
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 54,379 | $ | 52,643 | $ | 46,161 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 31,458 | 29,554 | 27,567 | ||||||||||
Minority interest | 195 | 185 | 145 | ||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | -- | -- | 13 | ||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Tenant receivables, net | (1,435 | ) | (3,957 | ) | 5,089 | ||||||||
Deferred rent receivable | 207 | (103 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets | 629 | (449 | ) | (123 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable | 681 | (15,926 | ) | 14,377 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable | (72 | ) | (8 | ) | 732 | ||||||||
Tenant security deposits | 198 | 195 | 272 | ||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 4,959 | 1,188 | 96 | ||||||||||
Due to related parties | 428 | (192 | ) | 38 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 91,627 | 63,130 | 94,166 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||
Acquistions of property and improvements | (19,070 | ) | (22,669 | ) | (47,919 | ) | |||||||
Deferred leasing charges | (3,325 | ) | (3,657 | ) | (2,918 | ) | |||||||
Restricted cash | (166 | ) | 452 | 347 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (22,561 | ) | (25,874 | ) | (50,490 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable | -- | 130,000 | 291,000 | ||||||||||
Payments on notes payable | (11,643 | ) | (119,946 | ) | (155,627 | ) | |||||||
Contributions | 12,942 | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Distributions | (61,851 | ) | (46,346 | ) | (184,166 | ) | |||||||
Dividends to preferred stockholders | (375 | ) | (375 | ) | (375 | ) | |||||||
Deferred financing costs | -- | (142 | ) | (842 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (60,927 | ) | (36,809 | ) | (50,010 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 8,139 | 447 | (6,334 | ) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 8,939 | 8,492 | 14,826 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 17,078 | $ | 8,939 | $ | 8,492 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | |||||||||||||
Cash payment for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 49,596 | $ | 50,981 | $ | 48,744 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
109
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation:
On February 18, 1999, Macerich PPR Corp. (the "Corp"), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of The Macerich Company (the "Company"), and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board ("Ontario Teachers") formed the Pacific Premier Retail Trust (the "Trust") to acquire and operate a portfolio of regional shopping centers ("Centers").
Included in the Centers is a 99% interest in Los Cerritos Center and Stonewood Mall, all other Centers are held at 100%.
The Centers as of December 31, 2007 and their locations are as follows:
Cascade Mall | Burlington, Washington | |
Creekside Crossing Mall | Redmond, Washington | |
Cross Court Plaza | Burlington, Washington | |
Kitsap Mall | Silverdale, Washington | |
Kitsap Place Mall | Silverdale, Washington | |
Lakewood Mall | Lakewood, California | |
Los Cerritos Center | Cerritos, California | |
Northpoint Plaza | Silverdale, Washington | |
Redmond Towne Center | Redmond, Washington | |
Redmond Office | Redmond, Washington | |
Stonewood Mall | Downey, California | |
Washington Square Mall | Portland, Oregon | |
Washington Square Too | Portland, Oregon |
The Trust was organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Corp maintains a 51% ownership interest in the Trust, while Ontario Teachers' maintains a 49% ownership interest in the Trust.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The Trust considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents, for which cost approximates fair value.
Tenant Receivables:
Included in tenant receivables are accrued percentage rents of $2,773 and $2,540 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 and $442 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Revenues:
Minimum rental revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease. The difference between the amount of rent due in a year and the amount recorded as rental income is referred to as the "straight-line rent adjustment." Rental income was increased (decreased) by ($28), $104 and $200 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due to the straight-line rent adjustment.
110
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
Percentage rents are recognized on an accrual basis and are accrued when tenants' specified sales targets have been met.
Estimated recoveries from certain tenants for their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance and other shopping center operating expenses are recognized as revenues in the period the applicable expenses are incurred or as specified in the leases. Other tenants pay a fixed rate and these tenant recoveries are recognized into revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases.
Property:
Costs related to the redevelopment, construction and improvement of properties are capitalized. Interest incurred on redevelopment and construction projects is capitalized until construction is substantially complete.
Maintenance and repairs expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Costs for major replacements and betterments, which includes HVAC equipment, roofs, parking lots, etc. are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Gains and losses are recognized upon disposal or retirement of the related assets and are reflected in earnings.
Property is recorded at cost and is depreciated using a straight-line method over the estimated lives of the assets as follows:
Building and improvements | 5-39 years | |
Tenant improvements | 5-7 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5-7 years |
The Trust assesses whether there has been impairment in the value of its long-lived assets by considering expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Such factors include the tenants' ability to perform their duties and pay rent under the terms of the leases. The determination of recoverability is made based upon the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, excluding interest expense. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value, as determined by an undiscounted cash flows analysis, with the carrying value of the related assets. Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Management does not believe impairment has occurred in its net property carrying values at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Deferred Charges:
Costs relating to obtaining tenant leases are deferred and amortized over the initial term of the agreement using the straight-line method. Costs relating to financing of properties are deferred and amortized over the life of the related loan using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The range of terms of the agreements is as follows:
Deferred lease cost | 1-9 years | |
Deferred finance costs | 1-12 years |
111
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
Included in deferred charges are accumulated amortization of $12,167 and $12,209 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Trust calculates the fair value of financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to consolidated financial statements when the fair value is different than the carrying value of those financial instruments. When the fair value reasonably approximates the carrying value, no additional disclosure is made. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Trust using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Trust could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Concentration of Risk:
The Trust maintains its cash accounts in a number of commercial banks. Accounts at these banks are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $100. At various times during the year, the Trust had deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.
One tenant represented 10.1%, 10.6% and 10.7% of total minimum rents in place as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No other tenant represented more than 10% of total minimum rents as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Management Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 (revised), "Share-Based Payment" SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the results of operations.
In March 2005, FASB issued FIN No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations-an interpretation of SFAS No. 143." FIN No. 47 requires that a liability be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value can be reasonably estimated. The adoption of FIN No. 47 did not have a material effect on the Trust's results of operations or financial condition.
112
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments--An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140." This statement amended SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. This statement also established a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the Trust's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition of previously recognized income tax benefits, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Trust adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not have a material effect on the Trust's results of operations or financial condition.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 108. SAB No. 108 establishes a framework for quantifying materiality of financial statement misstatements. The adoption of SAB No. 108 on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Trust's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 ("FSP FAS 157-1"). FSP FAS 157-1 defers the effective date of Statement 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-1 also excludes from the scope of SFAS 157 certain leasing transactions accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The Trust adopted SFAS 157 and FSP FAS 157-1 on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 and FSP FAS 157-1 did not have a material impact on the Trust's results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities--Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS No. 159 permits, at the option of the reporting entity, to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The Trust adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect on the Trust's results of operations or financial condition as the Trust did not elect to apply the fair value option to eligible financial instruments on that date.
113
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised), "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141(R) requires all assets and assumed liabilities, including contingent liabilities, in a business combination to be recorded at their acquisition-date fair value rather than at historical costs. The Trust is required to adopt SFAS No. 141 (R) on January 1, 2009 and does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on the Trust's results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements--an amendment to ARB No. 51". SFAS No. 160 clarifies the accounting for noncontrolling or minority interest in a subsidiary included in consolidated financial statements. The Trust is required to adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on the Trust's results of operations and financial condition.
3. Property:
Property is summarized at December 31, 2007 and 2006 as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land | $ | 238,569 | $ | 238,569 | |||
Building improvements | 871,610 | 867,778 | |||||
Tenant improvements | 29,471 | 24,354 | |||||
Equipment and furnishings | 7,992 | 7,119 | |||||
Construction in progress | 30,133 | 21,596 | |||||
1,177,775 | 1,159,416 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (198,796 | ) | (171,596 | ) | |||
$ | 978,979 | $ | 987,820 | ||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $27,911, $26,603 and $24,802, respectively.
114
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Mortgage Notes Payable:
Mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
|
Carrying Amount of Mortage Notes |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Property Pledged as Collateral |
Other |
Related Party |
Other |
Related Party |
Interest Rate |
Monthly Payment Term(a) |
Maturity Date |
|||||||||||
Cascade Mall | $ | 39,432 | $ | -- | $ | 40,048 | $ | -- | 5.27 | % | 223 | 2010 | ||||||
Kitsap Mall/Kitsap Place(b) | 57,272 | -- | 58,024 | -- | 8.14 | % | 450 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Lakewood Mall | 250,000 | -- | 250,000 | -- | 5.43 | % | 1,127 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Los Cerritos Center(c) | 130,000 | -- | 130,000 | -- | 5.92 | % | 640 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Redmond Town Center--Retail | 72,136 | -- | 73,362 | -- | 4.81 | % | 301 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Redmond Town Center--Office | -- | 66,059 | -- | 70,146 | 6.77 | % | 726 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Stonewood Mall | 73,990 | -- | 74,862 | -- | 7.44 | % | 539 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Washington Square | 97,905 | -- | 101,131 | -- | 6.72 | % | 825 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Washington Square(d) | 32,445 | -- | 33,309 | -- | 7.23 | % | 204 | 2009 | ||||||||||
$ | 753,180 | $ | 66,059 | $ | 760,736 | $ | 70,146 | |||||||||||
Most of the mortgage loan agreements contain a prepayment penalty provision for the early extinguishment of the debt. The related party mortgage note is payable to one of the Company's joint venture partners. See Note 5--Related Party Transactions.
Total interest costs capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1,844, $668 and $942, respectively.
The fair value of mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was estimated to be approximately $834,565 and $839,711, respectively, based on interest rates for comparable loans.
115
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Mortgage Notes Payable: (Continued)
The above debt matures as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 12,384 | |
2009 | 261,120 | ||
2010 | 165,735 | ||
2011 | 130,000 | ||
2012 | -- | ||
Thereafter | 250,000 | ||
$ | 819,239 | ||
5. Related Party Transactions:
The Trust engages the Macerich Management Company (the "Management Company"), a subsidiary of the Company, to manage the operations of the Trust. The Management Company provides property management, leasing, corporate, redevelopment and acquisitions services to the properties of the Trust. Under these arrangements, the Management Company is reimbursed for compensation paid to on-site employees, leasing agents and project managers at the properties, as well as insurance costs and other administrative expenses. In consideration of these services, the Management Company receives monthly management fees of 4.0% of the gross monthly rental revenue of the properties. During the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Trust incurred management fees of $6,474, $6,382 and $6,005, respectively, to the Management Company.
A mortgage note collateralized by the office component of Redmond Town Center is held by one of the Company's joint venture partners. In connection with this note, interest expense was $4,654, $4,875 and $5,125 during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Additionally, no interest costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in relation to this note.
6. Income taxes:
The Trust elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1999. To qualify as a REIT, the Trust must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. It is the Trust's current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Trust's REIT status. As a REIT, the Trust generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on net income it distributes currently to its stockholders. As such, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. If the Trust fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, then it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Trust qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Trust may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income, if any.
116
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
6. Income taxes: (Continued)
The following table reconciles net income to taxable income for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income | $ | 54,379 | $ | 52,643 | $ | 46,161 | ||||||
Add: book depreciation and amortization | 30,970 | 29,554 | 27,567 | |||||||||
Less: tax depreciation and amortization | (29,274 | ) | (28,928 | ) | (26,979 | ) | ||||||
Other book/tax differences, net(1) | (128 | ) | 184 | (1,617 | ) | |||||||
Taxable income | $ | 55,947 | $ | 53,453 | $ | 45,132 | ||||||
For income tax purposes, distributions consist of ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. The following table details the components of the distributions for the years ended December 31:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ordinary income | $ | 258.87 | 100.0 | % | $ | 233.79 | 100.0 | % | $ | 211.03 | 25.2 | % | ||||
Qualified dividends | -- | 0.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Capital gains | -- | 0.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | -- | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Return of capital | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 627.26 | 74.8 | % | |||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | 258.87 | 100.0 | % | $ | 233.79 | 100.0 | % | $ | 838.29 | 100.0 | % | ||||
7. Future Rental Revenues:
Under existing non-cancelable operating lease agreements, tenants are committed to pay the following minimum rental payments to the Trust:
Year Ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 113,887 | |
2009 | 100,189 | ||
2010 | 89,372 | ||
2011 | 78,026 | ||
2012 | 66,263 | ||
Thereafter | 175,129 | ||
$ | 622,866 | ||
8. Redeemable Preferred Stock:
On October 6, 1999, the Trust issued 125 shares of Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest ("Preferred Stock") for proceeds totaling $500 in a private placement. On October 26, 1999, the Trust issued 254 and 246 shares of Preferred Stock to the Corp and Ontario Teachers', respectively. The Preferred Stock can be redeemed by the Trust at any time with 15 days notice for $4,000 per share
117
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
8. Redeemable Preferred Stock: (Continued)
plus accumulated and unpaid dividends and the applicable redemption premium. The Preferred Stock will pay a semiannual dividend equal to $300 per share. The Preferred Stock has limited voting rights.
9. Commitments:
The Trust has certain properties subject to non-cancelable operating ground leases. The leases expire at various times through 2069, subject in some cases to options to extend the terms of the lease. Ground rent expense, net of amounts capitalized, was $1,456, $1,425 and $1,811 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Minimum future rental payments required under the leases are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
Amount |
||
---|---|---|---|
2008 | $ | 1,413 | |
2009 | 1,413 | ||
2010 | 1,413 | ||
2011 | 1,413 | ||
2012 | 1,413 | ||
Thereafter | 63,179 | ||
$ | 70,244 | ||
118
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Partners
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, cash flows, and partners' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also audited the related financial statement schedule (Schedule III). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule (Schedule III), when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 25, 2008
119
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2007 |
2006 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||||
Properties: |
|||||||
Land | $ | 187,462 | 194,312 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 911,756 | 906,343 | |||||
Equipment and furnishings | 6,298 | 5,329 | |||||
1,105,516 | 1,105,984 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 241,591 | 214,090 | |||||
863,925 | 891,894 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
15,851 |
10,951 |
|||||
Tenant receivables, including accrued revenue, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,062 and $1,366 | 20,542 | 17,952 | |||||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $386 and $225 | 1,932 | 2,086 | |||||
Prepaid real estate taxes and other assets | 1,936 | 1,837 | |||||
$ | 904,186 | 924,720 | |||||
Liabilities and Partners' Equity |
|||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
$ |
793,464 |
795,424 |
||||
Accounts payable | 4,463 | 4,182 | |||||
Due to affiliates | 331 | 589 | |||||
Accrued real estate taxes | 16,695 | 16,752 | |||||
Accrued interest expense | 3,730 | 2,290 | |||||
Accrued management fee | 346 | 303 | |||||
Prepaid rent, security deposits, and other liabilities | 7,262 | 3,787 | |||||
Total liabilities | 826,291 | 823,327 | |||||
Partners' equity |
77,895 |
101,393 |
|||||
$ | 904,186 | 924,720 | |||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
120
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues: | |||||||||
Minimum rents | $ | 97,626 | 97,843 | 96,509 | |||||
Overage rents | 5,614 | 4,855 | 4,783 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries | 52,786 | 51,480 | 50,381 | ||||||
Other | 2,955 | 3,437 | 3,397 | ||||||
158,981 | 157,615 | 155,070 | |||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||
Property operations | 23,736 | 23,025 | 22,642 | ||||||
Depreciation of properties | 29,730 | 28,058 | 27,128 | ||||||
Real estate taxes | 19,835 | 20,617 | 20,215 | ||||||
Repairs and maintenance | 9,165 | 8,324 | 8,193 | ||||||
Advertising and promotion | 5,035 | 4,862 | 5,119 | ||||||
Management fees | 4,182 | 4,164 | 4,344 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses, net | 499 | 567 | 810 | ||||||
Interest on mortgage notes | 46,598 | 44,393 | 34,758 | ||||||
Other | 1,533 | 1,211 | 1,143 | ||||||
140,313 | 135,221 | 124,352 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of property, net | (4,020 | ) | | 356 | |||||
Net income | $ | 14,648 | 22,394 | 31,074 | |||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
121
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 14,648 | 22,394 | 31,074 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation of properties | 29,730 | 28,058 | 27,128 | |||||||||
Amortization of debt premium | -- | (1,329 | ) | (3,336 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of financing costs | 161 | 572 | 1,159 | |||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of property | 4,020 | -- | (356 | ) | ||||||||
Change in tenant receivables | (2,590 | ) | 1,547 | 3,021 | ||||||||
Other items, net | 4,825 | (1,133 | ) | 1,303 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 50,794 | 50,109 | 59,993 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Additions to properties | (16,371 | ) | (19,778 | ) | (17,551 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of land and building | 10,590 | -- | 5,058 | |||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (5,781 | ) | (19,778 | ) | (12,493 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Payments on mortgage notes payable | (1,960 | ) | (626,126 | ) | -- | |||||||
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable | -- | 796,550 | -- | |||||||||
Deferred financing costs | (7 | ) | (2,311 | ) | -- | |||||||
Distributions to partners | (38,146 | ) | (205,206 | ) | (42,700 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used by financing activities | (40,113 | ) | (37,093 | ) | (42,700 | ) | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 4,900 | (6,762 | ) | 4,800 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 10,951 | 17,713 | 12,913 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 15,851 | 10,951 | 17,713 | ||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash payments for interest | $ | 45,298 | 44,822 | 36,639 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
122
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Simon Property Group, Inc. affiliates |
The Macerich Company affiliates |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
Total |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage ownership interest | 50 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 147,916 | 147,915 | (16 | ) | 295,815 | |||||||
Net income | 15,537 | 15,537 | -- | 31,074 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | -- | -- | 46 | 46 | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 31,120 | ||||||||||||
Distributions | (21,350 | ) | (21,350 | ) | -- | (42,700 | ) | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 142,103 | 142,102 | 30 | 284,235 | |||||||||
Net income | 11,197 | 11,197 | -- | 22,394 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | -- | -- | (30 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||
Total comprehensive income | 22,364 | ||||||||||||
Distributions | (102,603 | ) | (102,603 | ) | -- | (205,206 | ) | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 50,697 | 50,696 | -- | 101,393 | |||||||||
Net income | 7,324 | 7,324 | -- | 14,648 | |||||||||
Distributions | (19,073 | ) | (19,073 | ) | -- | (38,146 | ) | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 38,948 | 38,947 | -- | 77,895 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
123
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(1) General
(a) Partnership Organization
On December 29, 1997, affiliates of Simon Property Group, Inc. (Simon) and The Macerich Company (Macerich) formed a limited partnership to acquire and operate a portfolio of 12 regional shopping centers. SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. (the Partnership) acquired the properties on February 27, 1998.
(b) Properties
Affiliates of Simon and Macerich each manage six of the shopping centers. The shopping centers and their locations are as follows:
Simon managed properties: | |||
South Park Mall | Moline, Illinois | ||
Valley Mall | Harrisonburg, Virginia | ||
Granite Run Mall | Media, Pennsylvania | ||
Eastland Mall and Convenience Center | Evansville, Indiana | ||
Lake Square Mall | Leesburg, Florida | ||
North Park Mall | Davenport, Iowa | ||
Macerich managed properties: | |||
Lindale Mall | Cedar Rapids, Iowa | ||
Mesa Mall | Grand Junction, Colorado | ||
South Ridge Mall | Des Moines, Iowa | ||
Empire Mall and Empire East | Sioux Falls, South Dakota | ||
Rushmore Mall | Rapid City, South Dakota | ||
Southern Hills Mall | Sioux City, Iowa |
The shopping center leases generally provide for fixed annual minimum rent, overage rent based on sales, and reimbursement for certain operating expenses, including real estate taxes. For leases in effect at December 31, 2007, fixed minimum rents to be received in each of the next five years and thereafter are summarized as follows:
2008 | $ | 78,594 | |
2009 | 66,103 | ||
2010 | 53,181 | ||
2011 | 41,382 | ||
2012 | 32,991 | ||
Thereafter | 89,360 | ||
$ | 361,611 | ||
124
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Revenues
All leases are classified as operating leases, and minimum rents are recognized monthly on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases.
Most retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year, generally ending on January 31. Overage rents are recognized as revenues based on reported and estimated sales for each tenant through December 31. Differences between estimated and actual amounts are recognized in the subsequent year.
Tenant recoveries for real estate taxes and common area maintenance are adjusted annually based on actual expenses, and the related revenues are recognized in the year in which the expenses are incurred. Charges for other operating expenses are billed monthly with periodic adjustments based on estimated utility usage and/or a current price index, and the related revenues are recognized as the amounts are billed and as adjustments become determinable.
(b) Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid debt instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
(c) Properties
Properties are recorded at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements | 7-39 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5-7 years | |
Tenant improvements | Shorter of lease terms or useful life |
Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life, increase capacity, or improve the efficiency of the asset. All repairs and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. Interest incurred or imputed on development, redevelopment and construction projects is capitalized until the projects are ready for their intended purpose.
Gains on sales of all properties are recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate ("SFAS 66"). The specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in SFAS 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the Partnership associated with the properties. If the sales criteria are not met, the Partnership defers gain recognition and accounts for the continued operations of the property by applying the finance, installment or cost recovery methods, as appropriate, until the full accrual sales criteria are met.
The Partnership assesses whether there has been an impairment in the value of a property by considering factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Such factors include the tenants' ability to
125
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
perform their duties and pay rent under the terms of the leases. The Partnership would recognize an impairment loss if the estimated future income stream of a property is not sufficient to recover its investment. Such a loss would be the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of a property. Management believes no impairment in the net carrying values of its properties has occurred.
(d) Financing Costs
Financing costs related to the proceeds of mortgage notes issued are amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes.
(e) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(f) Income Taxes
As a partnership, the allocated share of income or loss for the year is includable in the income tax returns of the partners; accordingly, income taxes are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
(g) Derivatives
The Partnership uses derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Partnership requires that hedging derivative instruments are effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. For derivative instruments associated with the hedge of an anticipated transaction, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction occurs. Any instrument that meets these hedging criteria is formally designated as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract. When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified resulting in some ineffectiveness, the portion of the change in the derivative fair value related to ineffectiveness from period to period will be included in net income. If any derivative instrument used for risk management does not meet the hedging criteria, then it is marked-to-market each period and will be included in net income; however, the Partnership intends for all derivative transactions to meet all the hedge criteria and qualify as hedges.
On an ongoing quarterly basis, the Partnership adjusts it balance sheet to reflect the current fair value of it derivatives. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in income or comprehensive income, depending on whether the derivative is designated and effective as part of a hedged transaction, and on the type of hedge transaction. To the extent that the change in value of a derivative does not perfectly offset the change in value of the instrument being hedged, the ineffective portion of the hedge is immediately recognized in income. Over time, the unrealized gains and losses
126
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
held in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified to income. This reclassification occurs when the hedged items are also recognized in income. The Partnership has a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.
To determine the fair value of derivative instruments, the Partnership uses standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, and termination cost at each balance sheet date. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.
(h) Reclassifications
Certain 2006 and 2005 balances have been reclassified to conform to 2007 presentation.
(i) Discontinued Operations
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144") provides a framework for the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, the treatment of assets held for sale or to be otherwise disposed of, and the reporting of discontinued operations. SFAS No. 144 requires the Partnership to reclassify any material operations related to properties sold during the period to discontinued operations. There were no discontinued operations reported in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
(3) Mortgage Notes Payable and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
On May 10, 2006, the Partnership repaid all of its existing mortgage notes payable on their maturity date with the proceeds from seven different mortgage notes payable totaling $796,550. All of the new mortgage notes payable are at fixed interest rates with maturities of June 1, 2016. Each of the seven nonrecourse mortgage notes is collateralized by different shopping center properties. The debt that matured in 2006 consisted of $357,100 of debt that required monthly interest payments at fixed rates of interest ranging from 7.24% to 8.28% (weighted average rate of 7.53%) and $267,900 of debt that required monthly interest payments at variable rates of interest (based on LIBOR) with rates ranging from 4.71% to 4.84%. In addition, the remaining unamortized debt premium of $1,329 was amortized to interest expense in 2006. This premium was recorded when the matured debt was assumed by the Partnership when the properties were initially acquired in 1998.
In connection with the variable rate mortgage notes that were repaid in 2006, the Company had two separate interest rate cap agreements that effectively prevented the variable interest rate from exceeding rates ranging from 10.63% to 11.83%. These interest rate cap agreements were terminated in connection with repayment of debt in 2006.
127
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(3) Mortgage Notes Payable and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
Property pledged as collateral |
Original principal balance |
Interest rate |
Type of payments |
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastland Mall | $168,000 | 5.794 | % | Interest only | $ | 168,000 | 168,000 | ||||
Granite Run Mall | 122,000 | 5.834 | % | Principal and interest | 119,811 | 121,190 | |||||
Valley Mall | 47,500 | 5.834 | % | Principal and interest | 46,603 | 47,184 | |||||
Empire Mall | 176,300 | 5.794 | % | Interest only | 176,300 | 176,300 | |||||
Mesa Mall | 87,250 | 5.794 | % | Interest only | 87,250 | 87,250 | |||||
Rushmore Mall | 94,000 | 5.794 | % | Interest only | 94,000 | 94,000 | |||||
Southern Hills Mall | 101,500 | 5.794 | % | Interest only | 101,500 | 101,500 | |||||
$796,550 | $ | 793,464 | 795,424 | ||||||||
Total interest expense capitalized in 2007 and 2006 was $301 and $207, respectively.
The above mortgage notes payable mature as follows:
2008 | $ | 2,175 | |
2009 | 2,335 | ||
2010 | 2,479 | ||
2011 | 2,627 | ||
2012 | 2,760 | ||
Thereafter | 781,088 | ||
$ | 793,464 | ||
The fair value of the fixed-rate debt of $793,464 and $795,424 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, based on interest rates for comparable loans of 5.45% and 5.70%, respectively, is estimated to be $812,185 and $801,352, respectively. The carrying value of the Partnership's other financial instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are estimated to approximate their fair values.
(4) Related Party Transactions
Management fees incurred in 2007, 2006, and 2005 totaled $2,020, $2,063, and $2,042, respectively, for the Simon-managed properties and $2,162, $2,101, and $2,302, respectively, for the Macerich-managed properties, both based on a fee of 4% of gross receipts, as defined. In addition to the management fees, Macerich charged the Partnership an additional $598, $627, and $521 for shared services fees in 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively. In 2007, the Partnership paid a development fee of $91 to an affiliate of Macerich.
Due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheets represent amounts due to Simon or Macerich or an affiliate of Simon or Macerich in the normal course of operations of the shopping center properties.
128
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
(5) Contingent Liabilities
The Partnership is not currently involved with any litigation other than routine and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. On the basis of consultation with counsel, management believes that these items will not have a material adverse impact on the Partnership's financial statements taken as a whole.
(6) Property Sales
In January 2007, the Partnership sold a portion of the shopping center at Eastland Mall that had previously been occupied by a major tenant to another major tenant. The sale of the land and building resulted in a loss of approximately $4,800 which was recognized at the time of the sale in 2007.
In December 2007, the Partnership sold three outlots of land at South Park Mall. The sale of the land resulted in a gain of approximately $780, which was recognized at the time of the sale in 2007.
(7) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," (FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for uncertain income tax positions by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods and disclosures for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Partnership adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The impact of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Partnership's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
The tax years 2004-2006 remain open to examination by the taxing jurisdictions to which the Partnership is subject.
129
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
Total Cost Net of Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shopping Centers Entities |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Equipment and Furnishings |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment |
Construction in Progress |
Total |
Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Canyon Auto Park | $ | 20,600 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 39 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 20,639 | $ | 20,639 | $ | -- | $ | 20,639 | |||||||||||
Black Canyon Retail | -- | -- | -- | 383 | -- | -- | -- | 383 | 383 | -- | 383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Borgata | 3,667 | 28,080 | -- | 7,128 | 3,667 | 34,949 | 137 | 122 | 38,875 | 5,043 | 33,832 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cactus Power Center | 15,374 | | | 2,544 | -- | -- | -- | 17,918 | 17,918 | | 17,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitola Mall | 11,312 | 46,689 | -- | 7,256 | 11,309 | 53,456 | 487 | 5 | 65,257 | 17,217 | 48,040 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carmel Plaza | 9,080 | 36,354 | -- | 15,307 | 9,080 | 51,421 | 240 | -- | 60,741 | 11,611 | 49,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Chandler Fashion Center | 24,188 | 223,143 | -- | 5,457 | 24,188 | 228,002 | 562 | 36 | 252,788 | 36,263 | 216,525 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesterfield Towne Center | 18,517 | 72,936 | 2 | 24,969 | 18,517 | 91,825 | 2,887 | 3,195 | 116,424 | 42,569 | 73,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Coolidge Holding | -- | -- | -- | 55 | -- | -- | -- | 55 | 55 | -- | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Danbury Fair Mall | 130,367 | 316,951 | -- | 43,695 | 130,367 | 342,629 | 1,306 | 16,711 | 491,013 | 25,256 | 465,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deptford Mall | 48,370 | 194,250 | -- | (5,226 | ) | 56,821 | 180,530 | 43 | -- | 237,394 | 6,202 | 231,192 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eastview Commons | 3,999 | 8,609 | -- | 5 | 3,999 | 8,614 | -- | -- | 12,613 | 1,096 | 11,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Eastview Mall | 51,090 | 166,281 | -- | 4,336 | 51,090 | 170,533 | -- | 84 | 221,707 | 13,911 | 207,796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estrella Falls | 10,550 | -- | -- | 7,421 | -- | -- | -- | 17,971 | 17,971 | -- | 17,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiesta Mall | 19,445 | 99,116 | -- | 35,424 | 20,483 | 113,055 | 60 | 20,387 | 153,985 | 10,615 | 143,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Flagstaff Mall | 5,480 | 31,773 | -- | 8,938 | 5,480 | 40,520 | 187 | 4 | 46,191 | 6,060 | 40,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FlatIron Crossing | 21,823 | 286,809 | -- | 13,497 | 21,823 | 293,831 | 67 | 6,408 | 322,129 | 40,792 | 281,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FlatIron Peripheral | 6,205 | -- | -- | (50 | ) | 6,155 | -- | -- | -- | 6,155 | -- | 6,155 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Freehold Raceway Mall | 164,986 | 362,841 | -- | 70,716 | 175,763 | 406,763 | 756 | 15,261 | 598,543 | 31,443 | 567,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fresno Fashion Fair | 17,966 | 72,194 | -- | 39,560 | 17,966 | 110,461 | 1,273 | 20 | 129,720 | 27,121 | 102,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Northern Mall | 12,187 | 62,657 | -- | 3,832 | 12,187 | 65,980 | 309 | 200 | 78,676 | 7,019 | 71,657 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Greece Ridge Center | 21,627 | 76,038 | -- | 5,169 | 21,593 | 81,219 | -- | 22 | 102,834 | 8,703 | 94,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Tree Mall | 4,947 | 14,925 | 332 | 28,982 | 4,947 | 43,293 | 946 | -- | 49,186 | 32,095 | 17,091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hilton Village | -- | 19,067 | -- | 956 | -- | 20,015 | 8 | -- | 20,023 | 1,555 | 18,468 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Houghton Road Corridor | -- | -- | -- | 1,390 | -- | -- | -- | 1,390 | 1,390 | -- | 1,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
La Cumbre Plaza | 18,122 | 21,492 | -- | 14,983 | 17,280 | 36,477 | 124 | 716 | 54,597 | 4,741 | 49,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Macerich Cerritos Adjacent, LLC | -- | 6,448 | -- | (5,692 | ) | -- | 756 | -- | -- | 756 | 135 | 621 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Macerich Management Co. | -- | 2,237 | 26,562 | 30,235 | 390 | 5,158 | 45,277 | 8,209 | 59,034 | 22,434 | 36,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Macerich Property Management Co., LLC | -- | -- | 2,808 | (997 | ) | -- | 1,743 | 68 | -- | 1,811 | 1,601 | 210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
MACWH, LP | -- | 25,771 | -- | 4,303 | -- | 28,897 | 849 | 328 | 30,074 | 2,485 | 27,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketplace Mall | -- | 102,856 | -- | 2,246 | -- | 105,048 | -- | 54 | 105,102 | 10,078 | 95,024 |
130
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
Total Cost Net of Accumulated Depreciation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shopping Centers Entities |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Equipment and Furnishings |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment |
Construction in Progress |
Total |
Accumulated Depreciation |
|||||||||||||
Mervyn's | 19,876 | 118,089 | | | 19,876 | 115,086 | -- | 3,003 | 137,965 | 172 | 137,793 | |||||||||||
Northgate Mall | 8,400 | 34,865 | 841 | 26,168 | 13,414 | 53,245 | 1,017 | 2,598 | 70,274 | 32,917 | 37,357 | |||||||||||
Northridge Mall | 20,100 | 101,170 | -- | 10,092 | 20,100 | 110,694 | 376 | 192 | 131,362 | 15,195 | 116,167 | |||||||||||
Oaks, The | 32,300 | 117,156 | -- | 123,179 | 34,505 | 131,907 | 340 | 105,883 | 272,635 | 19,591 | 253,044 | |||||||||||
Pacific View | 8,697 | 8,696 | -- | 110,073 | 7,854 | 118,112 | 1,210 | 290 | 127,466 | 25,549 | 101,917 | |||||||||||
Panorama Mall | 4,373 | 17,491 | -- | 3,380 | 4,373 | 20,333 | 210 | 328 | 25,244 | 2,987 | 22,257 | |||||||||||
Paradise Valley Mall | 24,565 | 125,996 | -- | 19,047 | 24,565 | 130,977 | 526 | 13,540 | 169,608 | 20,867 | 148,741 | |||||||||||
Paradise Village Ground Leases | 8,880 | 2,489 | -- | 4,592 | 15,063 | 786 | -- | 112 | 15,961 | 300 | 15,661 | |||||||||||
Pittsford Plaza | 9,022 | 47,362 | -- | 11,273 | 9,023 | 58,536 | -- | 98 | 67,657 | 4,737 | 62,920 | |||||||||||
Prasada | 6,365 | | | 4,794 | -- | -- | -- | 11,159 | 11,159 | | 11,159 | |||||||||||
Prescott Gateway | 5,733 | 49,778 | -- | 4,844 | 5,733 | 54,568 | 54 | -- | 60,355 | 10,102 | 50,253 | |||||||||||
Prescott Peripheral | -- | -- | -- | 5,599 | 1,345 | 4,254 | -- | -- | 5,599 | 372 | 5,227 | |||||||||||
Promenade at Casa Grande | 15,089 | -- | -- | 86,030 | 1,914 | 45,559 | -- | 53,646 | 101,119 | 315 | 100,804 | |||||||||||
PVOP II | 1,150 | 1,790 | -- | 3,465 | 2,300 | 3,810 | 295 | -- | 6,405 | 1,275 | 5,130 | |||||||||||
Queens Center | 21,460 | 86,631 | 8 | 284,062 | 37,160 | 351,593 | 3,385 | 23 | 392,161 | 53,067 | 339,094 | |||||||||||
Rimrock Mall | 8,737 | 35,652 | -- | 10,866 | 8,737 | 45,900 | 618 | -- | 55,255 | 14,624 | 40,631 | |||||||||||
Rotterdam Square | 7,018 | 32,736 | -- | 1,278 | 7,018 | 33,749 | 265 | -- | 41,032 | 4,093 | 36,939 | |||||||||||
Salisbury, The Centre at | 15,290 | 63,474 | 31 | 21,962 | 15,284 | 84,489 | 984 | -- | 100,757 | 24,510 | 76,247 | |||||||||||
Santa Monica Place | 26,400 | 105,600 | -- | 47,340 | 40,446 | 109,538 | 1,408 | 27,948 | 179,340 | 24,375 | 154,965 | |||||||||||
SanTan Village Regional Center | 7,827 | -- | -- | 149,085 | 6,981 | 108,804 | 604 | 40,523 | 156,912 | 1,284 | 155,628 | |||||||||||
Shoppingtown Mall | 11,927 | 61,824 | -- | 3,965 | 11,927 | 63,006 | 162 | 2,621 | 77,716 | 5,855 | 71,861 | |||||||||||
Somersville Town Center | 4,096 | 20,317 | 1,425 | 14,582 | 4,099 | 35,534 | 661 | 126 | 40,420 | 18,840 | 21,580 | |||||||||||
South Plains Mall | 23,100 | 92,728 | -- | 10,215 | 23,100 | 100,512 | 1,558 | 873 | 126,043 | 26,881 | 99,162 | |||||||||||
South Towne Center | 19,600 | 78,954 | -- | 15,572 | 19,454 | 92,604 | 736 | 1,332 | 114,126 | 27,983 | 86,143 | |||||||||||
Superstition Springs Power Center | 1,618 | 4,420 | -- | (18 | ) | 1,618 | 4,402 | -- | -- | 6,020 | 676 | 5,344 | ||||||||||
The Macerich Partnership, L.P. | -- | 2,534 | -- | 6,179 | 212 | 1,953 | 5,290 | 1,258 | 8,713 | 733 | 7,980 | |||||||||||
The Shops at Tangerine (Marana) | 36,158 | -- | -- | 2,527 | 36,158 | -- | -- | 2,527 | 38,685 | -- | 38,685 | |||||||||||
Towne Mall | 6,652 | 31,184 | -- | 467 | 6,652 | 31,581 | 70 | -- | 38,303 | 3,689 | 34,614 |
131
THE MACERICH COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
Total Cost Net of Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shopping Centers Entities |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Equipment and Furnishings |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment |
Construction in Progress |
Total |
Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Marketplace at Flagstaff Mall | -- | -- | -- | 50,749 | -- | 35,840 | 5 | 14,904 | 50,749 | 226 | 50,523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tucson La Encantada | 12,800 | 19,699 | -- | 55,149 | 12,800 | 74,612 | 236 | -- | 87,648 | 13,590 | 74,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Twenty Ninth Street | 50 | 37,793 | 64 | 204,934 | 23,599 | 218,225 | 1,017 | -- | 242,841 | 39,099 | 203,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Valley River | 24,854 | 147,715 | -- | 8,536 | 24,854 | 156,209 | 42 | -- | 181,105 | 9,404 | 171,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Valley View Center | 17,100 | 68,687 | -- | 50,080 | 20,754 | 109,789 | 1,776 | 3,548 | 135,867 | 31,832 | 104,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Victor Valley, Mall at | 15,700 | 75,230 | -- | 26,169 | 15,061 | 100,304 | 716 | 1,018 | 117,099 | 10,505 | 106,594 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Center | 2,250 | 4,459 | -- | 9,890 | 4,500 | 12,028 | 28 | 43 | 16,599 | 4,090 | 12,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Crossroads | 3,100 | 4,493 | -- | 8,859 | 6,200 | 10,171 | -- | 81 | 16,452 | 1,668 | 14,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Fair North | 3,500 | 8,567 | -- | 13,872 | 7,000 | 18,889 | 11 | 39 | 25,939 | 3,563 | 22,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Plaza | 3,423 | 8,688 | -- | 680 | 3,423 | 8,963 | 22 | 383 | 12,791 | 1,588 | 11,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Square I | -- | 2,844 | -- | 381 | 358 | 2,835 | 4 | 28 | 3,225 | 458 | 2,767 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Square II | -- | 8,492 | -- | 4,559 | 4,389 | 8,634 | 3 | 25 | 13,051 | 1,612 | 11,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage Faire Mall | 14,902 | 60,532 | -- | 25,115 | 14,298 | 83,288 | 1,095 | 1,868 | 100,549 | 26,872 | 73,677 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Wadell Center West | 12,056 | | | (2,319 | ) | -- | -- | -- | 9,737 | 9,737 | | 9,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Westcor / Queen Creek | -- | -- | -- | 262 | -- | -- | -- | 262 | 262 | -- | 262 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Westside Pavilion | 34,100 | 136,819 | -- | 53,012 | 34,100 | 174,847 | 2,746 | 12,238 | 223,931 | 42,672 | 181,259 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilton Mall | 19,743 | 67,855 | -- | 4,132 | 19,289 | 72,000 | 143 | 298 | 91,730 | 6,147 | 85,583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,157,913 | $ | 4,170,326 | $ | 32,073 | $ | 1,861,539 | $ | 1,182,641 | $ | 5,513,341 | $ | 83,199 | $ | 442,670 | $ | 7,221,851 | $ | 900,360 | $ | 6,321,491 | ||||||||||||
132
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Schedule IIIReal Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation of the Company's investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the statements of income are calculated over the estimated useful lives of the asset as follows:
Buildings and improvements | 5-40 years | |
Tenant improvements | 5-7 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5-7 years |
The changes in total real estate assets for the three years ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances, beginning of year | $ | 6,499,205 | $ | 6,160,595 | $ | 4,149,776 | ||||
Additions | 764,972 | 839,445 | 2,016,081 | |||||||
Dispositions and retirements | (42,326 | ) | (500,835 | ) | (5,262 | ) | ||||
Balances, end of year | $ | 7,221,851 | $ | 6,499,205 | $ | 6,160,595 | ||||
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the three years ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances, beginning of year | $ | 743,922 | $ | 722,099 | $ | 575,223 | ||||
Additions | 181,810 | 224,273 | 148,116 | |||||||
Dispositions and retirements | (25,372 | ) | (202,450 | ) | (1,240 | ) | ||||
Balances, end of year | $ | 900,360 | $ | 743,922 | $ | 722,099 | ||||
133
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
Total Cost Net of Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shopping Centers Entities |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Equipment and Furnishings |
Land |
Building and Improvements |
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment |
Construction in Progress |
Total |
Accumulated Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cascade Mall | $ | 8,200 | $ | 32,843 | $ | -- | $ | 4,295 | $ | 8,200 | $ | 36,796 | $ | 342 | $ | -- | $ | 45,338 | $ | 8,876 | $ | 36,462 | |||||||||||
Creekside Crossing | 620 | 2,495 | -- | 232 | 620 | 2,727 | -- | -- | 3,347 | 619 | 2,728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cross Court Plaza | 1,400 | 5,629 | -- | 397 | 1,400 | 6,026 | -- | -- | 7,426 | 1,388 | 6,038 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitsap Mall | 13,590 | 56,672 | -- | 3,577 | 13,486 | 60,181 | 172 | -- | 73,839 | 14,749 | 59,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitsap Place Mall | 1,400 | 5,627 | -- | 2,936 | 1,400 | 8,563 | -- | -- | 9,963 | 1,671 | 8,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakewood Mall | 48,025 | 112,059 | -- | 56,161 | 48,025 | 156,634 | 2,225 | 9,361 | 216,245 | 35,071 | 181,174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Cerritos Center | 57,000 | 133,000 | -- | 20,345 | 57,000 | 138,947 | 2,316 | 12,082 | 210,345 | 31,443 | 178,902 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Northpoint Plaza | 1,400 | 5,627 | -- | 682 | 1,397 | 6,312 | -- | -- | 7,709 | 1,329 | 6,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redmond Towne Center | 18,381 | 73,868 | -- | 19,671 | 17,864 | 93,779 | 253 | 24 | 111,920 | 22,007 | 89,913 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redmond Office | 20,676 | 90,929 | -- | 15,234 | 20,675 | 106,164 | -- | -- | 126,839 | 22,538 | 104,301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stonewood Mall | 30,902 | 72,104 | -- | 7,155 | 30,902 | 78,465 | 794 | -- | 110,161 | 17,426 | 92,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Square Mall | 33,600 | 135,084 | -- | 65,154 | 33,600 | 190,210 | 1,833 | 8,195 | 233,838 | 37,963 | 195,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Square Too | 4,000 | 16,087 | -- | 718 | 4,000 | 16,277 | 57 | 471 | 20,805 | 3,716 | 17,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 239,194 | $ | 742,024 | $ | -- | $ | 196,557 | $ | 238,569 | $ | 901,081 | $ | 7,992 | $ | 30,133 | $ | 1,177,775 | $ | 198,796 | $ | 978,979 | ||||||||||||
134
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Schedule IIIReal Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation of the Company's investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the statements of income are calculated over the estimated useful lives of the asset as follows:
Buildings and improvements | 5 - 40 years | |
Tenant improvements | 5 - 7 years | |
Equipment and furnishings | 5 - 7 years |
The changes in total real estate assets for the three years ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances, beginning of year | $ | 1,159,416 | $ | 1,136,940 | $ | 1,089,108 | |||
Additions | 18,359 | 22,476 | 47,832 | ||||||
Dispositions and retirements | | | | ||||||
Balances, end of year | $ | 1,177,775 | $ | 1,159,416 | $ | 1,136,940 | |||
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the three years ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances, beginning of year | $ | 171,596 | $ | 145,186 | $ | 120,384 | |||
Additions | 27,200 | 26,410 | 24,802 | ||||||
Dispositions and retirements | | | | ||||||
Balances, end of year | $ | 198,796 | $ | 171,596 | $ | 145,186 | |||
135
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Schedule IIIReal Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross book value at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Initial cost to partnership |
Costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Total cost net of accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||
Shopping Center(1) |
Location |
Land |
Building and improvements |
Equipment and furnishings |
Land |
Building and improvements |
Equipment and furnishings |
Accumulated depreciation |
|||||||||||||
Mesa Mall | Grand Junction, Colorado | $ | 11,155 | 44,635 | | 8,473 | 11,155 | 52,757 | 351 | (14,776 | ) | 49,487 | |||||||||
Lake Square Mall | Leesburg, Florida | 7,348 | 29,392 | | 2,460 | 7,348 | 31,609 | 243 | (8,314 | ) | 30,886 | ||||||||||
South Park Mall | Moline, Illinois | 21,341 | 85,540 | | 6,335 | 18,742 | 93,893 | 581 | (23,070 | ) | 90,146 | ||||||||||
Eastland Mall | Evansville, Indiana | 28,160 | 112,642 | | 6,407 | 21,427 | 124,596 | 1,186 | (33,591 | ) | 113,618 | ||||||||||
Lindale Mall | Cedar Rapids, Iowa | 12,534 | 50,151 | | 5,502 | 12,534 | 55,159 | 494 | (15,169 | ) | 53,018 | ||||||||||
North Park Mall | Davenport, Iowa | 17,210 | 69,042 | | 11,171 | 14,947 | 81,710 | 766 | (20,278 | ) | 77,145 | ||||||||||
South Ridge Mall | Des Moines, Iowa | 11,524 | 46,097 | | 14,149 | 12,110 | 58,984 | 676 | (14,154 | ) | 57,616 | ||||||||||
Granite Run Mall | Media, Pennsylvania | 26,147 | 104,671 | | 5,751 | 26,147 | 109,847 | 575 | (28,374 | ) | 108,195 | ||||||||||
Rushmore Mall | Rapid City, South Dakota | 12,089 | 50,588 | | 6,144 | 12,089 | 56,287 | 445 | (16,679 | ) | 52,142 | ||||||||||
Empire Mall | Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 23,706 | 94,860 | | 15,995 | 23,067 | 111,134 | 360 | (32,402 | ) | 102,159 | ||||||||||
Empire East | Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 2,073 | 8,291 | | 1,493 | 1,854 | 9,989 | 14 | (2,426 | ) | 9,431 | ||||||||||
Southern Hills Mall | Sioux City, Iowa | 15,697 | 62,793 | | 8,721 | 15,697 | 71,382 | 132 | (18,739 | ) | 68,472 | ||||||||||
Valley Mall | Harrisonburg, Virginia | 10,393 | 41,572 | | 13,264 | 10,345 | 54,409 | 475 | (13,619 | ) | 51,610 | ||||||||||
$ | 199,377 | 800,274 | | 105,865 | 187,462 | 911,756 | 6,298 | (241,591 | ) | 863,925 | |||||||||||
136
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2007
(Dollar in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization of the Partnership's investment in shopping center properties reflected in the statement of operations are calculated over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Building and improvements: | |||
Building and building improvements | 35 - 39 years | ||
Tenant improvements | Shorter of lease term or useful life | ||
Equipment and furnishings | 5 - 7 years |
The changes in total shopping center properties for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
$ |
1,079,999 |
||
Acquisitions in 2005 | ||||
Additions in 2005 | 17,551 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2005 | (6,098 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 1,091,452 | |||
Acquisitions in 2006 | -- | |||
Additions in 2006 | 19,778 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2006 | (5,246 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 1,105,984 | |||
Acquisitions in 2007 | -- | |||
Additions in 2007 | 16,371 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2007 | (16,839 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 1,105,516 | ||
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
$ |
165,538 |
||
Additions in 2005 | 27,128 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2005 | (1,396 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 191,270 | |||
Additions in 2006 | 28,058 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2006 | (5,238 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 214,090 | |||
Additions in 2007 | 29,730 | |||
Disposals and retirements in 2007 | (2,229 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 241,591 | ||
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
137
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 27, 2008.
THE MACERICH COMPANY | |||
By |
/s/ ARTHUR M. COPPOLA Arthur M. Coppola President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Capacity |
Date |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ ARTHUR M. COPPOLA Arthur M. Coppola |
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | February 27, 2008 | ||
/s/ MACE SIEGEL Mace Siegel |
Chairman of the Board |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ DANA K. ANDERSON Dana K. Anderson |
Vice Chairman of the Board |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ EDWARD C. COPPOLA Edward C. Coppola |
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ JAMES COWNIE James Cownie |
Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ DIANA LAING Diana Laing |
Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ FREDERICK HUBBELL Frederick Hubbell |
Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ STANLEY MOORE Stanley Moore |
Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ DR. WILLIAM SEXTON Dr. William Sexton |
Director |
February 27, 2008 |
||
/s/ THOMAS E. O'HERN Thomas E. O'Hern |
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
February 27, 2008 |
138
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Sequentially Numbered Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
3.1* | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company | |||
3.1.1** |
Articles Supplementary of the Company |
|||
3.1.2*** |
Articles Supplementary of the Company (Series A Preferred Stock) |
|||
3.1.3### |
Articles Supplementary of the Company (Series C Junior Participating Preferred Stock) |
|||
3.1.4******* |
Articles Supplementary of the Company (Series D Preferred Stock) |
|||
3.1.5******# |
Articles Supplementary of the Company (reclassification of shares) |
|||
3.2**##### |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (February 8, 2007) |
|||
4.1***** |
Form of Common Stock Certificate |
|||
4.2****** |
Form of Preferred Stock Certificate (Series A Preferred Stock) |
|||
4.2.1***** |
Form of Preferred Stock/Right Certificate (Series C Junior Participating Preferred Stock) |
|||
4.2.2********# |
Form of Preferred Stock Certificate (Series D Preferred Stock) |
|||
4.3***** |
Agreement dated as of November 10, 1998 between the Company and Computershare Investor Services, as successor to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., as successor to First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent |
|||
4.4**######## |
Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2007, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (includes form of the Notes and Guarantee) |
|||
10.1******** |
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated as of March 16, 1994 |
|||
10.1.1**** |
Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated June 27, 1997 |
|||
10.1.2****** |
Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated November 16, 1997 |
|||
10.1.3****** |
Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated February 25, 1998 |
|||
10.1.4****** |
Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated February 26, 1998 |
139
10.1.5### |
Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated June 17, 1998 |
|||
10.1.6### |
Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated December 23, 1998 |
|||
10.1.7####### |
Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated November 9, 2000 |
|||
10.1.8******* |
Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated July 26, 2002 |
|||
10.1.9#### |
Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated October 26, 2006 |
|||
10.1.10**######## |
Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership dated as of March 16, 2007 |
|||
10.1.11**### |
Form of Twelfth Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement for the Operating Partnership |
|||
10.2#### |
Form of Termination of Employment Agreement dated as of October 26, 2006(1) |
|||
10.2.1#### |
List of Omitted Termination of Employment Agreements(1) |
|||
10.2.2#### |
Employment Agreement between the Company and Tony Grossi dated November 1, 2006(1) |
|||
10.2.3**# |
Separation Agreement between the Company and David Contis dated October 5, 2006(1) |
|||
10.3****** |
Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.3.1######## |
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan dated as of March 31, 2001(1) |
|||
10.3.2*******# |
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan (October 29, 2003)(1) |
|||
10.4# |
1994 Eligible Directors' Stock Option Plan(1) |
|||
10.4.1*******# |
Amendment to 1994 Eligible Directors Stock Option Plan (October 29, 2003)(1) |
|||
10.5*******# |
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (2003)(1) |
|||
10.5.1**## |
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives(1) |
140
10.6*******# |
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives (2003)(1) |
|||
10.6.1**## |
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives(1) |
|||
10.7**## |
Eligible Directors' Deferred Compensation/Phantom Stock Plan (as amended and restated as of January 1, 2005)(1) |
|||
10.8******** |
Executive Officer Salary Deferral Plan(1) |
|||
10.8.1*******# |
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 to Executive Officer Salary Deferral Plan(1) |
|||
10.8.2**## |
Amendment No. 3 to Executive Officer Salary Deferral Plan(1) |
|||
10.9******** |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 1994, between the Company and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company |
|||
10.10******** |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 1994, among the Company and Mace Siegel, Dana K. Anderson, Arthur M. Coppola and Edward C. Coppola |
|||
10.11******** |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 1994, among the Company, Richard M. Cohen and MRII Associates |
|||
10.12****** |
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 25, 1998 between the Company and Security Capital Preferred Growth Incorporated |
|||
10.13******** |
Incidental Registration Rights Agreement dated March 16, 1994 |
|||
10.14****** |
Incidental Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 21, 1994 |
|||
10.15****** |
Incidental Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 15, 1995 |
|||
10.16****** |
Incidental Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 21, 1995 |
|||
10.17****** |
List of Omitted Incidental/Demand Registration Rights Agreements |
|||
10.18### |
Redemption, Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement dated as of July 24, 1998 between the Company and Harry S. Newman, Jr. and LeRoy H. Brettin |
|||
10.19******** |
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 16, 1994, between the Company and Mace Siegel |
|||
10.19.1******** |
List of Omitted Indemnification Agreements |
|||
10.20******* |
Form of Registration Rights Agreement with Series D Preferred Unit Holders |
|||
10.20.1******* |
List of Omitted Registration Rights Agreements |
141
10.21**### |
$650,000,000 Interim Loan Facility and $450,000,000 Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2005 among the Operating Partnership, the Company, Macerich WRLP Corp., Macerich WRLP LLC, Macerich WRLP II Corp., Macerich WRLP II LP, Macerich TWC II Corp., Macerich TWC II LLC, Macerich Walleye LLC, IMI Walleye LLC, Walleye Retail Investments LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and various lenders |
|||
10.21.1**###### |
First Amendment to $450,000,000 Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement dated as of July 20, 2006 among the Operating Partnership, the Company, Macerich WRLP Corp., Macerich WRLP LLC, Macerich WRLP II Corp., Macerich WRLP II LP, Macerich TWC II Corp., Macerich TWC II LLC, Macerich Walleye LLC, IMI Walleye LLC, Walleye Retail Investments LLC, the agent and various lenders party thereto |
|||
10.22**###### |
$1,500,000,000 Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Facility Credit Agreement dated as of July 20, 2006 among the Operating Partnership, the Company, Macerich WRLP Corp., Macerich WRLP LLC, Macerich WRLP II Corp., Macerich WRLP II LP, Macerich TWC II Corp., Macerich TWC II LLC, Macerich Walleye LLC, IMI Walleye LLC, Walleye Retail Investments LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and various lenders |
|||
10.22.1***## |
First Amendment dated as of July 3, 2007 to the $1,500,000 Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Facility Credit Agreement |
|||
10.22.2**### |
Amended and Restated $250,000,000 Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2005 among the Operating Partnership, the Company, Macerich WRLP Corp., Macerich WRLP LLC, Macerich WRLP II Corp., Macerich WRLP II LP, Macerich TWC II Corp., Macerich TWC II LLC, Macerich Walleye LLC, IMI Walleye LLC, Walleye Retail Investments LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and various lenders |
|||
10.22.3**###### |
First Amendment to Amended and Restated $250,000,000 Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement dated as of July 20, 2006 among the Operating Partnership, the Company, Macerich WRLP Corp., Macerich WRLP LLC, Macerich WRLP II Corp., Macerich WRLP II LP, Macerich TWC II Corp., Macerich TWC II LLC, Macerich Walleye LLC, IMI Walleye LLC, Walleye Retail Investments LLC, the agent and various lenders thereto |
|||
10.23## |
Form of Incidental Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and various investors dated as of July 26, 2002 |
|||
10.23.1## |
List of Omitted Incidental Registration Rights Agreements |
142
10.24*# |
Tax Matters Agreement dated as of July 26, 2002 between The Macerich Partnership L.P. and the Protected Partners |
|||
10.24.1**### |
Tax Matters Agreement (Wilmorite) |
|||
10.25####### |
2000 Incentive Plan effective as of November 9, 2000 (including 2000 Cash Bonus/Restricted Stock Program and Stock Unit Program and Award Agreements)(1) |
|||
10.25.1######## |
Amendment to the 2000 Incentive Plan dated March 31, 2001(1) |
|||
10.25.2*******# |
Amendment to 2000 Incentive Plan (October 29, 2003)(1) |
|||
10.26####### |
Form of Stock Option Agreements under the 2000 Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.27****# |
2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.27.1*******# |
Amendment to 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (October 29, 2003)(1) |
|||
10.27.2***## |
Amended and Restated Cash Bonus/Restricted Stock and LTIP Unit Award Program under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.28 |
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.29*****# |
Form of Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.30 |
Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.31*****# |
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.32***# |
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Management Directors(1) |
|||
10.32.1#### |
Form of LTIP Award Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Performance Vesting)(1) |
|||
10.32.2***## |
Form of LTIP Award Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Time Vesting)(1) |
|||
10.32.3 |
Form of Stock Appreciation Right under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan(1) |
|||
10.33****# |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|||
10.33.1*****# |
Amendment 2003-1 to Employee Stock Purchase Plan (October 29, 2003) |
|||
10.34#### |
Form of Management Continuity Agreement(1) |
|||
10.34.1#### |
List of Omitted Management Continuity Agreements(1) |
|||
10.35*******# |
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Mace Siegel dated October 29, 2003 |
143
10.35.1#### |
List of Omitted Indemnification Agreements |
|||
10.36*******# |
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 18, 2003 by the Operating Partnership, the Company and Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership (Registration rights assigned by Taubman to three assignees) |
|||
10.37****** |
Partnership Agreement of S.M. Portfolio Ltd. Partnership |
|||
10.38**### |
2005 Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of MACWH, LP dated as of April 25, 2005 |
|||
10.39**### |
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 25, 2005 among the Company and the persons names on Exhibit A thereto |
|||
10.40**######## |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2007, among the Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
|||
10.41**#### |
Description of Director and Executive Compensation Arrangements(1) |
|||
21.1 |
List of Subsidiaries |
|||
23.1 |
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Deloitte and Touche LLP) |
|||
23.2 |
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP) |
|||
31.1 |
Section 302 Certification of Arthur Coppola, Chief Executive Officer |
|||
31.2 |
Section 302 Certification of Thomas O'Hern, Chief Financial Officer |
|||
32.1 |
Section 906 Certifications of Arthur Coppola and Thomas O'Hern |
|||
99.1**####### |
Guidelines on Corporate Governance (as amended on April 27, 2006) |
|||
99.2**######## |
Capped Call Confirmation dated as of March 12, 2007 by and among the Company, Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch |
|||
99.2.1**######## |
Amendment to Capped Call Confirmation dated as of March 15, 2007, by and among the Company, Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch |
|||
99.3**######## |
Capped Call Confirmation dated as of March 12, 2007 by and between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
144
99.3.1**######## |
Amendment to Capped Call Confirmation dated as of March 15, 2007 by and between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
* | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended (No. 33-68964), and incorporated herein by reference. | |
** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date May 30, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
*** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date February 25, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date June 20, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
***** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date November 10, 1998, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
****** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
******* | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date July 26, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
******** | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
## | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
#### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
##### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
###### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
####### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
######## | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
*# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date October 5, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. |
145
***# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
****# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
*****# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
******# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended (No. 333-88718), and incorporated herein by reference. | |
*******# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
********# | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-107063), and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**## | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date April 25, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**#### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date January 26, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**##### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date February 8, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**###### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date July 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**####### | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date April 27, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
**######## | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, event date March 16, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
***## | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(1) | Represents a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K. |
146
FORM OF RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
THE MACERICH COMPANY
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Participant Name: | «Name» | |
Soc. Sec. No.: | «SSN» | |
No. of Shares: | «Shares»(1) | |
Vesting Schedule: |
[331/3%] of the shares on each successive [March] , beginning [March] , and ending [March] , . |
|
Award Date: |
[March] , |
THIS AGREEMENT is among THE MACERICH COMPANY, a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), THE MACERICH PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), and the Participant named above (the "Participant") and is delivered under The Macerich Company 2003 Equity Incentive Plan which includes any applicable programs under the Plan (the "Plan").
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Corporation has granted to the Participant with reference to services rendered and to be rendered to the Company, effective as of the Award Date, a restricted stock award (the "Restricted Stock Award" or "Award"), upon the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of services rendered and to be rendered by the Participant and the mutual promises made herein and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as follows:
1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Plan.
2. Grant. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Plan, the Corporation grants to the Participant a Restricted Stock Award with respect to an aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Restricted Stock") set forth above. The consideration for the shares issuable with respect to the Award on the terms set forth in this Agreement includes services and other consideration in an amount not less than the minimum lawful consideration under Maryland law.
3. Vesting. The Award shall vest, and restrictions (other than those set forth in Section 6.4 of the Plan) shall lapse, with respect to the portion of the total number of shares (subject to adjustment under Section 6.2 of the Plan), as reflected in the Vesting Schedule above, subject to earlier termination or acceleration as provided herein or in the Plan.
4. Continuance of Employment Required. The Participant agrees to provide services to the Company in consideration for the conditional rights to the unvested shares of Restricted Stock subject to the Award granted hereunder. Except as otherwise provided in Sections 8(c) or 9 or pursuant to the Plan, the Vesting Schedule requires continued service through each applicable vesting date as a
1
condition to the vesting of the applicable installment and rights and benefits under this Agreement. Partial service, even if substantial, during any vesting period will not entitle the Participant to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment or service as provided in Section 8 below or under the Plan.
5. Dividend and Voting Rights. After the Award Date, the Participant shall be entitled to cash dividends and voting rights with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock subject to the Award even though such shares are not vested, provided that such rights shall terminate immediately as to any shares of Restricted Stock that cease to be eligible for vesting.
6. Restrictions on Transfer. Prior to the time they become vested, neither the shares of Restricted Stock comprising the Award, nor any other rights of the Participant under this Agreement or the Plan may be transferred, except as expressly provided in Sections 1.8 and 4.1 of the Plan. No other exceptions have been authorized by the Committee.
7. Stock Certificates.
(a) Book Entry Form; Information Statement; Power of Attorney. The Corporation shall issue the shares of Restricted Stock subject to the Award in book entry form, registered in the name of the Participant with notations regarding applicable restrictions on transfer. Concurrent with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Corporation shall deliver to the Participant a written information statement with respect to such shares, and, to the extent requested, the Participant shall deliver to the Corporation an executed stock power, in blank, with respect to such shares. The Participant, by receipt of the Award, shall be deemed to appoint the Corporation and each of its authorized representatives as the Participant's attorney(s)-in-fact to effect any transfer of unvested forfeited shares (or shares otherwise reacquired by the Corporation hereunder) to the Corporation as may be required pursuant to the Plan or this Agreement and to execute such documents as the Corporation or such representatives deem necessary or advisable in connection with any such transfer.
(b) Certificates to be Held by Corporation; Legend. Any certificates representing Restricted Stock that the Participant may be entitled to receive from the Corporation prior to vesting shall be redelivered to the Corporation to be held by the Corporation until the restrictions on such shares shall have lapsed and the shares shall thereby have become vested or the shares represented thereby have been forfeited hereunder. Such certificates shall bear the following legend:
"The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the terms and conditions contained in an Agreement entered into between the registered owner, The Macerich Partnership L.P. and The Macerich Company. A copy of such Agreement is on file in the office of the Secretary of The Macerich Company, 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401."
(c) Delivery of Certificates Upon Vesting. Promptly after the lapse or other release of restrictions, a certificate or certificates evidencing the number of shares of Common Stock as to which the restrictions have lapsed or been released or such lesser number as may be permitted pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Plan shall be delivered to the Participant or other person entitled under the Plan to receive the shares. The Participant or such other person shall deliver to the Corporation any representations or other documents or assurances required pursuant to Section 6.4 of the Plan. The shares so delivered shall no longer be restricted shares hereunder. Pursuant to Section 1.7 of the Plan, fractional share interests shall be disregarded, but may be accumulated. The Committee, however, may determine that cash, securities or other property will be paid or transferred in lieu of fractional share interests.
2
8. Effect of Termination of Employment.
(a) Forfeiture after Certain Events. Except as provided in Sections 8(c) and 9 hereof, the Participant's shares of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited to the extent such shares have not become vested upon the date the Participant is no longer employed by the Company for any reason, whether with or without cause, voluntarily or involuntarily. If an entity ceases to be a Subsidiary, such action shall be deemed to be a termination of employment of all employees of that entity, but the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, may make provision in such circumstances for accelerated vesting of some or all of the remaining restricted shares under any Awards held by such employees, effective immediately prior to such event.
(b) Return of Shares. Upon the occurrence of any forfeiture of shares of Restricted Stock hereunder, such unvested, forfeited shares shall, without payment of any consideration by the Corporation for such transfer, be automatically transferred to the Corporation, without any other action by the Participant, or the Participant's Beneficiary or Personal Representative, as the case may be. The Corporation may exercise its powers under Section 7(a) hereof and take any other action necessary or advisable to evidence such transfer. The Participant, or the Participant's Beneficiary or Personal Representative, as the case may be, and the Operating Partnership shall deliver any additional documents of transfer that the Corporation may request to confirm the transfer of such unvested, forfeited shares to the Corporation.
(c) Qualified Termination Upon or Following Change in Control Event. [Subject to Section 18,] if the Participant upon or not later than 12 months following a Change in Control Event has a Qualified Termination (as defined in Section 7.1(gg) of the Plan) or terminates his or her employment for Good Reason, then any portion of the Award that has not previously vested shall thereupon vest, subject to the provisions of Sections 6.2(a), 6.2(e), 6.4 and 6.5 of the Plan and Sections 11 and 12 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the term "Good Reason" means a termination of employment by the Participant for any one or more of the following reasons, to the extent not remedied by the Company within a reasonable period of time after receipt by the Company of written notice from the Participant specifying in reasonable detail such occurrence, without the Participant's written consent thereto: (1) an adverse and significant change in the Participant's position, duties, responsibilities or status with the Company; (2) a change in the Participant's principal office location to a location farther away from the Participant's home which is more than 30 miles from the Participant's principal office; (3) the taking of any action by the Company to eliminate benefit plans without providing substitutes therefor, to materially reduce benefits thereunder or to substantially diminish the aggregate value of the incentive awards or other fringe benefits; provided that if neither a surviving entity nor its parent following a Change in Control Event is a publicly-held company, the failure to provide stock-based benefits shall not be deemed Good Reason if benefits of comparable value using recognized valuation methodology are substituted therefor; and provided further that a reduction or elimination in the aggregate of not more than 10% in aggregate benefits in connection with across the board reductions or modifications affecting persons similarly situated of comparable rank in the Company or a combined organization shall not constitute Good Reason; (4) any reduction in the Participant's Base Salary; or (5) any material breach by the Company of any written employment or management continuity agreement with the Participant. For purposes of the definition of "Good Reason," the term "Base Salary" means the annual base rate of compensation payable as salary to the Participant by the Company as of the Participant's date of termination, before deductions or voluntary deferrals authorized by the Participant or required by law to be withheld from the Participant by the Company, and salary excludes all other extra pay such as overtime, pensions, severance payments, bonuses, stock incentives, living or other allowances, and other benefits and perquisites.
3
9. Effect of Total Disability, Death or Retirement. If the Participant incurs a Total Disability or dies while employed by the Company, then any portion of his or her Award that has not previously vested shall thereupon vest, subject to the provisions of Sections 6.4 and 6.5 of the Plan. If the Participant's employment with the Company terminates as a result of his or her Retirement, the Committee may, on a case-by-case basis and in its sole discretion, provide for partial or complete vesting prior to Retirement of that portion of his or her Award that has not previously vested.
10. Adjustments Upon Specified Events. Upon the occurrence of certain events relating to the Corporation's stock contemplated by Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Committee shall make adjustments as it deems appropriate in the number and kind of securities or other consideration that may become vested under an Award. If any adjustment shall be made under Section 6.2 of the Plan or a Change in Control Event shall occur and the shares of Restricted Stock are not fully vested upon such Event or prior thereto, the restrictions applicable to such shares of Restricted Stock shall continue in effect with respect to any consideration or other securities (the "Restricted Property" and, for the purposes of this Agreement, "Restricted Stock" shall include "Restricted Property," unless the context otherwise requires) received in respect of such Restricted Stock. Such Restricted Property shall vest at such times and in such proportion as the shares of Restricted Stock to which the Restricted Property is attributable vest, or would have vested pursuant to the terms hereof if such shares of Restricted Stock had remained outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Restricted Property includes any cash, the commitment hereunder shall become an unsecured promise to pay an amount equal to such cash (with earnings attributable thereto as if such amount had been invested, pursuant to policies established by the Committee, in interest bearing, FDIC-insured (subject to applicable insurance limits) deposits of a depository institution selected by the Committee) at such times and in such proportions as the Restricted Stock would have vested.
11. Possible Early Termination of Award. As permitted by Section 6.2(b) of the Plan, and without limiting the authority of the Committee under other provisions of Section 6.2 of the Plan or Section 8 of this Agreement, the Committee retains the right to terminate the Award, to the extent it has not vested, upon a dissolution of the Corporation or a reorganization event or transaction in which the Corporation does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its outstanding common stock). This Section 11 is not intended to prevent future vesting of the Award if it (or a substituted award) remains outstanding following a Change in Control Event.
12. Limitations on Acceleration and Reduction in Benefits in Event of Tax Limitations.
(a) Limitation on Acceleration. Notwithstanding anything contained herein [(except as otherwise provided in Section 18 hereof)] or in the Plan or any other agreement to the contrary, in no event shall the vesting of any share of Restricted Stock be accelerated pursuant to Section 6.3 of the Plan or Section 8(c) hereof to the extent that the Company would be denied a federal income tax deduction for such vesting because of Section 280G of the Code and, in such circumstances, the restricted shares not subject to acceleration will continue to vest in accordance with and subject to the other provisions hereof.
(b) Reduction in Benefits. If the Participant would be entitled to benefits, payments or coverage hereunder and under any other plan, program or agreement which would constitute "parachute payments," then notwithstanding any other provision hereof [(except as otherwise provided in Section 18 hereof)] or of any other existing agreement to the contrary, the Participant may by written notice to the Secretary of the Corporation designate the order in which such "parachute payments" shall be reduced or modified so that the Company is not denied federal income tax deductions for any "parachute payments" because of Section 280G of the Code.
(c) Determination of Limitations. The term "parachute payments" shall have the meaning set forth in and be determined in accordance with Section 280G of the Code and regulations issued thereunder. All determinations required by this Section 12, including without limitation the
4
determination of whether any benefit, payment or coverage would constitute a parachute payment, the calculation of the value of any parachute payment and the determination of the extent to which any parachute payment would be nondeductible for federal income tax purposes because of Section 280G of the Code, shall be made by an independent accounting firm (other than the Corporation's outside auditing firm) having nationally recognized expertise in such matters selected by the Committee. Any such determination by such accounting firm shall be binding on the Corporation, its Subsidiaries and the Participant.
13. Tax Withholding. The entity within the Company last employing the Participant shall be entitled to require a cash payment by or on behalf of the Participant and/or to deduct from other compensation payable to the Participant any sums required by federal, state or local tax law to be withheld with respect to the payment of dividends or the vesting of any Restricted Stock, but, in the alternative the Participant or other person in whom the Restricted Stock vests may irrevocably elect, in such manner and at such time or times prior to any applicable tax date as may be permitted or required under Section 6.5 of the Plan and rules established by the Committee, to have the entity last employing the Participant withhold and reacquire shares of Restricted Stock at their Fair Market Value at the time of vesting to satisfy any minimum withholding obligations of the Company with respect to such vesting. Any election to have shares so held back and reacquired shall be subject to such rules and procedures, which may include prior approval of the Committee, as the Committee may impose, and shall not be available if the Participant makes or has made an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to such Award.
14. Notices. Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Corporation at its principal office located at 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary and to the Participant at the address given beneath the Participant's signature hereto, or at such other address as either party may hereafter designate in writing to the other.
15. Plan. The Award and all rights of the Participant with respect thereto are subject to, and the Participant agrees to be bound by, all of the terms and conditions of the provisions of the Plan, incorporated herein by reference, to the extent such provisions are applicable to Awards granted to Eligible Persons. The Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, which is made a part hereof by this reference, and agrees to be bound by the terms thereof. Unless otherwise expressly provided in other Sections of this Agreement, provisions of the Plan that confer discretionary authority on the Committee do not (and shall not be deemed to) create any rights in the Participant unless such rights are expressly set forth herein or are otherwise in the sole discretion of the Committee specifically so conferred by appropriate action of the Committee under the Plan after the date hereof.
16. No Service Commitment by Company. Nothing contained in this Agreement or the Plan constitutes an employment or service commitment by the Company, affects the Participant's status as an employee at will who is subject to termination without cause, confers upon the Participant any right to remain employed by the Company, interferes in any way with the right of the Company at any time to terminate such employment, or affects the right of the Company to increase or decrease the Participant's other compensation or benefits. Nothing in this Section, however, is intended to adversely affect any independent contractual right of the Participant without his or her consent thereto. Employment for any period of time (including a substantial period of time) after the Award Date will not entitle the Participant to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment as provided in Section 3 or 8 above if the express conditions to vesting set forth in such Sections have not been satisfied.
17. Limitation on Participant's Rights. This Award confers no rights or interests other than as herein provided. This Agreement creates only a contractual obligation on the part of the Company as to amounts payable and shall not be construed as creating a trust.
5
[18. Other Agreements. If any provision of this Agreement is inconsistent with any provision of the Management Continuity Agreement dated as of October 26, 2006 between the Corporation and Participant and as it may be amended from time-to-time (the "MCA"), the provisions of the MCA shall control and shall be deemed incorporated herein by reference.]
[This provision and the language in brackets in Sections 8(c), 12(a) and 12(b) are to be included only in agreements with Participants subject to a MCA.]
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. By the Participant's execution of this Agreement, the Participant agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and of the Plan.
THE MACERICH COMPANY (a Maryland corporation) |
||||||||
By: |
||||||||
Richard A. Bayer Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary |
||||||||
THE MACERICH PARTNERSHIP, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) |
||||||||
By: |
The Macerich Company (its general partner) |
|||||||
By: |
||||||||
Richard A. Bayer Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary |
||||||||
PARTICIPANT |
||||||||
(Signature) | ||||||||
«Name» | ||||||||
(Address) | ||||||||
(City, State, Zip Code) |
7
In consideration of the execution of the foregoing Restricted Stock Award Agreement by The Macerich Company and The Macerich Partnership L.P., I, , the spouse of the Participant therein named, do hereby join with my spouse in executing the foregoing Restricted Stock Award Agreement and do hereby agree to be bound by all of the terms and provisions thereof and of the Plan.
Dated: | , | . | ||||
Signature of Spouse |
8
IRREVOCABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY
(Coupled with an interest)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I hereby constitute and appoint Thomas E. O'Hern and Richard A. Bayer and their respective successors in office as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of The Macerich Company (the "Company"), my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any documents and to take any other action to effect the transfer and delivery of up to shares (the "Shares") of Common Stock of the Company issued in my name back to the Company in the event of any occurrence that requires the return to the Company of any or all of the Shares under the terms of the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and the related Restricted Stock Award Agreement to me thereunder dated as of (the "Award"), each as amended from time to time. I further hereby grant unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying, confirming and approving all of the acts which said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or their respective substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
By this document I intend to create a power of attorney coupled with an interest in the Shares to be held by the Company pending satisfaction of conditions to vesting under the terms of the Award and the Plan for an indefinite period of time not less than 10 years. This power of attorney is a durable power of attorney and shall not be affected by my subsequent incapacity or disability or death. I understand that the Award and any continued benefits thereunder is subject to the condition that I grant and the Company or its agents hold an effective power of attorney to the effect set forth herein.
This power of attorney is irrevocable by me at any time prior to the vesting of all of the Shares in accordance with the terms of the Award and the release of all restrictions on the Shares thereunder.
Signature: | ||||
Date | Name: | «Name» | ||
Place |
9
ASSIGNMENT SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE
For Value Received, hereby sells[s], assign[s] and transfer[s] unto The Macerich Company (the "Corporation") Shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation standing in his/her name on the books of the Corporation and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Richard A. Bayer, attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution to transfer said shares on the books of the Corporation.
Dated: , 20
Signature: | ||||
Name: | «Name» |
10
THE MACERICH COMPANY
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
INFORMATION STATEMENT
General Information
This information statement has been provided to «Name» (the "Participant") in connection with a Restricted Stock Award granted to the Participant by The Macerich Company, a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated as of [March] , among the Participant, the Corporation and The Macerich Partnership, L.P. (the "Award Agreement") under the Corporation's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used herein as not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement and the Plan.
Restricted Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to the Award Agreement will be represented in book entry form. This information statement is provided to the Participant pursuant to §2-210 of the Maryland General Corporation Law.
Award Summary
Participant Name: | «Name» | ||
Issuer Name: | The Macerich Company | ||
Class of Security: | Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | ||
Number of Securities: | «Shares» shares |
No Security
THIS STATEMENT IS MERELY A RECORD OF THE RIGHTS OF THE ADDRESSEE AS OF THE TIME OF ITS ISSUANCE. DELIVERY OF THIS STATEMENT, OF ITSELF, DOES NOT CONFER ANY RIGHTS UPON THE RECIPIENT. THE STATEMENT IS NEITHER A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT NOR A SECURITY.
Availability of Further Information Concerning the Capital Stock of the Corporation
The Corporation is authorized to issue three classes of capital stock which are designated as Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Excess Stock. The Corporation will furnish to any stockholder on request and without charge a full statement of the designations and any preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of the stock of each class which the Corporation is authorized to issue, and the differences in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of each series to the extent they have been set, and the authority of the Board of Directors to set the relative rights and preferences of subsequent series. Such request may be made to the Secretary of the Corporation or to its transfer agent.
Restrictions on Transfer
The transferability of Restricted Stock is subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Award Agreement and the Plan. A copy of the Award Agreement is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Corporation.
The securities represented by this certificate are also subject to restrictions on ownership and transfer for the purpose of the Corporation's maintenance of its status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Except as otherwise provided
11
pursuant to the charter of the Corporation, no Person may (1) Beneficially Own shares of Equity Stock in excess of 5.0% (or such greater percentage as may be provided in the charter of the Corporation) of the number or value of the outstanding Equity Stock of the Corporation (unless such Person is an Excluded Participant), or (2) Beneficially Own Equity Stock that would result in the Corporation being "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code (determined without regard to Code Section 856(h)(2) and by deleting the words "the last half of" in the first sentence of Code Section 542(a)(2) in applying Code Section 856(h)), or (3) Beneficially Own Equity Stock that would result in Common Stock and Preferred Stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 Persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution). Any Person who attempts to Beneficially Own shares of Equity Stock in excess of the above limitations must immediately notify the Corporation. All capitalized terms in this paragraph have the meanings defined in the Corporation's charter, as the same may be further amended from time to time, a copy of which, including the restrictions on ownership or transfer, will be sent without charge to each stockholder who so requests. Transfers or other events in violation of the restrictions described above shall be null and void ab initio, and the purported transferee or purported owner shall acquire or retain no rights to, or economic interest in, any Equity Stock held in violation of these restrictions. The Corporation may redeem such shares upon the terms and conditions specified by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion if the Board of Directors determines that a Transfer or other event would violate the restrictions described above. In addition, if the restrictions on ownership or transfer are violated, the shares of Equity Stock represented hereby shall be automatically exchanged for shares of Excess Stock which will be held in trust for the benefit of a Beneficiary. Excess Stock may not be transferred at a profit. The Corporation has an option to acquire Excess Stock under certain circumstances. The foregoing restrictions may also delay, defer or prevent a change of control of the Corporation or other transaction which could be in the best interests of stockholders.
The Corporation will furnish information about all of the restrictions on transferability of these securities to the stockholder, on request and without charge.
12
FORM OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
THE MACERICH COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Optionee: | ||||
Award Date: | ||||
Exercise Price per Share(1): | ||||
Number of Shares(1): | ||||
Expiration Date(2): | ||||
NQSO or ISO(1): | ||||
Vesting Schedule(1)(2): | [100% of the shares on the [third] anniversary of the Award Date] |
THIS AGREEMENT is among THE MACERICH COMPANY, a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), THE MACERICH PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), and is granted pursuant to and subject to The Macerich Company 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned by the Plan.
If the Corporation has designated the Option as an ISO above, the Corporation intends that the Option will be treated as an Incentive Stock Option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code (an "ISO") to the maximum extent permissible under all of the ISO rules and restrictions. Any shares acquired upon exercise of the Option without compliance with all applicable ISO rules will be treated as acquired upon exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option (a "NQSO"). If the Corporation has designated the Option as a NQSO above, the Company intends that the Option will be treated in its entirety as a NQSO and not as an ISO.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Corporation has granted to the Optionee with reference to services rendered and to be rendered to the Company, effective as of the Award Date, an Option upon the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of services rendered and to be rendered prior to exercise by the Optionee and the mutual promises made herein and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as follows:
1. Exercisability of Option. The Option shall vest and become exercisable during its term [in percentage installments of] [for] the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation in accordance with the Vesting Schedule as set forth above and with and subject to the applicable provisions of the Plan and this Agreement. The Option may be exercised only to the extent the Option is exercisable and vested, and, subject to Section 1.8 of the Plan, during the Optionee's lifetime, only by the Optionee. In no event may the Optionee exercise the Option after the Expiration Date as provided above.
(a) Cumulative Exercisability. To the extent the Optionee does not at the time of a particular exercise purchase all the shares that the Optionee may then exercise, the Optionee has the right cumulatively thereafter to purchase any of such shares not so purchased until the Option terminates or expires.
(b) No Fractional Shares; Minimum Exercise. Fractional share interests shall be disregarded, but may be cumulated. No fewer than 100 shares may be purchased at any one time, unless the number purchased is the total number at the time exercisable under the Option.
2. Exercise of Option. To the extent vested and exercisable, the Option may be exercised by the delivery to the Corporation of a written exercise notice stating the number of shares to be purchased pursuant to the Option accompanied by payment of the aggregate Exercise Price of the shares to be purchased and the payment or provision for any applicable employment or other taxes or withholding for taxes thereon. Subject to Section 6.4 of the Plan, the Option shall be deemed to be exercised upon receipt and approval by the Corporation of such written exercise notice accompanied by the aggregate Exercise Price and any other payments so required, as permitted pursuant to Section 3.
3. Method of Payment of Option. Payment of the aggregate Exercise Price shall be by any of the following, or a combination thereof, at the election of the Optionee:
(a) in cash or by electronic funds transfer, or by check payable to the order of the Corporation, in the full amount of the purchase price of the shares and the amount (if any) required to satisfy any applicable withholding taxes; or
(b) by delivering a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the Corporation the amount of sales proceeds necessary to pay the aggregate Exercise Price and, unless otherwise allowed by the Committee, any applicable tax withholding, subject to compliance with applicable law and cashless exercise procedures approved by the Corporation; or
(c) by delivery of shares of Common Stock that have been held by the Optionee for at least six months, in accordance with Section 2.2(b) of the Plan, subject to compliance with applicable law.
Other payment methods may be permitted only if expressly authorized by the Committee with respect to the Option or all options under and consistent with the terms of the Plan.
4. Continuance of Employment Required. Except as otherwise provided in Section 6, the vesting schedule requires continued service through each applicable vesting date as a condition to the vesting of the applicable installment and rights and benefits under this Agreement. Partial service, even if substantial, during any vesting period will not entitle the Optionee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment or service as provided in Section 5 or 8 below or under the Plan.
5. Effect of Termination of Employment on Exercise Period. If the Optionee's employment by either the Corporation or any subsidiary terminates, the Option and all other rights and benefits under this Agreement terminate, except that the Optionee may, at any time within the applicable period below after the Severance Date, exercise the Option to the extent the Option was exercisable on the Severance Date and has not otherwise expired or terminated:
(a) If the Optionee's employment terminates for any reason other than Total Disability or death, Retirement or for Cause, the Optionee shall have three months after the Severance Date to exercise the Option to the extent the Option was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(b) If the Optionee's employment terminates as a result of Total Disability or death, the Optionee (or the Optionee's Personal Representative or Beneficiary, as the case may be) shall
2
have 12 months after the Severance Date to exercise the Option to the extent the Option was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(c) If the Optionee's employment terminates as a result of Retirement, the Optionee (or the Optionee's Personal Representative or Beneficiary, as the case may be) shall have 12 months after the Severance Date to exercise the Option to the extent the Option was exercisable on the Severance Date (provided that, with respect to an ISO, after three months the Option will no longer be exercisable as an ISO) to the extent the Option was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(d) If the Optionee's employment terminates for Cause, the Option shall terminate as of the Severance Date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing exercise periods after the Severance Date, to the extent the Option was otherwise an ISO, the Option will qualify as an ISO only if it is exercised within the applicable exercise periods for ISOs and meets all other requirements of the Code for ISOs; and, in the case of a Total Disability that is not a permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, only if the Option is exercised within three months of the Severance Date. If the Option is not exercised within the applicable exercise periods or does not meet such other requirements, the Option will be rendered a NQSO.
6. Qualified Termination Upon or Following Change in Control Event.
[Subject to Section 20,] If the Optionee upon or not later than 12 months following a Change in Control Event has a Qualified Termination (as defined in Section 7.1(gg) of the Plan) or terminates his or her employment for Good Reason, then any portion of the Option that has not previously vested shall thereupon vest, subject to the provisions of Sections 6.2(a), 6.2(e), 6.4 and 6.5 of the Plan and Sections 7, 8 and 12 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the term "Good Reason" means a termination of employment by the Optionee for any one or more of the following reasons, to the extent not remedied by the Company within a reasonable period of time after receipt by the Company of written notice from the Optionee specifying in reasonable detail such occurrence, without the Optionee's written consent thereto: (1) an adverse and significant change in the Optionee's position, duties, responsibilities or status with the Company; (2) a change in the Optionee's principal office location to a location farther away from the Optionee's home which is more than 30 miles from the Optionee's principal office; (3) the taking of any action by the Company to eliminate benefit plans without providing substitutes therefor, to materially reduce benefits thereunder or to substantially diminish the aggregate value of the incentive awards or other fringe benefits; provided that if neither a surviving entity nor its parent following a Change in Control Event is a publicly-held company, the failure to provide stock-based benefits shall not be deemed Good Reason if benefits of comparable value using recognized valuation methodology are substituted therefor; and provided further that a reduction or elimination in the aggregate of not more than 10% in aggregate benefits in connection with across the board reductions or modifications affecting persons similarly situated of comparable rank in the Company or a combined organization shall not constitute Good Reason; (4) any reduction in the Optionee's Base Salary; or (5) any material breach by the Company of any written employment or management continuity agreement with the Optionee. For purposes of the definition of "Good Reason," the term "Base Salary" means the annual base rate of compensation payable as salary to the Optionee by the Company as of the Optionee's date of termination, before deductions or voluntary deferrals authorized by the Optionee or required by law to be withheld from the Optionee by the Company, and salary excludes all other extra pay such as overtime, pensions, severance payments, bonuses, stock incentives, living or other allowances, and other benefits and perquisites.
7. Adjustments Upon Specified Events. As provided in Section 6.2 of the Plan, upon the occurrence of certain events relating to or affecting the Corporation's stock contemplated by Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Committee shall, in such manner, to such extent (if any) and at such times as it deems appropriate and equitable in the circumstances, make adjustments in the number, amount
3
and type of shares (or other securities or property) subject to the Option, the Exercise Price and the securities deliverable upon exercise of the Option (or any combination thereof) or provide for a cash payment or the assumption, substitution or exchange of the Option or the shares or other securities subject to the Option, based upon the distribution or consideration payable to stockholders generally. All rights of the Optionee hereunder are subject to such adjustments and other provisions of the Plan.
8. Possible Early Termination of Award. As permitted by Section 6.2(b) of the Plan, and without limiting the authority of the Committee under other provisions of Section 6.2 of the Plan or Section 6 of this Agreement, the Committee retains the right to terminate the Option, to the extent it has not vested, upon a dissolution of the Corporation or a reorganization event or transaction in which the Corporation does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its outstanding common stock). This Section 8 is not intended to prevent future vesting (including provision for future vesting) if the Option (or a substituted award) remains outstanding following a Change in Control Event.
9. Change in Subsidiary's Status; Leaves of Absence. If the Optionee is employed only by an entity that ceases to be a subsidiary, this event is deemed for purposes of this Agreement to be a termination of the Optionee's employment by the Company other than a termination for Cause, Total Disability, Retirement or death of the Optionee. Absence from work caused by military service, authorized sick leave or other leave approved in writing by the Company or the Committee shall not be considered a termination of employment by the Company for purposes of Section 5 only if reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is required by contract or law, or such leave is for a period of not more than 90 days.
10. Additional Provisions Applicable to ISOs.
(a) ISO Value Limit. If the aggregate fair market value of the shares with respect to which ISOs (whether granted under the Option or otherwise) first become exercisable by the Participant in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, as measured on the applicable award dates, the limitations of Section 2.3 of the Plan shall apply and to such extent the Option will be rendered a NQSO.
(b) Notice of Sale. The Participant agrees to notify the Corporation of any sale or other disposition of any shares if such sale or disposition of any shares occurs within two years after the Award Date or within one year after the date of exercise of any Option intended as an ISO.
(c) Transferability. In accordance with Section 1.8 of the Plan and the Code, an ISO is not transferable by the Optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and is exercisable during the Optionee's lifetime only by the Optionee.
(d) Tax Withholding. If any portion of the Option is rendered a NQSO in accordance with the terms hereof or applicable law, the Participant shall pay or make provision for the payment of any applicable withholding and employment taxes upon exercise of the Option.
11. Limitation on Exercise of Option. The Optionee will not be entitled to receive Common Stock upon exercise of the Option to the extent that it will cause the Optionee to Beneficially or Constructively Own Equity Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit. If the Optionee exercises any portion of this Option which upon delivery of the Common Stock would cause the Optionee to Beneficially or Constructively Own Equity Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit, the Corporation has the right to deliver to the Optionee, in lieu of Common Stock, a check or cash in the amount equal to the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock otherwise deliverable on the date of exercise (minus any amounts withheld pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Plan).
12. Limitations on Acceleration and Reduction in Benefits in Event of Tax Limitations.
(a) Limitation on Acceleration. Notwithstanding anything contained herein [(except as otherwise provided in Section 20 hereof)] or in the Plan or any other agreement to the contrary, in
4
no event shall the vesting of the Option be accelerated pursuant to Section 6.3 of the Plan or Section 6 hereof to the extent that the Corporation would be denied a federal income tax deduction for such vesting because of Section 280G of the Code and, in such circumstances, the Option will continue to vest in accordance with and subject to the other provisions hereof.
(b) Reduction in Benefits. If the Optionee would be entitled to benefits, payments or coverage hereunder and under any other plan, program or agreement which would constitute "parachute payments," then notwithstanding any other provision hereof [(except as otherwise provided in Section 20 hereof)] or of any other existing agreement to the contrary, the Optionee may by written notice to the Secretary of the Corporation designate the order in which such "parachute payments" shall be reduced or modified so that the Company is not denied federal income tax deductions for any "parachute payments" because of Section 280G of the Code.
(c) Determination of Limitations. The term "parachute payments" shall have the meaning set forth in and be determined in accordance with Section 280G of the Code and regulations issued thereunder. All determinations required by this Section 12, including without limitation the determination of whether any benefit, payment or coverage would constitute a parachute payment, the calculation of the value of any parachute payment and the determination of the extent to which any parachute payment would be nondeductible for federal income tax purposes because of Section 280G of the Code, shall be made by an independent accounting firm (other than the Corporation's outside auditing firm) having nationally recognized expertise in such matters selected by the Committee. Any such determination by such accounting firm shall be binding on the Corporation, its Subsidiaries and the Optionee.
13. Optionee not a Stockholder. Neither the Optionee nor any other person entitled to exercise the Option shall have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Corporation as to any shares of Common Stock until the issuance and delivery to him or her of a certificate evidencing the shares registered in his or her name. No adjustment will be made for dividends or other rights as a stockholder as to which the record date is prior to such date of delivery.
14. No Guarantee of Continued Employment. Nothing contained in this Agreement or the Plan constitutes an employment or service commitment by the Company, affects the Optionee's status as an employee at will who is subject to termination without cause, confers upon the Optionee any right to remain employed by the Company, interferes in any way with the right of the Company at any time to terminate such employment, or affects the right of the Company to increase or decrease the Optionee's other compensation or benefits. Nothing in this Section 14, however, is intended to adversely affect any independent contractual right of the Optionee without his or her consent thereto. Employment for any period of time (including a substantial period of time) after the Award Date will not entitle the Optionee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment if the express conditions to vesting pursuant to Section 1 or 6 have not been satisfied.
15. Non-Transferability of Option. The Option and any other rights of the Optionee under this Agreement or the Plan are nontransferable except as provided in Section 1.8 of the Plan.
16. Notices. Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Corporation at its principal office located at 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary and to the Optionee at the address given beneath the Optionee's signature hereto, or at such other address as either party may hereafter designate in writing to the other.
17. Effect of Award Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor or successors of the Corporation, except to the extent the Committee determines otherwise.
5
18. Entire Agreement; Governing Law. The Plan is incorporated herein by reference. [Subject to Section 20 below,] The Plan and this Agreement constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede in their entirety all prior undertakings and agreements of the Company and the Optionee with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be modified adversely to the Optionee's interest except by means of a writing signed by the Company and the Optionee. The constructive interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement and the Option shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of the State of Maryland.
19. Plan. The Option and all rights of the Optionee with respect thereto are subject to, and the Optionee agrees to be bound by, all of the terms and conditions of the provisions of the Plan, incorporated herein by reference, to the extent such provisions are applicable to Awards granted to Eligible Persons. The Optionee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, which is made a part hereof by this reference, and agrees to be bound by the terms thereof. Unless otherwise expressly provided in other Sections of this Agreement, provisions of the Plan that confer discretionary authority on the Committee do not (and shall not be deemed to) create any rights in the Optionee unless such rights are expressly set forth herein or are otherwise in the sole discretion of the Committee specifically so conferred by appropriate action of the Committee under the Plan after the date hereof.
20. [Other Agreements. If any provision of this Agreement is inconsistent with any provision of the Management Continuity Agreement dated as of [October 26, 2006] between the Corporation and Participant and as it may be amended from time-to-time (the "MCA"), the provisions of the MCA shall control and shall be deemed incorporated herein by reference.] [This provision and the language in brackets in Sections 6, 12(a), 12(b) and 18 are to be included only in agreements with Optionees subject to the MCA. ]
6
THE MACERICH COMPANY, a Maryland corporation |
AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED: | |||
By: |
||||
Its: | (Optionee's Signature) | |||
(City, State, Zip Code) | ||||
(Address) |
CONSENT OF SPOUSE
In consideration of the execution of the foregoing Employee Stock Option Agreement by the Corporation, I, the spouse of the employee named above, join with my spouse in executing this Agreement and agree to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the Plan.
Date: | ||||||||
Signature of Spouse |
7
FORM OF EMPLOYEE STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT AGREEMENT
THE MACERICH COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT AGREEMENT
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Grantee: | |
|||
Award Date: | |
|||
Base Price per Share(1): | |
|||
Number of Shares(1): | |
|||
Expiration Date(2): | |
|||
Vesting Schedule(1),(2): | [100% of the shares on the [third] anniversary of the Award Date] |
THIS AGREEMENT is among THE MACERICH COMPANY, a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), THE MACERICH PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), and is granted pursuant to and subject to The Macerich Company 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned by the Plan.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Corporation has granted to the Grantee with reference to services rendered and to be rendered to the Company, effective as of the Award Date, a Stock Appreciation Right upon the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of services rendered and to be rendered prior to exercise by the Grantee and the mutual promises made herein and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as follows:
1. Exercisability of Stock Appreciation Right. The Stock Appreciation Right shall vest and become exercisable during its term [in percentage installments of] [for] the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation subject to the Stock Appreciation Right in accordance with the Vesting Schedule as set forth above and subject to the applicable provisions of the Plan and this Agreement. The Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised only to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right is exercisable and vested, and, subject to Section 1.8 of the Plan, during the Grantee's lifetime, only by the Grantee. In no event may the Grantee exercise the Stock Appreciation Right after the Expiration Date as provided above.
(a) Cumulative Exercisability. To the extent the Grantee does not at the time of a particular exercise receive all the shares that the Grantee may then receive upon exercise, the Grantee has the right cumulatively thereafter to receive any of such shares not so received until the Stock Appreciation Right terminates or expires.
(b) No Fractional Shares; Minimum Exercise. Fractional share interests shall be disregarded, but may be cumulated. No fewer than 100 shares may be received at any one time, unless the number received is the total number at the time exercisable under the Stock Appreciation Right.
2. Exercise of Stock Appreciation Right. To the extent vested and exercisable, the Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised by the delivery to the Corporation of a written exercise notice
stating the number of shares to be received pursuant to the Stock Appreciation Right accompanied by payment or provision for any applicable employment or other taxes or withholding for taxes thereon. Subject to Section 6.4 of the Plan, the Stock Appreciation Right shall be deemed to be exercised upon receipt and approval by the Corporation of such written exercise notice accompanied by any payments so required.
3. Continuance of Employment Required. Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, the vesting schedule requires continued service through each applicable vesting date as a condition to the vesting of the applicable installment and rights and benefits under this Agreement. Partial service, even if substantial, during any vesting period will not entitle the Grantee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment or service as provided in Section 4 or 7 below or under the Plan.
4. Effect of Termination of Employment on Exercise Period . If the Grantee's employment by either the Corporation or any subsidiary terminates, the Stock Appreciation Right and all other rights and benefits under this Agreement terminate, except that the Grantee may, at any time within the applicable period below after the Severance Date, exercise the Stock Appreciation Right to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right was exercisable on the Severance Date and has not otherwise expired or terminated:
(a) If the Grantee's employment terminates for any reason other than Total Disability or death, Retirement or for Cause, the Grantee shall have three months after the Severance Date to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(b) If the Grantee's employment terminates as a result of Total Disability or death, the Grantee (or the Grantee's Personal Representative or Beneficiary, as the case may be) shall have 12 months after the Severance Date to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(c) If the Grantee's employment terminates as a result of Retirement, the Grantee (or the Grantee's Personal Representative or Beneficiary, as the case may be) shall have 12 months after the Severance Date to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right was exercisable on the Severance Date.
(d) If the Grantee's employment terminates for Cause, the Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate as of the Severance Date.
5. Qualified Termination Upon or Following Change in Control Event.
[Subject to Section 18,] If the Grantee upon or not later than 12 months following a Change in Control Event has a Qualified Termination (as defined in Section 6.2(c) of the Plan) or terminates his or her employment for Good Reason, then any portion of the Stock Appreciation Right that has not previously vested shall thereupon vest, subject to the provisions of Sections 6.2(a), 6.2(e), 6.4 and 6.5 of the Plan and Sections 6, 7 and 9 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the term "Good Reason" means a termination of employment by the Grantee for any one or more of the following reasons, to the extent not remedied by the Company within a reasonable period of time after receipt by the Company of written notice from the Grantee specifying in reasonable detail such occurrence, without the Grantee's written consent thereto: (1) an adverse and significant change in the Grantee's position, duties, responsibilities or status with the Company; (2) a change in the Grantee's principal office location to a location farther away from the Grantee's home which is more than 30 miles from the Grantee's principal office; (3) the taking of any action by the Company to eliminate benefit plans without providing substitutes therefor, to materially reduce benefits thereunder or to substantially diminish the aggregate value of the incentive awards or other fringe benefits; provided that if neither a surviving entity nor its parent following a Change in Control Event is a publicly-held company, the
2
failure to provide stock-based benefits shall not be deemed Good Reason if benefits of comparable value using recognized valuation methodology are substituted therefor; and provided further that a reduction or elimination in the aggregate of not more than 10% in aggregate benefits in connection with across the board reductions or modifications affecting persons similarly situated of comparable rank in the Company or a combined organization shall not constitute Good Reason; (4) any reduction in the Grantee's Base Salary; or (5) any material breach by the Company of any written employment or management continuity agreement with the Grantee. For purposes of the definition of "Good Reason," the term "Base Salary" means the annual base rate of compensation payable as salary to the Grantee by the Company as of the Grantee's date of termination, before deductions or voluntary deferrals authorized by the Grantee or required by law to be withheld from the Grantee by the Company, and salary excludes all other extra pay such as overtime, pensions, severance payments, bonuses, stock incentives, living or other allowances, and other benefits and perquisites.
6. Adjustments Upon Specified Events. As provided in Section 6.2 of the Plan, upon the occurrence of certain events relating to or affecting the Corporation's stock contemplated by Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Committee shall, in such manner, to such extent (if any) and at such times as it deems appropriate and equitable in the circumstances, make adjustments in the number, amount and type of shares (or other securities or property) subject to the Stock Appreciation Right, the Base Price and the securities deliverable upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right (or any combination thereof) or provide for a cash payment or the assumption, substitution or exchange of the Stock Appreciation Right or the shares or other securities subject to the Stock Appreciation Right, based upon the distribution or consideration payable to stockholders generally. All rights of the Grantee hereunder are subject to such adjustments and other provisions of the Plan.
7. Possible Early Termination of Award. As permitted by Section 6.2(b) of the Plan, and without limiting the authority of the Committee under other provisions of Section 6.2 of the Plan or Section 5 of this Agreement, the Committee retains the right to terminate the Stock Appreciation Right, to the extent it has not vested, upon a dissolution of the Corporation or a reorganization event or transaction in which the Corporation does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its outstanding common stock). This Section 7 is not intended to prevent future vesting (including provision for future vesting) if the Stock Appreciation Right (or a substituted award) remains outstanding following a Change in Control Event.
8. Change in Subsidiary's Status; Leaves of Absence. If the Grantee is employed only by an entity that ceases to be a subsidiary, this event is deemed for purposes of this Agreement to be a termination of the Grantee's employment by the Company other than a termination for Cause, Total Disability, Retirement or death of the Grantee. Absence from work caused by military service, authorized sick leave or other leave approved in writing by the Company or the Committee shall not be considered a termination of employment by the Company for purposes of Section 4 only if reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is required by contract or law, or such leave is for a period of not more than 90 days.
9. Limitations on Acceleration and Reduction in Benefits in Event of Tax Limitations.
(a) Limitation on Acceleration. Notwithstanding anything contained herein [(except as otherwise provided in Section 18 hereof)] or in the Plan or any other agreement to the contrary, in no event shall the vesting of the Stock Appreciation Right be accelerated pursuant to Section 6.3 of the Plan or Section 6 hereof to the extent that the Corporation would be denied a federal income tax deduction for such vesting because of Section 280G of the Code and, in such circumstances, the Stock Appreciation Right will continue to vest in accordance with and subject to the other provisions hereof.
(b) Reduction in Benefits. If the Grantee would be entitled to benefits, payments or coverage hereunder and under any other plan, program or agreement which would constitute "parachute
3
payments," then notwithstanding any other provision hereof [(except as otherwise provided in Section 18 hereof)] or of any other existing agreement to the contrary, the Grantee may by written notice to the Secretary of the Corporation designate the order in which such "parachute payments" shall be reduced or modified so that the Company is not denied federal income tax deductions for any "parachute payments" because of Section 280G of the Code.
(c) Determination of Limitations. The term "parachute payments" shall have the meaning set forth in and be determined in accordance with Section 280G of the Code and regulations issued thereunder. All determinations required by this Section 9, including without limitation the determination of whether any benefit, payment or coverage would constitute a parachute payment, the calculation of the value of any parachute payment and the determination of the extent to which any parachute payment would be nondeductible for federal income tax purposes because of Section 280G of the Code, shall be made by an independent accounting firm (other than the Corporation's outside auditing firm) having nationally recognized expertise in such matters selected by the Committee. Any such determination by such accounting firm shall be binding on the Corporation, its Subsidiaries and the Grantee.
10. Limitation on Exercise of Stock Appreciation Right. The Grantee will not be entitled to receive Common Stock upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right to the extent that it will cause the Grantee to Beneficially or Constructively Own Equity Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit. If the Grantee exercises any portion of this Stock Appreciation Right which upon delivery of the Common Stock would cause the Grantee to Beneficially or Constructively Own Equity Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit, the Corporation has the right to deliver to the Grantee, in lieu of Common Stock, a check or cash in the amount equal to the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock otherwise deliverable on the date of exercise (minus any amounts withheld pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Plan).
11. Grantee not a Stockholder. Neither the Grantee nor any other person entitled to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right shall have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Corporation as to any shares of Common Stock until the issuance and delivery to him or her of a certificate evidencing the shares registered in his or her name. No adjustment will be made for dividends or other rights as a stockholder as to which the record date is prior to such date of delivery.
12. No Guarantee of Continued Employment. Nothing contained in this Agreement or the Plan constitutes an employment or service commitment by the Company, affects the Grantee's status as an employee at will who is subject to termination without cause, confers upon the Grantee any right to remain employed by the Company, interferes in any way with the right of the Company at any time to terminate such employment, or affects the right of the Company to increase or decrease the Grantee's other compensation or benefits. Nothing in this Section 12, however, is intended to adversely affect any independent contractual right of the Grantee without his or her consent thereto. Employment for any period of time (including a substantial period of time) after the Award Date will not entitle the Grantee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment if the express conditions to vesting pursuant to Section 1 or 6 have not been satisfied.
13. Non-Transferability of Stock Appreciation Right. The Stock Appreciation Right and any other rights of the Grantee under this Agreement or the Plan are nontransferable except as provided in Section 1.8 of the Plan.
14. Notices. Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Corporation at its principal office located at 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California 90401, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary and to the Grantee at the address given beneath the Grantee's signature hereto, or at such other address as either party may hereafter designate in writing to the other.
4
15. Effect of Award Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor or successors of the Corporation, except to the extent the Committee determines otherwise.
16. Entire Agreement; Governing Law. The Plan is incorporated herein by reference. [Subject to Section 18 below,] The Plan and this Agreement constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede in their entirety all prior undertakings and agreements of the Company and the Grantee with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be modified adversely to the Grantee's interest except by means of a writing signed by the Company and the Grantee. The constructive interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement and the Stock Appreciation Right shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of the State of Maryland.
17. Plan. The Stock Appreciation Right and all rights of the Grantee with respect thereto are subject to, and the Grantee agrees to be bound by, all of the terms and conditions of the provisions of the Plan, incorporated herein by reference, to the extent such provisions are applicable to Awards granted to Eligible Persons. The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, which is made a part hereof by this reference, and agrees to be bound by the terms thereof. Unless otherwise expressly provided in other Sections of this Agreement, provisions of the Plan that confer discretionary authority on the Committee do not (and shall not be deemed to) create any rights in the Grantee unless such rights are expressly set forth herein or are otherwise in the sole discretion of the Committee specifically so conferred by appropriate action of the Committee under the Plan after the date hereof.
18. [Other Agreements. If any provision of this Agreement is inconsistent with any provision of the Management Continuity Agreement dated as of [October 26, 2006] between the Corporation and Participant and as it may be amended from time-to-time (the "MCA"), the provisions of the MCA shall control and shall be deemed incorporated herein by reference. For purposes of the foregoing, the Stock Appreciation Right shall be treated the same as an Option under the MCA.] [This provision and the language in brackets in Sections 5, 9(a), 9(b) and 16 are to be included only in agreements with Grantees subject to the MCA. ]
5
THE MACERICH COMPANY, a Maryland corporation |
AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED: | |||
By: |
(Grantee's Signature) |
|||
Its: | |
(City, State, Zip Code) |
||
(Address) |
In consideration of the execution of the foregoing Employee Stock Appreciation Right Agreement by the Corporation, I, the spouse of the employee named above, join with my spouse in executing this Agreement and agree to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the Plan.
Date: | |
Signature of Spouse |
6
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
3105 WILSHIRE INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
ARROWHEAD FESTIVAL L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
BILTMORE SHOPPING CENTER PARTNERS LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
BROAD RAFAEL ASSOCIATES (LIMITED PARTNERSHIP), a Pennsylvania limited partnership |
BROAD RAFAEL PROPERTIES CORP., a Delaware corporation |
CAMELBACK COLONNADE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
CAMELBACK COLONNADE PARTNERS, an Arizona general partnership |
CAMELBACK COLONNADE SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
CAMELBACK SHOPPING CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
CHANDLER FESTIVAL SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
CHANDLER GATEWAY PARTNERS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
CHANDLER GATEWAY SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
CHANDLER VILLAGE CENTER, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
CHRIS-TOWN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
COOLIDGE HOLDING LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
CORTE MADERA VILLAGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
DANBURY MALL ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Connecticut limited partnership |
DANBURY MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
DANBURY MALL SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
DB HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
DEPTFORD MALL ASSOCIATES L.L.C., a New Jersey limited liability company |
DESERT SKY MALL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
DMA INVESTORS L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
EAST FLAGSTAFF PLAZA ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
EAST MESA LAND, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
EAST MESA MALL, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
FAIR I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FAIR I SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
FAIR II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FAIR II SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
FFC-PANORAMA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FLAGSTAFF MALL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
FLAGSTAFF MALL SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FLATIRON ACQUISITION LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FLATIRON PROPERTY HOLDING, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
FREE RACE MALL REST., L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership |
FREEHOLD I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
147
FREEHOLD I SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
FREEHOLD II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FREEHOLD II SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
FREEMALL ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FREEMALL ASSOCIATES, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership |
FRM ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a New Jersey limited partnership |
FRMR B LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
FRMR, INC., a New Jersey corporation |
GRANITE MALL GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
GREAT NORTHERN HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
GREAT NORTHERN SPE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
HUDSON PROPERTIES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
HUDWIL I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
HUDWIL I SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
HUDWIL IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
HUDWIL IV SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
IMI WALLEYE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
INA AND LA CHOLLA ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
JAREN ASSOCIATES #4, an Arizona general partnership |
KIERLAND COMMONS INVESTMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
KIERLAND GREENWAY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
KIERLAND MAIN STREET, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
KIERLAND RESIDENTIAL/RETAIL I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
KIERLAND TOWER LOFTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
KITSAPARTY, a Washington non-profit corporation |
KTL INVESTMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
LEE WEST, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
LEE WEST II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACDAN CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACDB CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MAC E-COMMERCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH ARROWHEAD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BAYSHORE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BILTMORE CI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BILTMORE MM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BILTMORE OPI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BRICKYARD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH BRISTOL ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
MACERICH BUENAVENTURA GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH BUENAVENTURA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH CARMEL GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
148
MACERICH CARMEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH CENTERPOINT HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CERRITOS ADJACENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CERRITOS HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CERRITOS MALL CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH CERRITOS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CHULA VISTA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CITADEL GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH CITADEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH CM VILLAGE GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH CM VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH COTTONWOOD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CROSSROADS PLAZA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH CROSSROADS SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH DANBURY ADJACENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH DEPTFORD II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH DEPTFORD GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH DEPTFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH DEPTFORD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH DESERT SKY MALL HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH EAST DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH EQ GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH EQ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH FALLBROOK HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH FARGO ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
MACERICH FIESTA MALL ADJACENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH FIESTA MALL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH FM SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH FRESNO GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH FRESNO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH GALLERIA AT SUNSET HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH GOODYEAR CENTERPOINT HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH GREAT FALLS GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH GREELEY ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
MACERICH GREELEY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH GREELEY DEF LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH GREELEY MM CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH HILTON VILLAGE GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH HILTON VILLAGE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH HUNTINGTON OAKS HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
149
MACERICH INLAND LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH JANSS MARKETPLACE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH JESS RANCH HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LA CUMBRE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LA CUMBRE SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LAKEWOOD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LAKEWOOD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LAYTON HILLS HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LUBBOCK GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH LUBBOCK HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH LUBBOCK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH MALL DEL NORTE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California corporation |
MACERICH MANHATTAN GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH MANHATTAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH MARYSVILLE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MERCHANTWIRED, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MESA MALL HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MIDLAND HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MILPITAS HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH MONTEBELLO HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH NEWGATE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH NORTH BRIDGE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH NORTHGATE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH NORTHWESTERN ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
MACERICH NP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH OAKS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH OAKS ADJACENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH OAKS MEZZANINE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH OKLAHOMA GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH OKLAHOMA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH OKLAHOMA WARDS PARCEL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH OXNARD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH PACIFIC VIEW ADJACENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH PANORAMA SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH PLAZA 580 HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH PPR CORP., a Maryland corporation |
MACERICH PROPERTY EQ GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH QUEENS ADJACENT GUARANTOR GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH QUEENS EXPANSION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
150
MACERICH QUEENS GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH QUEENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH QUEENS THEATRE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH RIDGMAR LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH RIMROCK GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH RIMROCK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH SALISBURY B LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SALISBURY GL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SANTA FE PLACE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SANTA MONICA ADJACENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SANTA MONICA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SANTA MONICA PLACE CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH SANTAN PHASE 2 SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SASSAFRAS GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH SASSAFRAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH SCG GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH SCG GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SCG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH SOUTH BAY GALLERIA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SOUTHLAND HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SOUTH TOWNE GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH SOUTH TOWNE HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SOUTH TOWNE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH ST MARKETPLACE GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH ST MARKETPLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH STONEWOOD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH STONEWOOD CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH STONEWOOD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH SUNLAND PARK HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH TRUST LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH TUCSON HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH TWC II CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH TWC II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH TWENTY NINTH STREET LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH TYSONS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH UNIVERSITY MALL HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VALLE VISTA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VALLEY FAIR HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VALLEY RIVER CENTER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VALLEY VIEW ADJACENT GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
151
MACERICH VALLEY VIEW ADJACENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH VALLEY VIEW GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH VALLEY VIEW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH VICTOR VALLEY HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VICTOR VALLEY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VILLAGE SQUARE II HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH VINTAGE FAIRE GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH VINTAGE FAIRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH VV SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WALLEYE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WASHINGTON SQUARE PETALUMA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WESTBAR LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WESTCOR MANAGEMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WESTSIDE ADJACENT GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH WESTSIDE ADJACENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH WESTSIDE GP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH WESTSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership |
MACERICH WHITTWOOD HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WRLP CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH WRLP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH WRLP II CORP., a Delaware corporation |
MACERICH WRLP II L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
MACERICH YUMA HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACERICH ZINFANDEL HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACJ, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACW FREEHOLD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACW MALL MANAGEMENT, INC., a New York corporation |
MACW MIDWEST, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, a New York limited liability company |
MACW TYSONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MACWH, LP, a Delaware limited partnership |
MACWPII LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MAIB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MERCHANTWIRED, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
METROCENTER PERIPHERAL PROPERTY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
METRORISING AMS HOLDING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
METRORISING AMS MEZZ1 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
METRORISING AMS MEZZ2 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
METRORISING AMS OWNER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
152
MIDCOR ASSOCIATES V, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
MONTEBELLO PLAZA ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
MVRC HOLDING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
MW INVESTMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
NEW RIVER ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
NORTH BRIDGE CHICAGO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
NORTHGATE MALL ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
NORTHPARK LAND PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership |
NORTHPARK PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership |
NORTHRIDGE FASHION CENTER LLC, a California limited liability company |
NORTH VALLEY PLAZA ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
PACIFIC PREMIER RETAIL TRUST, a Maryland real estate investment trust |
PANORAMA CITY ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership |
PARADISE WEST #1, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
PARADISE WEST PARCEL 4, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
PHXAZ/KIERLAND COMMONS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR CASCADE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR CREEKSIDE CROSSING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR CROSS COURT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR KITSAP MALL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR KITSAP PLACE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR LAKEWOOD ADJACENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR NORTH POINT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR REDMOND OFFICE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR REDMOND RETAIL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR SQUARE TOO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPRT LAKEWOOD MALL CORP., a Delaware corporation |
PPRT TRUST LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PPR WASHINGTON SQUARE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
PROMENADE ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
PROPCOR ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
PROPCOR II ASSOCIATES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
RACEWAY ONE, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company |
RACEWAY TWO, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company |
RAILHEAD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
RN 116 COMPANY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
RN 120 COMPANY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
RN 124/125 COMPANY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
RN 540 HOTEL COMPANY L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
ROTTERDAM SQUARE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SANTAN FESTIVAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
153
SANTAN VILLAGE PHASE 2 LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
SARWIL ASSOCIATES, L.P., a New York limited partnership |
SARWIL ASSOCIATES II, L.P., a New York limited partnership |
SCOTTSDALE/101 ASSOCIATES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
SCOTTSDALE FASHION SQUARE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SCOTTSDALE FASHION SQUARE PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona general partnership |
SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
SHOPPINGTOWN MALL HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SHOPPINGTOWN MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SHOPPINGTOWN MALL, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
SM EASTLAND MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SM EMPIRE MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SM GRANITE RUN MALL, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
SM MESA MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SM PORTFOLIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership |
SM RUSHMORE MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SM SOUTHERN HILLS MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SM VALLEY MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SOUTHRIDGE ADJACENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
SUPERSTITION SPRINGS HOLDING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
THE MACERICH PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
THE MARKET AT ESTRELLA FALLS LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
THE WESTCOR COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
THE WESTCOR COMPANY II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
TOWNE MALL, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
TOWNE SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
TWC BORGATA CORP., an Arizona corporation |
TWC BORGATA HOLDING, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
TWC CHANDLER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
TWC HILTON VILLAGE, INC., an Arizona corporation |
TWC PROMENADE L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
TWC SCOTTSDALE CORP., an Arizona corporation |
TWC SCOTTSDALE HOLDING, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
TWC SCOTTSDALE MEZZANINE, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
TWC TUCSON, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
TWC II-PRESCOTT MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
TWC II PRESCOTT MALL SPE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
TYSONS CORNER HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
TYSONS CORNER LLC, a Virginia limited liability company |
TYSONS CORNER PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
TYSONS CORNER PROPERTY HOLDINGS II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
154
TYSONS CORNER PROPERTY LLC, a Virginia limited liability company |
TYSONS MALL CERTIFICATES, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company |
WALLEYE RETAIL INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
WALLEYE TRS HOLDCO, INC., a Delaware corporation |
WALTON RIDGMAR, G.P., L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
WEST ACRES DEVELOPMENT, LLP, a North Dakota limited liability partnership |
WESTBAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
WESTCOR 303 CPC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR 303 NSC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR 303 RSC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR 303 WCW LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/303 AUTO PARK LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/303 LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/BLACK CANYON MOTORPLEX LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/BLACK CANYON RETAIL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/CASA GRANDE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/COOLIDGE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/GILBERT, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/GILBERT PHASE 2 LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/GOODYEAR, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR GOODYEAR PC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR GOODYEAR RSC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR LA ENCANTADA, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
WESTCOR MARANA LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR MARANA SALES LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/MERIDIAN LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/MERIDIAN COMMERCIAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/MERIDIAN MEDICAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/MERIDIAN RESIDENTIAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/PARADISE RIDGE, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR PARTNERS OF COLORADO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company |
WESTCOR PARTNERS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/QUEEN CREEK LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/QUEEN CREEK COMMERCIAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/QUEEN CREEK MEDICAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/QUEEN CREEK RESIDENTIAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership |
WESTCOR SANTAN VILLAGE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR SURPRISE CPC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR SURPRISE NSC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR SURPRISE RSC LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
155
WESTCOR SURPRISE WCW LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/SURPRISE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR/SURPRISE AUTO PARK LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
WESTCOR TRS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
WESTDAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership |
WESTLINC ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
WESTPEN ASSOCIATES, an Arizona general partnership |
WILMALL ASSOCIATES, L.P., a New York limited partnership |
WILSAR SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
WILSAR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
WILTON MALL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
WILTON SPC, INC., a Delaware corporation |
WM INLAND ADJACENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
WM INLAND INVESTORS IV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
WM INLAND, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
WM INLAND (MAY) IV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company |
WM RIDGMAR, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
WP CASA GRANDE RETAIL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
156
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Macerich Company
Santa Monica, California
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 File Nos. 333-21157, 333-80129, 333-88718, 333-107063, 333-109733, 333-121630, 333-130993 and Form S-8 File Nos. 33-84038, 33-84040, 333-40667, 333-42309, 333-42303, 333-57898, 333-108193, 333-120585 and 333-00584 of our reports dated February 27, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules of The Macerich Company and of Pacific Premier Retail Trust, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Macerich Company appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2008
157
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Partners
SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.
and The Macerich Company
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-21157), Form S-3 (File No. 333-80129), Form S-3 (File No. 333-88718), Form S-3 (File No. 333-107063), Form S-3 (File No. 333-109733), Form S-3 (File No. 333-121630), Form S-3 (File No. 333-130993) and Form S-8 File Nos. 33-84038, 33-84040, 333-40667, 333-42309, 333-42303, 333-57898, 333-108193, 333-120585 and 333-00584 of The Macerich Company of our report dated February 25, 2008, relating to the balance sheets of SDG Macerich Properties, L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, cash flows, and partners' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Macerich Company.
KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 25, 2008
158
I, Arthur M. Coppola, certify that:
Date: February 27, 2008 |
/s/ ARTHUR M. COPPOLA Arthur M. Coppola President and Chief Executive Officer |
159
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION, Continued:
I, Thomas E. O'Hern, certify that:
February 27, 2008 | /s/ THOMAS E. O'HERN Thomas E. O'Hern Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
160
THE MACERICH COMPANY (The Company)
WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
The undersigned, Arthur M. Coppola and Thomas E. O'Hern, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of The Macerich Company (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
Date: February 27, 2008 | /s/ ARTHUR M. COPPOLA Arthur M. Coppola President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
/s/ THOMAS E. O'HERN Thomas E. O'Hern Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
161